Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 3

May 3[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 3, 2024.

Rigel IV[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:40, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rigel IV → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Rigel (Beta Orionis) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at the target. Using the search function results in hits at Wolf in the Fold, On Venus, Have We Got a Rabbi!, Cap'n Magneto, Lensman series, The Simpsons season 2, and Treehouse of Horror (The Simpsons episode), none of which are obviously the "correct" target. I think the best option here is to let the reader use the search function. TompaDompa (talk) 23:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Name of several unrelated fictional elements, none of which have their own articles. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:51, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are a lot of these redirects. I recommend bundling them together, as I don't see any exceptional cases. These are unlikely as search terms. I don't see these mentioned at the article target either. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:49, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objection to deletion, but it seems disingenuous to use the rationale "not mentioned at the target" after removing the topic from the target. This was the fullest version of the original target Rigel in fiction, which was whittled down by TompaDompa in 2021; I have not traced how much they actually merged to other pages, or whether content was simply deleted from the encyclopedia. – Fayenatic London 16:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know that a full rundown as to why it is not mentioned at the target is needed, but if you want it: Rigel in fiction was cleaned up and then merged to what was then known as Stars and planetary systems in fiction with this edit in 2021. A fair number of edits back and forth later, that page was nominated for deletion (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stars and planetary systems in fiction) a few weeks ago, the outcome of which was that the article was rewritten from scratch, and some additional discussion later it was split into Extrasolar planets in fiction and Stars in fiction. Neither of those two resultant articles cover Rigel IV. TompaDompa (talk) 16:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Eta Ursae Majoris in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eta Ursae Majoris in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Alkaid to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Air on White (talk) 17:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Atlas (star) in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Atlas (star) in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Atlas (27 Tauri) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Atlas (star) to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Epsilon Canis Majoris in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Epsilon Canis Majoris in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Epsilon Canis Majoris (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Epsilon Canis Majoris to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is an "In culture" section, but there is no fictional content. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Delta Eridani in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delta Eridani in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Delta Eridani (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Delta Eridani to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Air on White (talk) 17:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sigma Sculptoris in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sigma Sculptoris in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Sigma Sculptoris (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Sigma Sculptoris to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Iota Persei in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iota Persei in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Iota Persei (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Iota Persei to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gamma Hydrae in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gamma Hydrae in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Gamma Hydrae (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Gamma Hydrae to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Iota Geminorum in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iota Geminorum in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Iota Geminorum (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Iota Geminorum to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Vegan (fiction)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vegan (fiction) → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Vega (Alpha Lyrae) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Vega to retarget to. Seems an implausible search term. Doesn't seem appropriate to retarget to anything related to veganism either. TompaDompa (talk) 23:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Hard to find possible targets in a search, due to conflict with veganism, including fictional vegan characters. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Most of these redirects for planets are too unlikely as search terms. This one is particularly confusing and should be deleted. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:53, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I'm a bit surprised we don't have list articles like List of vegans in fiction or List of fictional vegans. I mean, we have List of vegans, but that's not fiction. Steel1943 (talk) 19:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Zeta Tucanae in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zeta Tucanae in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Zeta Tucanae (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Zeta Tucanae to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Zeta Persei in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zeta Persei in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Zeta Persei (Menkib) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Zeta Persei to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Zeta Ophiuchi in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zeta Ophiuchi in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Zeta Ophiuchi (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Zeta Ophiuchi to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Zeta Draconis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zeta Draconis in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Beta Draconis (Rastaban) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Zeta Draconis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Zeta Aquilae in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zeta Aquilae in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Zeta Aquilae (Okab) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Zeta Aquilae to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:38, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Xi Puppis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Xi Puppis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Xi Puppis (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Xi Puppis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:38, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Theta Hydrae in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Theta Hydrae in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Theta Hydrae (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Theta Hydrae to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Theta Centauri in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Theta Centauri in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Theta Centauri (Menkent) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Theta Centauri to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Theta Capricorni in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Theta Capricorni in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Dorsum (Theta Capricorni) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Theta Capricorni to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tau Coronae Borealis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tau Coronae Borealis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Tau Coronae Borealis (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Tau Coronae Borealis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

T Coronae Borealis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

T Coronae Borealis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#T Coronae Borealis (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at T Coronae Borealis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ross 248 in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ross 248 in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Ross 248 (HH Andromedae) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Ross 248 to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ross 154 in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ross 154 in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Ross 154 (V1216 Sagittarii) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Ross 154 to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ross 128 in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ross 128 in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Ross 128 (FI Virginis) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Ross 128 to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:33, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Also no content at Ross 128 b, its planet. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:47, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Phi Orionis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Phi Orionis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Phi Orionis (φ1 or φ2) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Phi Orionis, Phi1 Orionis, or Phi2 Orionis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:33, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Phi Ophiuchi in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Phi Ophiuchi in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Phi Ophiuchi (8 Ophiuchi) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Phi Ophiuchi to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

