Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 May 18

May 18[edit]

File:The Supremes - Someday We'll Be Together (Italy).png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Textbook WP:NFCC#8 violation. No prejudice to restoration if the article is significantly expanded with sourced critical commentary explicitly discussing this image in-depth -Fastily 09:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The other image File:1969 - Someday We'll Be Together.png was uploaded first and should be used instead for now. Per WP:NFCC#3a, using more than one cover art of same recording discouraged. George Ho (talk) 04:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep: There is no need to delete it. The cover nominated is specific to Italy, which is used exclusively in supported countries => alternative cover. You just only need to change its position in the infobox (this file go to the top, and the Italian version goes down). Alternative or specific covers doesn't mean it is a main cover so it doesn't violate the first of the third criterion.

Kys5g^talk! 09:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kys5g: I'm sorry, but being in the wrong (top) position is not the main reason for deleting this image. (I'll put the other image on top most likely when this image is deleted.) Furthermore, an image being Italian is also not a reason I nominated this image. When I said "uploaded first", I meant that the other image was uploaded much earlier than this one. Also, even swapping images still doesn't prevent this image from failing NFCC.

The image was uploaded because more likely it looks different from the other. However, the info provided by the cover art isn't much (if not at all) different from that of the other cover art. BTW, one admin has been concerned at your talk pageabout the way you've voted. George Ho (talk) 10:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now I don't use these voting icons anymore. Kys5g^talk! 10:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Seal of Unalaska, Alaska.png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is difficult to reach the minimum threshold for copyright protection if it only consists of simple circular geometric shapes and text. The fair use label should be replaced by {{PD-textlogo}}. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 05:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense per nom and undelete larger version. - Eureka Lott 00:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unalaska, Alaska logo.png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Simple text arrangement alone is unlikely to meet the minimum threshold for copyright protection, and the fair use label should be replaced with {{PD-textlogo}}. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 05:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense per nom and undelete larger version. - Eureka Lott 22:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bill Clinton Boulevard2.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I requested its undeletion, since Kosovo now has liberal Freedom of Panorama, thinking that it may show the Bill Clinton statue or one of the buildings along the road. My assumption went wrong (mostly due to deleted files not visible to me as a non-admin). The main object here is a billboard, and Kosovar FoP does not cover works that are typically mean for temporary exhibition, inclusive of most billboards. If the underlying image of Bill Clinton is from a freely-licensed US government source, then it can be kept and transferred to Commons under a suitable PD-USGov tag. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Addition: The image I nominated dates to ca. 2010. A Commons file that incidentally includes the billboard is c:File:American flag on Bill Clinton Boulevard in Prishtinë.jpg (dates to 2018) which shows a very different billboard: a proof that Bill Clinton billboard here is not meant to be permanent. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment is the Kosovo law applied retroactively, or just going forward? -- 65.92.244.237 (talk) 14:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is irrelevant. The image was uploaded in 2010, during the time the Kosovar law was more restrictive, not allowing commercial FoP. The latest reform (which was made last year) does not help as only permanently-placed artistic works (like buildings and sculptures) can be freely used in images. This billboard (not a "mural" as the uploader erroneously called) is not permanent. Serbian copyright law is not applicable as the act of uploading was in 2010, not before 2007. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And finally, even if Serbian FoP is claimed courtesy of date of photography, c:COM:FOP Serbia only covers permanently-placed works. As both the Serbian FoP and the new Kosovar FoP do not cover temporary works, this billboard is almost certainly not covered and this file is "doomed to be nuked." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logan-Cache Airport overview, Oct 2016.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC1, airport still exists. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 11:40, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gift IFSC.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be an artist rendition of the place. Permission needed. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 14:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A Regular Epic Final Battle Part 1.webp[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No need for three non-free images. We should pick at most one to keep, and delete the others. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all: Each image is specific to each correct parts. If one is missing, others can't convey all the plot. Just remove all title cards from the infobox and move all to correct topic in "Plot" section of the article. Kys5g^talk! 10:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all – the title cards add nothing to improve understanding of the whole three-part episode. Sure, the cards help readers identify the parts, but they neither clearly nor contextually signify (what) the episode (is about). George Ho (talk) 10:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all: Fails WP:NFCC#8: simply having three title cards does not provide significant contextual understanding. They are clearly just decorative. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 16:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shin hae chul.jpeg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file Sangjinhwa (talk) 19:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note If the photo is not used, it should be deleted automatically after a few days, so there’s no need to discuss it. Dantus21 (talk) 13:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gaga meat dress.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Press photo. Fails NFCC#2. Josh Milburn (talk) 22:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The size has been reduced and the current photo that is used at Meat dress of Lady Gaga only shows half of the dress. It serves no purpose unless the full dress is shown. Nokia621 (talk) 11:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. The VMA broadcast displayed the full dress, so if it's important that the full dress be shown, a different image from that should be used. hinnk (talk) 07:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.