Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Axcient

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Favonian (talk) 07:14, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Axcient[edit]

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTFORPROMOTION, appears to have been written by a WP:UPE, and continues to be unilaterally moved into mainspace despite being AfC rejected. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 19:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The page is promotional and probably not salvageable. Side note: The company itself probably fails Wikipedia's inclusion criteria (WP:CORP). The company should stop wasting time and/or money on trying to get a Wikipedia article written about it; this may be like trying to roll a heavy boulder uphill, forever. There exist cheaper / better means of self-promotion. —Unforgettableid (talk) 08:18, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree with User:Unforgettableid that it is a better expenditure of corporate advertising money to improve a company's own web site, which is under their own control and not subject to neutral point of view. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:50, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete spam. Java Hurricane 04:41, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the topic fails to meet WP:NCORP and infringes on WP:NOTPROMO. If you look into some of the sources used in this draft, you can see most of the coverage is heavily laced with information provided by the company itself (WP:PRIMARY). Forrester.com for example looks to an unassuming editor like a reliable sources but on closer inspection is a pay-for-coverage marketing and consulting company. SamHolt6 (talk) 11:46, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.