P Eridani in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P Eridani in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#p Eridani (Gliese 66) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at p Eridani to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Nu Ophiuchi in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nu Ophiuchi in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Nu Ophiuchi (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Nu Ophiuchi to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mu Herculis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mu Herculis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Mu Herculis (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Mu Herculis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mu Capricorni in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mu Capricorni in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Mu Capricorni (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Mu Capricorni to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mizar and Alcor in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mizar and Alcor in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Mizar (Zeta Ursae Majoris) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Mizar and Alcor to retarget to. There is relevant content at Mizar (where Mizar in fiction redirects), but none at Alcor (star). There are also plausible targets at the disambiguation pages Mizar (disambiguation) (so maybe Mizar in fiction should be retargeted) and Alcor. Methinks it would be best to delete this redirect. TompaDompa (talk) 23:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:XY. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 01:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mintaka in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mintaka in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Mintaka (Delta Orionis) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Mintaka to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Luyten's Star in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Luyten's Star in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Luyten's Star (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Luyten's Star to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The article Luyten b about one of its planets is similarly devoid of fictional content. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Luyten 726-8 in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Luyten 726-8 in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#UV Ceti (Luyten 726–8) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Gliese 65 to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:46, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lambda Serpentis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lambda Serpentis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Lambda Serpentis (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Lambda Serpentis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lambda Scorpii in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lambda Scorpii in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Lambda Scorpii (Shaula) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Lambda Scorpii to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there is an "In culture" section in the star's article, but it contains no fiction-related content. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lalande 46650 in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:26, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lalande 46650 in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Lalande 46650 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Gliese 908 (whereto Lalande 46650 redirects) to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:41, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kruger 60 in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:26, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kruger 60 in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Kruger 60 (DO Cephei) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Kruger 60 to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kappa Velorum in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:26, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kappa Velorum in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Markab / Markeb (Kappa Velorum/Alpha Pegasi) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Kappa Velorum to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kappa Coronae Borealis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:26, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kappa Coronae Borealis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Kappa Coronae Borealis (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Kappa Coronae Borealis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Groombridge 34 in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:26, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Groombridge 34 in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Groombridge 34 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Groombridge 34 to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gliese 876 in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:26, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gliese 876 in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Gliese 876 (Ross 780) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Gliese 876 to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gliese 754 in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:26, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gliese 754 in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Gliese 754 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Gliese 754 to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gliese 687 in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gliese 687 in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Gliese 687 (GJ 687) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Gliese 687 to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gamma Ursae Majoris in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gamma Ursae Majoris in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Phecda (Gamma Ursae Majoris) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Phecda to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gamma Trianguli in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gamma Trianguli in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Gamma Trianguli (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Gamma Trianguli to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gamma Serpentis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gamma Serpentis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Gamma Serpentis (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Gamma Serpentis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gamma Leporis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gamma Leporis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Gamma Leporis (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Gamma Leporis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gamma Andromedae in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gamma Andromedae in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Gamma Andromedae (Almach) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Gamma Andromedae to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Eta Orionis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eta Orionis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Ensis (Eta Orionis) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Eta Orionis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Eta Cassiopeiae in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eta Cassiopeiae in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Eta Cassiopeiae (Achird) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Eta Cassiopeiae to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Eta Boötis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eta Boötis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Eta Boötis (Mufrid) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Eta Boötis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Epsilon Scorpii in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Epsilon Scorpii in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Epsilon Scorpii (Larawag) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Epsilon Scorpii to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Epsilon Indi in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Epsilon Indi in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Epsilon Indi (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Epsilon Indi to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Epsilon Gruis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Epsilon Gruis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Epsilon Gruis (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Epsilon Gruis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Epsilon Boötis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Epsilon Boötis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Izar (Epsilon Boötis) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Epsilon Boötis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Delta Draconis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delta Draconis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Delta Draconis (Altais) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Delta Draconis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Delta Crateris in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delta Crateris in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Delta Crateris (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Delta Crateris to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 23:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Good noms, but they would be more readable if you bunched all those that follow the same reason into one nom. Air on White (talk) 17:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

