Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 23

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 23[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 23, 2020.

La Scapigliata[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close (WP:PCLOSE); inappropriate venue. @Aza24: Feel free to take the suggestion made by Sonic678 or use another venue more fitting for the nature of this discussion. (non-admin closure) — Godsy (TALKCONT) 10:15, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This painting is known by many names: Head of a woman, Head of a young girl, Female head, Young Girl's Head etc. But every single source I have found always mentions it as La Scapigliata. (Among one of the other names I listed) I want to move this article's name to La Scapigliata because it is definitely more well known by the name, but since this redirect exists I can not change it. (Note: The French Wikipedia's featured version of the painting goes by La Scapigliata as well) I hope I'm explaining this clearly, but the point I'm making is that I want to rename the main article (Head of a Woman (Leonardo)) as the name this redirect (La Scapigliata) and cannot do so unless this redirect is deleted. Aza24 (talk) 23:35, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

HOG SLAUGHTA BOYZ[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 5#HOG SLAUGHTA BOYZ

Aphelios[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:18, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 18:31, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:VGSCOPE and the rationale at this discussion a few months ago (1st choice). This is apparently a character in the game, but his notability is questionable (sure, he may be popular among players, but probably not enough to warrant his own Wikipedia page). Super weak retarget to Salmo aphelios (2nd choice), a search for the term reveals that it also has a connection with this trout species, but then again I'm not entirely sure it would be a plausible search term for that either, since it's questionable whether people would search organisms with just the species name. Regards, SONIC678 01:56, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose retarget to Salmo aphelios. Compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristis (2nd nomination). If we shouldn't have DAB pages with only specific epithets, we shouldn't have redirects from them either. Narky Blert (talk) 12:54, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ultra Donkey Kong[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:17, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target. Searching online, I found two different explanations on fan wikis: Fandom says that this was the name of a 2007 Wii game (that we don't appear to have an article for), whereas Mariowiki says that this was a working title for a N64/DD64 Donkey Kong game that was never released but was mentioned in a Japanese magazine. Either way, the existing redirect is not particularly helpful. I would suggest deletion unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 18:16, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete the Fandom entry is a complete fake (is it possible to get that deleted) and even if Nintendo Power mentioned a potential game by that name once it seems to trivial to mention.--69.157.254.64 (talk) 02:36, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Yeah, you didn't need to cite the Fandtendo page, it's a joke website (as in the site is completely sarcastic and mostly makes entries on games that don't exist). Not to mention, if the name is mean to combine the N64's code name and Donkey Kong, who would have search for that on Wikipedia? Captain Galaxy (talk) 20:20, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

TOCD[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 5#TOCD

Ultra NES[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:13, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, and an internet search didn't suggest that this is an alternative title for the target. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 18:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete the console was never known as the Ultra NES.--69.157.254.64 (talk) 02:31, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The console has only been know as the Ultra 64 and if it were to have the code name of a previous console, it would have been the SNES. Not to mention, the name 'Ultra NES' is used for an NES emulator. Captain Galaxy (talk) 20:14, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

