Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iampharzad
Iampharzad
- Iampharzad (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Populated account categories: suspected
18 April 2024[edit]
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets[edit]
- Bravehm (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
There is reason to believe that Bravehm is a sockpuppet of the blocked Iampharzad (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) and Jadidjw (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). Jadidjw was involved in a war of edits regarding the Mongolian components in articles about the Hazaras: diff. He also deleted sources, claiming they were false: diff. According to Bravehm, correcting the text and returning information about the Mongolian origin is nothing more than made inappropriate changes in the article: diff. Bravehm started editing the page after Jadidjw was blocked. All users have a similar edit history.--KoizumiBS (talk) 23:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
hello users, this Sock user does not belong to me, I only have one account, now I am active with it on Wikipedia.--Bravehm (talk) 11:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't know why HistoryofIran has taken such a strong stance against my edits and considers my user account to be a Sockpuppet, while this is only and only my User account. Those accounts that HistoryofIran refers to are not related to me.--Bravehm (talk) 23:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Bravehm calls KoizumiBS restoration of sourced information about the Mongol aspect of the Hazara (which was removed by Jadidjw) as "removal of sourced content" [1], yet KoizumiBS literally did the opposite of that. Interestingly enough, Jadidjw and Iampharzad (whom I still believe is the same person) both removed sourced information about the Mongol aspect of the Hazara, claiming that they did not remove anything [2] [3]. In other words, all three claim the opposite of what has been done. --HistoryofIran (talk) 23:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Just like the other users in the past SPIs, Bravehm also writes a confusing/broken form of English, and have WP:CIR issues. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Like the other users, Bravehm has also begun removing/altering sourced information about the Mongol aspect of the Hazara [4]. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Bravehm more or less restored the edit of another sock (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HazaraHistorian), both misusing Mousavi [5] [6]. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
This has been up for a month. Can someone please take a look? --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:06, 18 May 2024 (UTC)