CY Aquarii in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:29, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CY Aquarii in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#94 Aquarii (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, and CY Aquarii is at time of writing a WP:REDLINK, so that's not a possible retarget. TompaDompa (talk) 22:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This was incorrect to begin with; 94 Aquarii is a distinct object and does not have a variable star designation. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 01:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In fairness, the error seems to have been introduced at a later date by a bot. TompaDompa (talk) 19:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chi Draconis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:29, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chi Draconis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Chi Draconis (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Chi Draconis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Beta Virginis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:29, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Virginis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Beta Virginis (Zavijava) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Beta Virginis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Beta Tauri in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:29, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Tauri in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Beta Tauri (El Nath) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Beta Tauri to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Beta Hydri in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:29, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Hydri in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Beta Hydri (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Beta Hydri to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Beta Eridani in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:29, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Eridani in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Beta Eridani (Cursa) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Beta Eridani to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Beta Corvi in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Corvi in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Beta Corvi (Kraz) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Beta Corvi to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Beta Cassiopeiae in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Cassiopeiae in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Caph (Beta Cassiopeiae) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Beta Cassiopeiae to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Beta Canum Venaticorum in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Canum Venaticorum in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Beta Canum Venaticorum (Chara) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Beta Canum Venaticorum to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Beta Caeli in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Caeli in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Beta Caeli (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Beta Caeli to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Beta Aurigae in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Aurigae in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Beta Aurigae (Menkalinan) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Beta Aurigae to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Beta Aquarii in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Aquarii in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Beta Aquarii (Sadalsuud) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Beta Aquarii to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Beta Andromedae in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Andromedae in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Mirach (Beta Andromedae) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Mirach to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bellatrix in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bellatrix in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Gamma Orionis (Bellatrix) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Bellatrix to retarget to. Bellatrix (disambiguation) mentions a fictional character, Bellatrix Lestrange, but that seems like an unlikely article to be looking for if anybody is searching for "Bellatrix in fiction". TompaDompa (talk) 22:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Characters in Sirius Black's family are mostly named after stars, but are not otherwise associated with those stars. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:41, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Barnard's Star in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barnard's Star in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Barnard's Star (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Barnard's star in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Barnard's Star (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Barnard’s Star in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Barnard's Star (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Barnard's Star to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Category:Fiction set around Barnard's Star exists, though. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 08:05, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Alpha Tucanae in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Tucanae in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Alpha Tucanae (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Alpha Tucanae to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:38, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Alpha Serpentis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Serpentis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Unukalhai (Alpha Serpentis) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Alpha Serpentis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:21, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 08:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Alpha Pavonis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Pavonis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Alpha Pavonis (Peacock) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Alpha Pavonis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 08:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Alpha Hydri in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Hydri in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Alpha Hydri (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Alpha Hydri to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Alpha Draconis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Draconis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Alpha Draconis (Thuban) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Thuban to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Alpha Coronae Borealis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Coronae Borealis in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Alpha Coronae Borealis (Alphecca/Alphekka) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Alpha Coronae Borealis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Alpha Ceti in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Ceti in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Alpha Ceti (Menkar or Menkab) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Alpha Ceti to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Alnitak in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alnitak in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Alnitak (Zeta Orionis) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Alnitak to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Alnilam in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alnilam in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Alnilam (Epsilon Orionis) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Alnilam to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:12, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Alkalurops in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alkalurops in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Alkalurops (Mu Boötis) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Mu Boötis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:12, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Alioth in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alioth in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Alioth (Epsilon Ursae Majoris) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Alioth to retarget to. Per Alioth (disambiguation), there are two fictional entities/characters by this name: Alioth (Marvel Cinematic Universe) and Alioth Epsilon Fenrir (both redirect pages, by the way). TompaDompa (talk) 22:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The first of those is unrelated to the star; not sure about the second. It doesn't matter, though. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Alhena in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alhena in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Alhena (Gamma Geminorum) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Gamma Geminorum to retarget to. No reasonable target at Alhena (disambiguation). TompaDompa (talk) 22:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only contents of the "In culture" section are about ships. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Algenubi in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Algenubi in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Algenubi (Epsilon Leonis) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Epsilon Leonis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:53, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Achernar in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Achernar in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Achernar (Alpha Eridani) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Achernar to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:53, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Acamar in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Acamar in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Acamar (θ Eridani) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Theta Eridani to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 22:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

94 Aquarii in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

94 Aquarii in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#94 Aquarii (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at 94 Aquarii to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 21:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

61 Cygni in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

61 Cygni in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#61 Cygni (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at 61 Cygni to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 21:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:51, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

47 Ursae Majoris in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

47 Ursae Majoris in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#47 Ursae Majoris (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at 47 Ursae Majoris to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 21:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all A long list of similar RfD's; I'd be surprised if there is any reason to retarget any of these based on current content. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 00:59, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Spica in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spica in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Spica (Alpha Virginis) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Spica to retarget to. Spica (disambiguation)#Fictional characters might be a possible target, but I'm more inclined to just delete this redirect. TompaDompa (talk) 21:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fictional characters at the Spica dab page are probably unrelated to Spica the star. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:38, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wolf 359 in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wolf 359 in fiction → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Wolf 359 (CN Leonis) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at the target. Wolf 359 has no content to retarget to, but mentions a fictional Star Trek battle and an episode of The Outer Limits in a hatnote. TompaDompa (talk) 21:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 07:15, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of stars in Star Trek[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of stars in Star Trek → Extrasolar planets in fiction (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at the target. If there is an appropriate place it can be retargeted to, I don't know of it. TompaDompa (talk) 21:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nowhere on this site should we have such a list, and I do not believe we have such a list anywhere on the site. This redirect is useless. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When the redirect was first created, it pointed at a list with several Star Trek stars. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per QuicoleJR. -Elmer Clark (talk) 07:14, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I was originally thinking this redirect could be retargeted to a page titled something like Lists of Star Trek actors, similar to how the article Lists of Star Wars actors exists, but the "Star Trek" article doesn't exist (though there are definitively enough existent to create such a list of lists ... such as List of Star Trek: Voyager cast members and List of Star Trek: The Original Series cast members.) Steel1943 (talk) 15:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per all. Unlikely search term and no real target where it makes sense. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Fictional planetary systems and stars[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional planetary systems and stars → Extrasolar planets in fiction (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