They're taking the hobbits to isengard[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not helpful for a reader who searches this up. The article tells him exactly nothing about this. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:26, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete As "They're taking the hobbits to ...." or whatever humorous content this has is not at all notable or ....  3125A Talk! Edits!  01:32, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, meme that doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere. Hog Farm (talk) 02:44, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Lord of the Rings film series)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:05, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody will search for it with a ). 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:15, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wicipǣdia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:04, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:15, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 15:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Deinodon cristatus (Marsh)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Aublysodon. --BDD (talk) 14:36, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to refer to Deinodon, recommend retarget to there. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:00, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily. That very article states the material was reassigned to Aublysodon, and that article states they may have belonged to juvenile Tyrannosaurus. FunkMonk (talk) 18:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The holotype of Deinodon is D. horridus. Many other species historically assigned to Deinodon have been re-assigned to other taxa, including this one. I'd probably have this redirect to Aublysodon, or remove the redirect and make it its own page. Dinoguy2 (talk) 19:06, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I'm not an expert at paleontology, but from what I can tell, Deinodon cristatus is an obsolete taxonym for the Tyrannosaurus rex. There have been other Deinodon cristatus, but this does not seem to be ambiguous, because of the (Marsh) qualifier. Marsh was the one who assigned the Deinodon cristatus taxonym, and I can't find evidence of Marsh using this name for another creature. I'm not an expert in paleontology, so there is a decent possibility I missed something somewhere, though. Hog Farm (talk) 02:30, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Deinodon, where it's mentioned. Deinodon is a tyrannosaurid, but a different species to Tyrannosaurus. D. cristatus (Marsh) is a synonym of Aublysodon cristatus. Narky Blert (talk) 13:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Then it should redirect to Aublysodon, not Deinodon. FunkMonk (talk) 21:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Aublysodon or keep at Tyrannosaurus, it is basically considered one of these possibilities, Deinodon was its original, outdated designation. FunkMonk (talk) 09:34, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Aublysodon. Molnar & Carpenter (1989) consider Aublysodon cristatus a junior synonym of Aublysodon mirandus. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 15:52, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 15:39, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Aublysodon following Lythronax above. IJReid {{T - C - D - R}} 19:24, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Aublysodon, according to the article of Deinodon, D. cristatus is a synonym of Aublysodon. JurassicClassic767 (talk) 13:38, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Could anyone neatly incorporate this name at Aublysodon? Its absence would make a retargeting there confusing. --BDD (talk) 21:03, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Under synonyms in infobox. --Bejnar (talk) 02:48, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That works for me. As a potential closer, I saw consensus for a retarget, but an obstacle to that outcome. You've now removed it. Thanks! --BDD (talk) 14:36, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lotr[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget. Some things that have a possibility of confusion still have WP:PRIMARYREDIRECTs. -- JHunterJ (talk) 18:02, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to The Lord of the Rings analogously to LotR. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:51, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You could have just done that, but it's not clear the the dab page isn't a better target. There's a significant chance that someone is referring to one of the other uses. You could look at the stats of the relevant pages. All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 15:05, 23 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Agree that the dab page is best target - offers all the options (LOTR also points to dab page). PamD 15:52, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Compare IoT as a case in point. Narky Blert (talk) 22:09, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget I agree that the dab page is not the best target; Tolkien's "Lord of the Rings" is by far the WP:COMMONNAME for this (I'd rather not have to have to look up pageviews to demonstrate this...) and an editor searching for this (with all of the variant capitalisations) is unlikely to be searching for something else. In that rare case, there is already a hatnote on top... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:00, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget The novel is the primary topic even the dab page is entirely about its adaptations. This probably didn't/shouldn't need discussion. Gotitbro (talk) 01:22, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Simurilian[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 21:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Highly implausible. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:47, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep you can count on the fingers Frodo's hand the number of people who can spell "Silmarillion". All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 15:06, 23 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]
  • Keep. Reasonable attempt at a phonetical pronunciation, Silmarillion is difficult to both spell and pronounce. Hog Farm (talk) 15:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, it helped 17 people in the past year, and for something so cheap, why not. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:22, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: English spelling of the schwa is notoriously inconsistent, and double letters are irregular too. That just leaves the initial L, which is hard to hear and possibly subject to elision in some accents. I consider this combination of mistakes perfectly plausible. --NYKevin 19:27, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gandalv[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 20:58, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Highly implausible. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep, the F and V keys are adjacent to each other on a keyboard, and someone might mistakenly type in "Gandalv" because of their finger slipping off the F key onto the V key. Then again, I'm not sure if this typo's used very often. Regards, SONIC678 14:56, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. The appendices in The Return of the King give the pronunciation of the final "f" as a "v", meaning there are Tolkien purists out there pronouncing it "Gandalv". Will that help people find the correct article? Ehhh, maybe? Woodroar (talk) 15:22, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, it helped 45 people in the past year, and for something so cheap, why not. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:23, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per everyone above. What is to be gained by deleting this redirect? — J947 [cont] 20:27, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Unambiguous and harmless. No gain in deleting, a little bit of benefit in keeping. Hog Farm (talk) 02:45, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. F and V are adjacent to each other on the QWERTY keyboard and Gandalv and Gandalf sound similar. OcelotCreeper (talk) 15:44, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

