Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 8

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< May 7
May 9 >

May 8[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 8, 2024.

Culture Jam (mixtape)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 14:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: "Culture Jam" is mentioned at the target, but it's not clear that it's WP:DUE given that this was a future release teased in 2021, but which does not appear to have been published, and is cited to a press release reprint.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:10, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Wack Attack Barrack[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no mention and also can't really find any credible news source covering it Okmrman (talk) 22:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Unnotable entires should be deleted, not redirected to their parent category (e.g. an unnotable book shouldn't redirect to Book. Air on White (talk) 23:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC) Corrected Air on White (talk) 00:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. I would also note that all of the pages in this batch of redirects to Podcast see fewer than 5 uses a month. A number of them, including this one, see zero. Dan Bloch (talk) 00:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Almost certainly the name of a non-notable podcast trying to fly under AFD's radar. Fieari (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Some random podcast shouldn't be a redirect to the main podcast article. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 05:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lao bai xing[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Baixing. (non-admin closure) Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 22:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFFL jlwoodwa (talk) 21:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Porncast[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no mention Okmrman (talk) 20:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Dan Bloch (talk) 00:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, it's either a neologism/random nonsense someone made up one day, or it's the name of an otherwise non-notable podcast trying to sneak in under AFD's radar. Either way, delete. Fieari (talk) 05:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I'm not seeing any sources that use the term. Appears to be a neologism. TipsyElephant (talk) 19:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Oggcast[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 16#Oggcast

Porncasting[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not mentioned Okmrman (talk) 20:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Dan Bloch (talk) 00:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for the same reason as for the Porncast nomination above. (Bundle these?) Fieari (talk) 05:39, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pod porn[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

have no words other than what? like just why. redirect history is as insignificant as the redirect itself Okmrman (talk) 20:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Also, to be clear, term doesn't appear in target article. Dan Bloch (talk) 00:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for the same reason as for the Porncast nomination above. (Bundle these?) Fieari (talk) 05:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

IPod porn[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

have no words other than what? like just why. redirect history is as insignificant as the redirect itself Okmrman (talk) 20:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Again, doesn't appear in article. Dan Bloch (talk) 00:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for the same reason as for the Porncast nomination above. (Bundle these?) Fieari (talk) 05:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ultraquists[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Okmrman (talk) 21:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Misspelling of "utraquists" Godtres (talk) 20:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Plausible misspelling given the commonness of the prefix "ultra-". Receives multiple pageviews a day. Air on White (talk) 22:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Plausible, in use, thus useful. Keep reason #5. Fieari (talk) 05:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – I made this typo every time I mentioned the subject for four years. Remsense诉 07:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep (from nominator) Thanks @EurekaLott for adding the appropriate tag to the article for a misspelling. This is the right way to proceed, so this nomination can now be closed. Thank you to everyone who helped/commented! I didn't know such a tag existed. Godtres (talk) 18:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of radio broadcasters who also do podcasting[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Says list. No list. It has a page history but the history is clearly not anything to write home about. Okmrman (talk) 20:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Similar to "Auntie Claus (film)"[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete these redirects for a similar reason to "Auntie Claus (film)". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:761F:4600:496B:EF42:29D4:DA9E (talk) 19:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WPSCOUTING[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 23:57, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unneeded redirect. This will only cause confusion. --evrik (talk) 15:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing to whom about what? "WP[THING]" is a really common and helpful redirect for WikiProjects. Keep. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's brand new, and not needed. It's not listed on any of our WP documentation. Unused. Not needed. --evrik (talk) 17:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That in no way answers my question. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and create WP:WPSCOUTING → WP:WikiProject Scouting as well. This is a common convention for redirects to WikiProjects (WP:WPRED/{{WPRED}} come in mind due to the venue we're in), so I don't see how it can be confusing. Nom, can you tell us what it can be confused with? --Nickps (talk) 20:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've worked with this WikiProject for 15 years. We won't use them and we don't need them. This is cruft. --evrik (talk) 20:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Everyone is allowed to edit Wikipedia. Who is helped by deleting this redirect (which I did use prior to it being changed)? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The redirect is completely unused. --evrik (talk) 15:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    A lot of redirects are unused. The point is that you can use them as it's easier and sure enough, that's exactly what I did until someone changed it. I have no clue why you are so insistent on trying to delete a helpful redirect. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's cruft. You created something unused and not needed. It should get deleted. --evrik (talk) 20:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    You are just repeating yourself at this point. Answer me this: what harm would there be were this kept? Who would in any way be worse off? Or, maybe put another way, how is "WPSCOUTING" and different than "{{WPALBUM}}" or "{{WPCALI}}" or any of the dozens of other talk page banner redirects that it uniquely needs to be deleted? Or even "{{WP Scouting}}" which is linked below? How is that not a problem? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Evrik:? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    First, sometimes redirects are WP:COSTLY. Second, it's a duplicate of {{WP Scouting}}. --evrik (talk) 21:09, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Nickps: WP:SCOUTING already exists. Why do we need to duplicate the "WP" in the shortcut? — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 20:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The two WPs mean different things. The second WP in WP:WPSCOUTING stands for WikiProject. As I and User:koavf have said multiple times this is a common pattern for shortcuts to WikiProjects. If you Ctrl+f "WP:WP" in WP:WPR you'll see that for yourself. Nickps (talk) 21:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Most shortcuts to WikiProjects that I have seen and used do not have the second "WP"; in fact, the vast majority of shortcuts at the page you linked do not have the second "WP." This does not seem like a "common pattern" as it occurs 63 times on the page, including multiple entries with multiple uses. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 22:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as an unnecessary duplicate of {{WP Scouting}}. Sometimes redirects are WP:COSTLY. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 20:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, how is this possibly confusing/costly/cruft? WPSCOUTING members are not the only people that would ever need to navigate to the WPSCOUTING template, and it's not obvious to outsiders why this type of redirect wouldn't exist. "WP + Project name" is a very natural & logical search term, possibly even more likely than {{WP Scouting}}, from my experience with WikiProjects (which that redirect was made in 2022 as the second ever redirect to this template, with this being the third, only after Template:ScoutingWikiProject being the first). Utopes (talk / cont) 23:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Unproblematic template shortcut. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 23:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

UA (India)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 15#UA (India)

Earthquake and tsunami, List of earthquakes and tsunamis[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term. ToadetteEdit! 11:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: too many things unlikely and doesn't Skynxnex (talk) 19:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Unlikely search term, few views and no clear target. Air on White (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, as an implausible title. Even if the redirect title was only "Earthquake and tsunami" or "List of earthquakes and tsunamis", it would probably need to be deleted as a XY issue. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 16:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: WP:XY StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 01:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 11:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Milwauke[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Milwaukee. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete spelling to disambig, search results shows products which do not have their own Wikipedia entries. No pages in disambig have the title. ToadetteEdit! 08:04, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hatnote (disambiguation)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 15#Hatnote (disambiguation)

Agamy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft redirect to Wikt:agamy. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 00:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This term has two meanings in English, one being asexual reproduction and the other "Absence or nonrecognition of marriage, or absence of a pair bond", according to wikt:agamy. The current target is because it existed as a duplicate page of Agami, which would be a transliteration/translation, a synonym/alternate term, or a misspelling. I think Wiktionary is the best target. And it should be noted that it would mean agamy [pt; ca; simple] (agamia in Romance langauges), so this could be {{R with possibilities}} (until a better disambiguator exists). --MikutoH talk! 00:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_May_8&oldid=1224105400"