These two topics are now covered at two different articles: Extrasolar planets in fiction and Stars in fiction. Neither of those is the correct target and a disambiguation page seems silly, so I think letting readers rely on the search function is probably the best option here. TompaDompa (talk) 21:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:XY. Also applies below, which is just the reversal of the order and could have just been combined with it. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Implausible / unhelpful search term. -Elmer Clark (talk) 07:13, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all. Search function is better than a redirect here. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I bypassed the double redirect caused when the nominator moved the original target page Stars and planetary systems in fiction 2 days prior to making this nomination (but a bot did not fix the double redirect prior to this nomination initiating); the redirect now targets Extrasolar planets in fiction, which I have updated in the nomination. Steel1943 (talk) 05:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Fictional stars and planetary systems[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional stars and planetary systems → Extrasolar planets in fiction (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

These two topics are now covered at two different articles: Stars in fiction and Extrasolar planets in fiction. Neither of those is the correct target and a disambiguation page seems silly, so I think letting readers rely on the search function is probably the best option here. TompaDompa (talk) 21:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Implausible / unhelpful search term. -Elmer Clark (talk) 07:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ambiguous redirect that is better left to the search engine. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: A disambiguation page has been proposed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 6 § Stars and planetary systems in fiction -- if one is created, this redirect can target that dab page without there being an WP:XY issue. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten_[meow] 20:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) (Thanks to me having an interruption 2 hours ago) Comment: I fixed/updated the redirect's current target. The nominator moved the target of the nominated redirect from Stars and planetary systems in fiction to Extrasolar planets in fiction 2 days before this redirect was nominated, but no bots updated the double redirect ... which I have now done. (I had to look at this nomination a few times since ... if the nominated redirect targeted a page called "Stars and planetary systems in fiction", then WP:XY would not apply. On a related note, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 6#Stars and planetary systems in fiction.) Steel1943 (talk) 22:02, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:XY with the new setup. Steel1943 (talk) 22:02, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rigel 7[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rigel 7 → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Rigel (Beta Orionis) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at the target. Rigel 7 or Rigel VII is apparently the name of the fictional home planet of Kang and Kodos in The Simpsons as well as a planet visited in The Cage (Star Trek: The Original Series). I don't know if either of those possible targets is more appropriate than the other. TompaDompa (talk) 21:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, second choice retarget to Kang and Kodos which at least has a tiny amount of content about the fictional planet (unlike The Cage (Star Trek: The Original Series)). -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rigel VII[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rigel VII → Extrasolar planets in fiction#Rigel (Beta Orionis) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at the target. Rigel 7 or Rigel VII is apparently the name of the fictional home planet of Kang and Kodos in The Simpsons as well as a planet visited in The Cage (Star Trek: The Original Series). I don't know if either of those possible targets is more appropriate than the other. TompaDompa (talk) 21:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, second choice retarget to Kang and Kodos which at least has a tiny amount of content about the fictional planet (unlike The Cage (Star Trek: The Original Series)). -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Poke-navi[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poke-navi → Gameplay of Pokémon#Items (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Poké-navi → Gameplay of Pokémon#Items (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned in target. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete. it's not even called that, it's the "pokénav" cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 23:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not mentioned in target (nor is "pokénav"). -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:41, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Perhaps a poor transliteration of the Japanese and/or Korean (PokéNavi, according to Bulbapedia, without the hyphen) so would appear to be covered by WP:FORRED even if the PokéNav was mentioned in the article. Adam Black ^{talk • contributions} 19:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pokegear[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pokegear → Gameplay of Pokémon#Items (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Pokégear → Gameplay of Pokémon#Items (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned in target. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:33, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete, as it's extremely minor for a mechanic the games want you to think is vital cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 23:21, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not mentioned in target. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nomination, not mentioned and fairly inconsequential. Adam Black ^{talk • contributions} 20:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Added Pokégear, same rationale as original nomination - only difference is Pokégear includes an accent. Adam Black ^{talk • contributions} 20:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pollux in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pollux in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Pollux (Beta Geminorum) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Pollux (star) to retarget to. I don't think any other "Pollux" listed at the disambiguation page Pollux would make for a good target either (nor, for that matter, the disambiguation page itself). TompaDompa (talk) 21:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Regulus in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regulus in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Regulus (Alpha Leonis) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Regulus to retarget to. Regulus (disambiguation)#Fiction is a possible target, though I doubt the entries there are what people searching for "Regulus in fiction" are looking for. TompaDompa (talk) 21:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, with retarget to Regulus (disambiguation)#Fiction as my second choice. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Beta Lyrae in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Lyrae in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Sheliak (Beta Lyrae) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Beta Lyrae to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 21:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:38, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sheliak in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sheliak in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Sheliak (Beta Lyrae) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Beta Lyrae to retarget to. Could perhaps be retargeted to The Ensigns of Command, whereto Sheliak redirects. TompaDompa (talk) 21:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - wouldn't be opposed to the redirect, but seems on the extreme borderline of usefulness. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sigma Draconis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sigma Draconis in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Sigma Draconis (Alsafi) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Sigma Draconis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 21:23, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Zeta Reticuli in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zeta Reticuli in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Zeta Reticuli (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Zeta Reticuli to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 21:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gamma Draconis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gamma Draconis in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Gamma Draconis (Etamin / Eltanin) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Gamma Draconis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 21:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Beta Librae in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Librae in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Beta Librae (Zubeneschamali) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Beta Librae to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 21:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Epsilon Pegasi in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Epsilon Pegasi in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Epsilon Pegasi (Enif) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Epsilon Pegasi to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 21:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:35, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Groombridge 1618 in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Groombridge 1618 in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Groombridge 1618 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Groombridge 1618 to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 21:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:35, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Delta Sagittarii in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delta Sagittarii in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Delta Sagittarii (Kaus Media) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Delta Sagittarii to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 21:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lalande 21185 in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lalande 21185 in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Lalande 21185 (Gliese 411) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Lalande 21185 to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 21:12, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