J.R. R. Tolkien[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 06:41, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible spacing. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:32, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep these are neither new nor harmful. All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 15:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]
  • Keep. Unambiguous and not harmful. Hog Farm (talk) 15:38, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above: this redirect is unambiguous, helpful, and harmless. Ever missed the space bar? Of course you have, plenty of times. — J947 [cont] 20:25, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:MIXEDCAPS[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 3#Wikipedia:MIXEDCAPS

Destruction of isengard[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep after Destruction of Isengard was recreated (non-admin closure) 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:56, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Destruction of Isengard was deleted. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:18, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

'0'[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:54, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the User:Xayahrainie43 has been blocked due to refusal to inability to communicate, and has been globally blocked due to long-term abuse. Also delete the others, such as '2'. User:Dariada1234 (discuss) - Stay home, save life, helps stops COVID-19 09:37, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy per WP:G5. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 10:47, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • But the user was not blocked at the time of creation so G5 does not apply. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:57, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as misleading. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:57, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not sure what they mean, and this isn't a Unicode- or ASCII-like correspondence that I'm aware of, so they're misleading at best. ComplexRational (talk) 15:20, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • This IS unicode/ascii correspondence. 0 = 0X30 = 48, etc. Not sure it's useful: in fact I'm sure it's not. It would be better to Retarget to a suitable page dealing with digits qua digits. Perhaps Digit? All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 15:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]
    Perhaps relating to C (programming language) where single quoted characters take on the meaning of their numeric representation, traditionally ASCII (or EBCDIC). All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 15:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]
    I should have clarified, I am aware of the pattern of 0 = 0x30 = 48, etc., but these redirects don't seem like a logical way of representing them. And as far as programming languages, the char type and similar representations exist in other programming languages such as Java, so I'm not sure about that for a retarget. ComplexRational (talk) 16:15, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh I'm certainly not suggesting redirecting it to C! All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 22:19, 23 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]
  • Delete. Not sure how '0' is supposed to redirect to 2, and all of the rest of that. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 03:06, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget Numerical digit this makes sense as the quotation means a digit qua digit. It doesn't cover the original intent of the redirect, but that can be rectified by expanding the article, and the new target is more general, effectively covering most likely meanings. All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 13:05, 24 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]
  • Retarget to respective pages (0, 2, 3, 9); The hexadecimal meaning is correct but it's extremely unlikely someone looking for '0' is actually looking for 48... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:08, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per RandomCanadian. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 07:39, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:XY. Also quite weird search terms in for both uses. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:37, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

User:GEO IS THE BEST[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. Nominated by a sock-puppet with no other support for deletion. -- Tavix (talk) 14:33, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What the heck it was be that there!?! User:Dariada1234 (discuss) - Stay home, save life, helps stops COVID-19 09:23, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Canis aquaticus[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:39, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Poodles aren't a species. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:42, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, a species of their own. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:42, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:48, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This is not not an obsolete species name, it is listed as a taxonomic synonym for Canis familiaris, as found in the domestic dog article's taxobox. This implies that it could be split out from under C.l. familairis at any time as its own species should evidence indicate that it should not fall under C.l.f., if only we knew what it was. Linnaeus in his Systema Naturae (1758) described it as "pilo crifto longo, inftar ovis" - long feathery hair, like a sheep. That is all we know about it, and to start attributing it to water dogs or poodles based on that evidence is not supported. (Your reference above in not Linnaeus 1758, it is Gmelin 1792 translated from the German into English by Kerr "with additions".) It should simply be deleted; as an article it has only one original mention and can go nowhere. William Harristalk 13:03, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The greek olympics[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Greek Olympics. --BDD (talk) 20:17, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend retarget to Ancient Olympic Games; this redirect was once an article, the former text of which is still on the page. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:28, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:47, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Greek Olympics, now a dab page. All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 15:21, 23 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]
  • Retarget to Greek Olympics. If and when Greek Olympics becomes a redirect, bypass the double redirect as usual. If people want to change Greek Olympics to not be a dab page, they can do that in a separate discussion, since RfD is not the correct forum for doing that. This redirect should follow the outcome of that discussion, whatever it is. --NYKevin 21:04, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Has fun[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 05:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weird phrasing, not likely. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as a fairly common phrase, though less common as a search term. — J947 [cont] 22:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. It's not massively implausible, and it's definitely harmless, but it still seems kind of unlikely and pointless. It's not even getting much use, not even quite managing to average a single view a month. Thegreatluigi (talk) 23:59, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:45, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dawn of civilization[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Human history#Rise of civilization. WP:XY does not apply to the phrase "Dawn of civilization". signed, Rosguill talk 05:47, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A better target is probably Human history#Rise of civilization. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:35, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Modern historian[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 05:04, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe Historian is a better target, or it should just be deleted. The current target makes little sense either way. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:37, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mingrelian Wikipedia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Megrelian Wikipedia. signed, Rosguill talk 05:03, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Megrelian Wikipedia by User:GEO IS THE BEST. User:Dariada1234 (discuss) - Stay home, save life, helps stops COVID-19 06:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gruzija[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Names of Georgia (country). signed, Rosguill talk 05:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What the "Gruzija" country in Croatian, delete per WP:FORRED. User:Dariada1234 (discuss) - Stay home, save life, helps stops COVID-19 06:20, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

