Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kashana Cauley

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2024 May 10.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Procedural close. The venue does not apply anymore (the discussion is moot after mainspacing due to an AfC acceptance). An AfD can be started. WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE arguments expressed in this MfD can be quoted there if needed. (non-admin closure) —Alalch E. 01:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kashana Cauley[edit]

~~I am the article's subject, I regard myself as a non-notable, private person, and request that the article be deleted. Blacksun83 (talk) 18:14, 30 April 2024 (UTC)~~ I am withdrawing this nomination since there's a good chance the article will be deleted in six weeks, which was a rule I didn't know before making the nomination. I don't want to waste anyone's time here, and appreciate all of you for what you do here on wiki.[reply]

Delete - One reviewer in December declined this draft because they said that this draft did not establish biographical notability. This draft would have been deleted in six weeks. See also Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#People_who_are_relatively_unknown. We should extend the same courtesy to the relatively unknown subject of a draft as to the relatively unknown subject of an article. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I don't see any private information in the article. Everything can be verified in the subject's own website and promotional materials and in the references that are already present. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per Robert. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Despite the nomination being struck-through, WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE still applies (given that the only reason for withdrawing was that there's a good chance the article will be deleted under G13). BLP is applicable in all namespaces, so it doesn’t matter for the purposes of BLPREQUESTDELETE that this is a draft rather than an article. Per Robert, the draft would have been deleted in six weeks anyway, and was previously declined for notability. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten_[meow] 07:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Robert McClenon. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 22:47, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Eastmain. Added a few reviews of the book, a television award nomination, and some best of the year lists the novel appeared on, meets WP:BIO. Subject has conducted many publicly available interviews about themself and their work, does not meet WP:LOWPROFILE. Ruth Bader Yinzburg (talk
Delete per Robert and per BLPREQUESTDELETE - Personally I would consider this person to be LOWPROFILE and as such I don't see a problem with this being deleted per the BLP subjects request. –Davey2010^Talk 12:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.