107 Piscium in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

107 Piscium in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#107 Piscium (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at 107 Piscium to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 21:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

70 Ophiuchi in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

70 Ophiuchi in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#70 Ophiuchi (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at 70 Ophiuchi to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 21:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:31, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Delta Pavonis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delta Pavonis in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Delta Pavonis (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Delta Pavonis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 20:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:31, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Iota Horologii in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iota Horologii in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Iota Horologii (Gliese 108) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Iota Horologii to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 20:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:31, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lacaille 9352 in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lacaille 9352 in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Lacaille 9352 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Lacaille 9352 to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 20:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:31, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mu Cassiopeiae in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mu Cassiopeiae in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Mu Cassiopeiae (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Mu Cassiopeiae to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 20:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tau Cygni in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tau Cygni in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Tau Cygni (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Tau Cygni to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 20:33, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Van Maanen 2 in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Van Maanen 2 in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Van Maanen's Star (Gliese 35) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at van Maanen 2 to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 20:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

82 Eridani in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

82 Eridani in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#82 Eridani (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at 82 G. Eridani to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 20:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:29, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Theta Ursae Majoris in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Theta Ursae Majoris in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Theta Ursae Majoris (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Theta Ursae Majoris to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 20:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:29, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

61 Virginis in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

61 Virginis in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#61 Virginis (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at 61 Virginis to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 19:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gliese 710 in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gliese 710 in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Gliese 710 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Gliese 710 to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 19:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Zeta Piscium in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zeta Piscium in fiction → Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Zeta Piscium (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing at the target on this topic, no content at Zeta Piscium to retarget to. TompaDompa (talk) 19:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:26, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of fictional desert planets[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 19:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of fictional desert planets → List of planets in science fiction#List of planets (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

No such list at the target (or elsewhere, so nowhere to retarget) and not in use. TompaDompa (talk) 19:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. There is relevant content at Desert planet but not a formal list. I don't think retargeting is necessarily helpful, as this redirect is almost completely unused (1 pageview in the last year). - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- There is for the record likewise some relevant content at Extrasolar planets in fiction and Desert planets in science fiction redirects to an anchor there, but no formal list (specifically of desert planets) there either. TompaDompa (talk) 19:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both List of fictional desert planets and Desert planets in science fiction. Both are obsolete redirects to an article subsection that no longer exists. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a topic that isn't covered on Wikipedia. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

That girl is so dangerous[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That girl is so dangerous → Dangerous (Michael Jackson song) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Redirect from an internal song lyric to a song title, which is (a) not even accurate, and (b) ambiguous even if it were. MJ's song features the line ''The girl is so dangerous", but never once says "That girl is so dangerous" according to lyrics databases, while that girl being dangerous is Kardinal Offishall's thing in his otherwise unrelated "Dangerous". Song-lyric to song-title redirects are not generally useful in most instances -- but even when they are warranted, they need to actually be accurate and exclusive to that song, where this is neither of those things. Bearcat (talk) 14:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - besides being inaccurate, song lyrics are also normally copyrighted, which means we should have a very good reason to have them as redirects. This one is not recognizable enough to outweigh the copyright concern and should be deleted. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Neutral: go ahead and delete it if you please. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 16:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Ivanvector's comment. Waylon (was) (here) 16:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not useful. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:22, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not an iconic quote. Air on White (talk) 03:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lady Godiva syndrome[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. It's encouraged to add a mention at target, but I think it's clear that this term makes sense. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Godiva syndrome → Exhibitionism (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Lady Godiva is never mentioned or referred to at the target article. Redirect a hyper-specific reference to an apparent synonym where it never is talked about is not very helpful. People looking for exhibitionism would have gotten to that point through just searching Exhibitionism. The current title might just be more helpful pointed at Lady Godiva, if anything, as the presence of a name within the title makes it seem like the name is the most defining aspect. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The page history just says it's an eponymous synonym for Exhibitionism, which is presumably why it was replaced with a redirect instead. A google search pops up a PubMed article entitled "Lady Godiva syndrome" and while I can't see what the paper says, the "Similar articles" list contains multiple entries all about female exhibitionism, so I find it quite plausible that this synonym is in fact established as a thing in this reliable source. Some non-reliable sources also appear on google stating that it is a synonym, along with "apodysophilia". As an attested synonym, albeit a rare one, I think the redirect is acceptable for wikipedia. The lack of mention at the target shouldn't be a problem, as this is a case of being a direct synonym, and one that is rare enough that it isn't notable. It seems to be reliably sourced, just not interesting enough for article inclusion. Fieari (talk) 06:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or retarget? Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 14:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but add a sentence explaining it. here's a solid ref in German, citing the same Ohio article. or this in English. Unfair to Lady G of course, who was no exhibitionist. Redirecting to her will just confuse readers. Johnbod (talk) 16:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Fieari, and I also agree that it would be worth mentioning in the target article if anyone feels up to adding it. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:21, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Super Saiyan 6[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Super Saiyan 6 → Dragon Ball (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This transformation doesn't even exist. No one is going to use it to find "Dragon Ball". Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 07:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete seems to be different fanon creations unrelated to official materials according to my GSearch. My kid self would enjoy SS6 pictures though. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 13:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SNOW delete This is just fan made nonsense. Waylon (was) (here) 16:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No mention in target article. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Knightfall (comics)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 13#Knightfall (comics)

