Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071
KızılBörü1071
- KızılBörü1071 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071/Archive.
A long-term abuse case exists at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/KızılBörü1071.
This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.
A clerk or checkuser recommends that new socks in this case not receive tags per WP:DENY.
This case's socks should have their talk page and email access revoked due to abuse.
06 May 2024[edit]
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets[edit]
- Thegon12345 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools
Serial WP:DUCK (they do nothing else, it seems). E.g. at Siege of Plevna, as discussed before (see archives). tgeorgescu (talk) 11:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users[edit]
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
Confirmed and 
Blocked and tagged along with User:Emrehan1071. I tagged them before seeing the recommendation to not to do, so if someone wants to delete those I have no objection. Aoidh (talk) 14:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)- Closing. (When it's not worth tagging, it's rarely worth un-tagging either, methinks.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