გერმანია[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 05:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:FORRED. Georgian language is not a relevant language in Germany. User:Dariada1234 (discuss) - Stay home, save life, helps stops COVID-19 06:16, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Samadashvili, Salome, Malkova, Mia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. Nominated by a sock-puppet with no other support for deletion. -- Tavix (talk) 14:35, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible title styling. User:Dariada1234 (discuss) - Stay home, save life, helps stops COVID-19 05:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: User:ჯეო created these redirects and has not been nominated into RfD yet. User:Dariada1234 (discuss) - Stay home, save life, helps stops COVID-19 05:49, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand what this means. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:02, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Redirects like this are common and not implausible. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:02, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipédia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Wikipedias. signed, Rosguill talk 05:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to List of Wikipedias, since "Wikipédia" could be easily refered to Portuguese Wikipedia, Hungarian Wikipedia, Slovak Wikipedia, etc. rather than French Wikipedia. User:Dariada1234 (discuss) - Stay home, save life, helps stops COVID-19 05:32, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Herero Wikipedia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. Nominated by a sockpuppet with no other support for deletion. -- Tavix (talk) 14:37, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:SNOW. Herero Wikipedia has been closed, emptied and locked per the precedents at meta:Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Herero Wikipedia, but the original user pages still exist. hz.wikipedia.org gives a non-existing "Main Page" as opposed to a browser message that the URL is wrong; and the interlanguage prefix is still operational. User:Dariada1234 (discuss) - Stay home, save life, helps stops COVID-19 05:08, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Water animal[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Aquatic animal. signed, Rosguill talk 05:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose retarget to Aquatic animal, that page has more to do with the redirect. TheAwesomeHwyh 02:51, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget per nom. CMD (talk) 03:29, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Aquatic animal per nom, that'll help readers find out about their intended subject easier, like Land animal redirects to Terrestrial animal. Regards, SONIC678 04:28, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget pn All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 15:28, 23 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]
  • @TheAwesomeHwyh: You know you can boldly retarget redirects yourself, right? You don't need to come to RfD to propose to retarget (unless of course you're unsure or it's controversial, but I didn't see evidence of that here). -- Tavix (talk) 15:32, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Tavix: I know. I had nominated this redirect late at night where I am, so I didn't want to do anything like that in case I was wrong, due to being tired. TheAwesomeHwyh 15:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Perfect eye sight[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Visual acuity#Expression. signed, Rosguill talk 05:00, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose retarget to Visual acuity; this redirect refers to perfect visual acuity. TheAwesomeHwyh 02:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I agree: the redirect should point to visual acuity, rather than visual perception. Possibly it would be more helpful if the redirect would point specifically to Visual_acuity#"Normal"_visual_acuity ParticipantObserver (talk) 14:23, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Maybe but if there were a section "Excellent", should it point there? All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 15:27, 23 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]
  • Retarget to visual acuity#Expression. My first thought was, "this is the same thing as 20/20 vision" - and guess where that redirects. Narky Blert (talk) 21:54, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_May_23&oldid=960897094"