Rizalito David[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rizalito David → David v. Poe (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Redirect can be expanded into an article, Target page does not have the biography of Rizalito David. Also found that redirect creator is a sockpuppet of user 23prootie.TheNuggeteer (talk) 12:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - at the moment, the information we have on this person is at the current target. If someone wants to write a separate bio the redirect is not stopping them, or they could write it as a draft. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ivanvector. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:17, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hubert’s Lemonade[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:50, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hubert’s Lemonade → The Coca-Cola Company (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Neither "Hubert" nor, surprisingly, "Lemonade" comes up at the target article. Seems to be a brand of lemonade owned by Coca-Cola, but targeting this specific brand to the overarching company is not useful for people looking for Hubert's Lemonade. If people wanted to read about the Coca Cola company instead, they'd just search for the Coca Cola company directly. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to List of Coca-Cola brands#H. I've added an entry with a couple of citations. --BDD (talk) 15:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The title with a curly quote that this has is useless. Feel free to create the correct Hubert's Lemonade. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadette^Edit! 18:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or move without creating additional redirect per PPPery Okmrman (talk) 21:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget per BDD and create the additional redirect. There is nothing "incorrect" about curly quotes. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 21:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Blue Sky Beverage Company. Mentioned there. Steel1943 (talk) 18:11, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Considering I did not read through the other comments before posting my "retarget" comment, I did not notice the odd apostrophe until now. Create Hubert's Lemonade if necessary (but thinking about it, creating it may not be necessary.) Steel1943 (talk) 15:53, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A new target has been proposed. Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk pages.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 12:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to List of Coca-Cola brands#H per BDD's comment. Waylon (was) (here) 16:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and do not retarget per Pppery. I think people may still be missing that this has a special character in it: it's Hubert’s Lemonade and not Hubert's Lemonade. The latter might be worth retargeting, but this version is not. -Elmer Clark (talk) 04:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: If Hubert's Lemonade is created, keep the curly quote version. When typing on an iOS keyboard, it defaults to using curly quotes ’ rather than ' when you mean to type an apostrophe. Fork99 (talk) 04:05, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, do not retarget per Pppery. I've created Hubert's Lemonade targeted to the entry created by BDD; this curlyquote version needs not exist. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 23:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Головна сторінка[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Головна сторінка → Main Page (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 August 6 § Redirects to Main Page – Delete

I originally WP:G4'd this as this has been previously discussed and deleted at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 August 6#Redirects to Main Page, however the creator contested this stating This redirect created for users who trying switch language from Ukrainian to English. Ther always just remove //uk. and input //en. This redirect allow to users going to Main Page dirrectly from Main page of Ukrainian Wiki and We, in the Ukrainian-language Wikipedia, have a similar redirection, and if you erase en and write uk, the user will be redirected to the main page accordingly. Fork99 (talk) 11:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Ukrainian isn't special in this respect. A similar argument could be made for the redirects from other languages which were deleted in the RfD cited above. (The Vietnamese one reappeared recently, and was deleted again and salted.) Even the main page isn't qualitatively special; one could make a similar argument about a hypothetical redirect from Гірнича промисловість Гаяни to Mining in Guyana, though obviously it would affect a much smaller number of readers (probably zero). Certes (talk) 12:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment by nominator: I vaguely remember reading somewhere that what other Wikipedias decide to do has no bearing on what the English Wikipedia does, can anyone confirm this for the second argument made by the creator? If so, I would support a G4 speedy deletion per Certes. Fork99 (talk) 12:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Friends I also want to appeal, apart from all the rules and instructions, to one of the rules of Wikipedia, which is based on the words of the founder.

"If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it."

Currently, the redirect that I created is intended only so that users from Ukraine who enter from the main page and do not go to the link, but change it in the address bar, can conveniently get to the main page of Wikipedia itself, and not to some 404 page. VollyM (talk) 14:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well no, without this redirect you would not end up at a 404 page, you'd end up at a page that looks like this. If you want to go to the Main Page from there, just click on the Wikipedia logo. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good point. To anyone who knows Wikipedia intimately enough to alter its URLs in a productive way, the globe logo is a universal and language-independent symbol for a link to the current wiki's main page. Certes (talk) 17:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I meant this (creating new page is like 404). Also yes, sure, but this is two action. First we have change url, and then click to globe. But all reason why we need this redirect is no additional action needed. We can always going to front-page and then scroll down for change language of front-page but this isn't comfortable. There also is some people who need just change language to going to home page.

We made in Ukrainian version also redirect from [1]https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page?redirect=no to https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%93%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0 and this is comfortable for users. VollyM (talk) 20:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the previous discussion. As I explained above, it is simple to get to the English Wikipedia Main Page from the Ukrainian Wikipedia without this redirect. In fact, this would work from anywhere in the Ukrainian Wikipedia, not just from their Main Page. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per G4. Waylon (was) (here) 16:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete its confusing to have such a redirect on enwiki as it may make people think its ruewiki. Also it can probably be deleted per G4. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How users may think this is ruwiki if these words is Ukrainian? VollyM (talk) 20:23, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
users likely to mistake this for ruewiki and edit in the wrong language, probably cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 23:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's impossible because of Russian and Ukrainian languages is different.

It's like Polish and Czech. Symbols is look like same, but words is different. Or like English and German. VollyM (talk) 13:20, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
by that logic, wouldn't they know that they're not in the right wiki for a головна сторінка?

if wp:rlang was somehow completely wrong about this exact type of situation and those redirects would somehow help people who come here without knowing a word of english, we'd also need a página principal for the folks who make the mistake of bumping into enwiki while brazilian (my condolences to them), or a メインページ for the japanese, and the flood gates would be open to wrong language edits

am i... citing pandora without citing pandora? cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 18:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To be fair, would someone look for United Kingdom in Ukrainian, do it on English WP, and then change the URL to https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom instead of trying to find it in almost 300 languages? Imagine if it leads to a dead end since you don't know what United Kingdom is in Ukrainian? JuniperChill (talk) 18:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's different, because "United Kingdom" is a topic specifically associated with the English language. For similar reasons, English Wikipedia has, and should keep, a redirect Україна → Ukraine. However, we don't have a redirect Франція → France, because that topic isn't associated with Ukrainian. Certes (talk) 19:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Russian is a bit of a red herring. Even a reader who can easily distinguish Ukrainian on sight, and not mistake it for another Cyrillic script such as Russian, might think they are on Ukrainian Wikipedia. Certes (talk) 20:37, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The reasoning from the previous discussion seems sound and consensus on it was clear. No reason to make an exception here. -Elmer Clark (talk) 03:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt as has been done with Hoofdpagina (Dutch) and, as has been noted above, Trang Chính (Vietnamese). It might be worth salting all of the now-deleted redirects listed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 August 6#Redirects to Main Page so that these redirects don't keep getting recreated. Adam Black ^{talk • contributions} 19:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Vietnamese-language redirect precedent. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 21:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. And I was thinking this was a weird case of vandalism. I like Astatine (Talk to me) 15:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: demonstrably useful. Cremastra (talk) 19:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my argument at WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 7#Anasayfa, and salt all entries from the 2015 RfD per Adam Black. Jay 💬 11:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Thonk[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Disambiguate * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thonk → Michael Manring (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Yet another confusing vocabulary word redirect. Apparently "Thonk" was the title of one album this guy made in 1994, but as many of y'all might know, it's also the name of a commonly used emoji (particularly on Discord). I think Thinking, wikt:thonk, or (if mentioned there) List of Generation Z slang would all be better targets than this, but I'm not quite sure - I'd be happy with Michael Manring being mentioned in a hatnote though. Duckmather (talk) 04:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soft redirect to wikit Okmrman (talk) 21:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Several targets were proposed by the nom, and it's not entirely clear which one is best.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soft redirect to wiktionary. mwwv (converse) 11:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate. Between the album (which appears to be titled Thoṅk (with a dotted n)), the We (illbient group) song, and (possibly) Galileo Records, it looks like there's just enough to satisfy WP:DABMENTION. The wiktionary link can also be part of that page. - Eureka Lott 17:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguate per Eureka Lott or Keep current target. The wikt:thonk concept does not need to be mentioned until when/if it gets an article. Suggested alternative redirect targets make no mention of it. -Elmer Clark (talk) 03:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dabify per Eureka. I'm one of several people that would be very WP:SURPRISEDed by the current target. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 23:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Islamist insurgency in Somalia (2007–present)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 22#Islamist insurgency in Somalia (2007–present)

Axis victory in world war ii[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 12:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Axis victory in world war ii → Hypothetical Axis victory in World War II (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Grossly miscapitalized redirects like this one invite visual edits like this one. Due to a longstanding UI misfeature in the visual editor, links to such bad redirects are made every day. They show up in the report of links to miscapitalized redirects, and I fix them. If we would just delete such redirects, including things like united states, there would be a lot fewer errors to fix. Dicklyon (talk) 02:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or perhaps Keep both since you seem to be suggesting the deletion of united states as well. They are valid Template:R from miscapitalizations. Honestly I fail to see the problem to be solved here. The link in the diff was piped so it doesn't show up for readers so use there was not a problem that needed to be fixed. If there is some problem to be fixed that has not been well explained here then it should probably be done through some kind of centralized RFC to delete all Template:R from miscapitalizations rather than nominating one or two arbitrary examples for deletion. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9D60:98F8:7049:A67E (talk) 04:23, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - these aren't errors, they're {{R from lowercase}} redirects and perfectly valid. If the visual editor is causing problems then the solution is to fix the visual editor, not to also break the redirects. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Perfectly valid {{R from miscapitalization}}. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with such grossly miscapitalized redirects is that they don't serve any purpose, since nobody would type that way, and if they did they'd be better served by seeing a redlink. The problem is compounded by the visual editor UI that offers up such links; I agree it would be better to see that fixed, but so far my attempts to get some attention on it have failed. The result of these things is that every day we multiple new entries in the report Wikipedia:Database_reports/Linked_miscapitalizations, and this report will only ever be useful if we can keep up with fixing things on it (at present I can't do the ones with many links, as I don't have JWB access, but I've been keeping up with the ones with fewer than a dozen links, which is a lot of work every day, partly due to the visual editor offering up such grossly miscapitalized redirects all the time). This one, unlike united states seemed to be so clearly useless that I thought I'd try this step as part of the fix for it. Dicklyon (talk) 17:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dicklyon is there a reason why piped links are listed there? Because since they have no effect on the visible output of the page there is no reason they should be. If even excluding those the report is still useless then I think a village pump discussion would be a better way to find a solution, because regardless of outcome, nomination of a handful of arbitrary redirects is not going to resolve the issue. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:32:BC47:A9D:406B (talk) 16:54, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent question. If we could exclude piped links from the report, life would be better all around, and I'd stop working on and being distracted by those. I've forgotten who does that report, but will try to look into it. Dicklyon (talk) 17:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per others: Who is "nobody" you're talking about? AFAIK, people are lazy and don't usually bother with correct capitalisation of search queries on search engines like Google, so it's plausible that readers might do the same on Wikipedia. Fork99 (talk) 23:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep straightforward and valid use of Template:R from miscapitalisation. Nominator may or may not have a valid point about whether we need these in general, but this isn't the right venue to decide that. -Elmer Clark (talk) 03:51, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bonde (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Disambiguate per Joy * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonde (disambiguation) → Bonde (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

I listed this rdr for a G14 because the target, as I stated in my nomination, is now an article with a list of names bearing this title/name. This IPv6 address (2601:5cc:8300:a7f0:9d60:98f8:7049:a67e) reverted my edit as "explicitly" not so, but I want it deleted since it longer serves the purpose for which it was created in the first place. Intrisit (talk) 02:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment that is because WP:G14 does not apply when a page "performs a disambiguation-like function (such as set index articles or lists)". As such, "targeting an article with a list of names bearing this name" is never a reason to tag for G14.

With that explained, it is true WP:INTDABLINK is no longer a concern, and permanent hatnoting for other people with the name could be done through say Bonde (surname), though there is the additional complication of its use as one of the estates of the Swedish Riksdag which may justify maintenance retention. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9D60:98F8:7049:A67E (talk) 04:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Current text of "Bonde" should be moved to House of Bonde or Bonde family or similar, and there should be a separate list as a way to reach Bill Bonde, Alexander Bonde, Arne Bonde, Line Bonde, James Bonde, William Bonde and a number of other people with that surname. (Disambiguate) --Joy (talk) 07:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ - anthroponymy pages disambiguate people with the same name. If someone were to look for the disambiguation page for articles titled "Bonde", the current target is it. If we moved Bonde to a different title with similar content, it would still serve this function and the redirect would still be valid. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I also support Joy's solution for those individuals who are surnamed "Bonde" but aren't members of the noble house. The current list is confusing. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To that end I've created Bonde (surname). Retarget to the newly-created dab page, which links to the House article. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ivanvector it'd be a two-entry disambiguation page, so I'd just squash the surname list into the base title, and keep the link to the medieval nobility on top. We do that elsewhere, and I don't recall seeing anyone having an issue with that. superseded --Joy (talk) 14:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
BTW looking into the history, this actually started off ambiguous twenty years ago, but was reformatted. In the meantime, that other topic mention was deleted five years ago with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Foundation universe planets. --Joy (talk) 14:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like three topics actually since the current page also disambiguates one of the four estates of the Swedish Riksdag, which could still be kept on the same DAB. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:32:BC47:A9D:406B (talk) 17:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The linked article Riksdag of the Estates doesn't actually mention the term as such, only as part of words Bondeståndet and bönder. Are there actual ambiguous references to this term as such, or is it just part of the etymology? --Joy (talk) 18:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The situation is somewhat analogous to say Mississippi River since once context is supplied Bonde may be used to refer to the Bondeståndet in the same way that Mississippi will be used to refer to the river. But you make a point and the standard way to resolve that is to place it within a "see also" section. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:95B3:1631:747A:2941 (talk) 21:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What you describe are actual ambiguous references to this term as such, we just don't have it on record in the linked article. If there's a reasonable chance that an average English reader reads e.g. an article about Swedish parliament history, sees the use of the term "Bonde" there, and looks it up as such, I would put it in the main disambiguation list, not a see also section.

So let's try that then. --Joy (talk) 09:33, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, I'll make a formal recommendation below. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:64D4:1CAD:2D37:C84B (talk) 15:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Make it into a disambiguation. Apart from already discussed items, there is also Bondé, a village in Burkina Faso. Andejons (talk) 12:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per Joy, mostly. Move the "House of Bonde" article to House of Bonde. Move non-family members the list of nameholders from that article to Bonde (surname). Make Bonde a disambiguation page as drafted. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:07, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per Joy see above discussion, and of course the additional page identified by Andejons should also be on the DAB. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:64D4:1CAD:2D37:C84B (talk) 15:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, we added it into the draft already. --Joy (talk) 10:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies, I hadn't checked since last time. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:A165:7AFC:68F9:104D (talk) 16:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).