Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations/Completed/14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tex → Gooch[edit]

User:Tex would like to take over User:Gooch as a secondary account. I see no harm in this; Gooch is totally unused. I'm placing this notice so there will be a record in the archives. I'll take care of the rename myself after the waiting period. — Dan | talk 01:43, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "Gooch (sort of)" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your vigilance, ClueBot, but all's well here. — Dan | talk 01:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've corrected the title; it seems to me that, if this is to be archived, the header itself should be accurate. You've explained that the request is abnormal in your description, so "(sort of)" isn't really needed. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: In order for me to reformat this request, I need to know what username Tex will be using to change to Gooch. Kingturtle (talk) 11:48, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Kingturtle. Since I would be using this as an alternative account rather than my main account, I don't have an account to change to Gooch. I thought it would be easy enough to change the name of User:Gooch to something else, then I could just create it myself. Would it help if I created an alternative account, like User:Tex (New), and then you could use that account to change to Gooch? Tex (talk) 20:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Yes, please create User:Tex (New). Kingturtle (talk) 02:26, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done! Tex (talk) 13:59, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, Tex. Kingturtle, thanks for the attention, but as I said above, I'll handle this one. cheers — Dan | talk 15:10, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done bibliomaniac15 03:08, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hpfan9374 → Alex Douglas[edit]

I have used my current user name, all through childhood on Wikipedia and other sites, with the "Hp" section of the username referring to Harry Potter. I have since grown up and would like a simple name, that people don't ; my forename and surname.

 Bureaucrat note:The target username has not specified a valid e-mail address. Everything is in order for March 19. Kingturtle (talk) 11:32, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 7835 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:45, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 11:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pallida_Mors_76 → Pallida Mors[edit]

2nd Try, cf. this one, after more time and contributions. Pallida  Mors 21:35, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Considering the original request and notice to the target name took place over a year ago, and the target name has not responded or been used. Kingturtle (talk) 12:49, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fredrik_Wilhelm → Tills[edit]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 16 undeleted edits, 8 deleted edits, and 24 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 09:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Target username's edits were all vandalism (except for one where they removed their own vandalism). En.wiki seems to be the only wiki with this username. Requesting user has made two requests (see immediately below). –xeno (talk) 14:52, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If it's still possible, I would like this username rather than the one below. Fredrik • Wilhelm U|T|C 15:03, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This request appears possible (vandalism is not GFDL-significant) so I marked the one below as not-done. –xeno (talk) 15:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done No need to wait. The target name was vandalism only, and indefinitely blocked. Kingturtle (talk) 13:10, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help. TillsTalk 16:07, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Carolyne@downersmith.fsnet.co.uk → caddy[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 08:53, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Notified. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:00, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for March 23. Kingturtle (talk) 11:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 14:45, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orangoo → Orango[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 06:39, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: The target name has over 1800 edits in ar.wikinews, which is the registered home wiki for the name. The target name was also registered recently in many different projects. Kingturtle (talk) 11:57, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I am Orango in Arabic wikinews, I confirme it now.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.221.27.153 (talk) 17:31, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[1],, Please check my userpage in wikinews now.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.221.27.153 (talk) 17:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for March 24. Kingturtle (talk) 12:20, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 13:18, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
thanks --Orango (talk) 13:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Pontiakas → Atlantas[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 259 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:48, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: user notified. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 19:50, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Pontiakas is my user in English Wikipedia, Atlantas in Lithuanian. I have answered in my local (lt) discussion page, that it is my request.--Pontiakas (talk) 21:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: confirmed, this can be processed on 24 March. RlevseTalk 00:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 13:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RadioFan2 → RadioFan[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 31398 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:16, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for March 27. Kingturtle (talk) 13:48, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done It'll take a long while for your edits to become reattributed under your new name. bibliomaniac15 03:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AlexanderGS → Alexgs[edit]

Hi, I participate mainly in Bulgarian wikipedia. I had an account there since 2007. I think I have created also the same username "Alexgs" at English WP. I tried to retrieve the password, but I am not sure if I have given some old and now non-existing email. I don't receive email from these requests.

Currently I am trying to contribute in the Bulgarian WP, but when I try to go and make small changes ( interwiki links ) in the English pages I have to logout from my bulgarian user and login with my new username "AlexanderGS" into the English WP to do the change and to be able to track the changes.

I have a lot of changes on the Bulgarian WP, and I would like to keep the history. So I didn't find a way to move the "Alexgs" contributions to my new global user "AlexanderGS". That's why I would like if it is possible to take ownership on the English WP usernmae "Alexgs". Then if this happens, I will make my account "Alexgs" global and will work normally without burdens to login/logout for every edit in different WP.

Best regards, Alex

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 5 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 09:50, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If I am understanding this correctly, this is a single user login-related request, and belongs at WP:CHU/SUL. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done bibliomaniac15 00:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Temp21Mar → DMarti[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for March 29. Kingturtle (talk) 13:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done bibliomaniac15 00:14, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anastrophe. → Anastrophe[edit]

part of the reason i'm requesting usurpation is that apparently over the years, various things have been bolloxed up regarding my account and the abandoned Anastrophe account, to wit - when i looked up 'Anastrophe' on special page:users, i see that the Anastrophe account was granted the rollback feature. problem is, if you read section 104 on my talk page, you'll see user yamamoto ichiro informed me that he was granting me rollback, back in february 2008. i always wondered why it never worked - he granted it to the wrong account. further complicating it - there's apparently a redirect in place from User_talk:Anastrophe to my User_talk:Anastrophe. account - which is why i couldn't leave notice on the user's talk page that i wished to usurp the username.Anastrophe (talk) 17:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 8 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 8 total edits. Requesting user has 9289 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 17:42, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For the time being, I have transferred rollback to your account. Xclamation point 12:17, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
thank you. Anastrophe (talk) 16:50, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: notifications presented at target talk page and email. Everything is in order for 2 April. Kingturtle (talk) 14:46, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Moved for organization to reflect the usurpation date. bibliomaniac15 00:15, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done bibliomaniac15 02:52, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Xamkou → Slowpoke[edit]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 230 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:29, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for April 2. Kingturtle (talk) 11:22, 26 March 2009 (UTC) P.S. "Slow Poke" is one of my favorite songs.[reply]
Thanks! And what a strange coincidence! :) Xamkou (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:07, 26 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]
 Done bibliomaniac15 02:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Auzemandius → QuasiAbstract[edit]

~Auzemandius {talk/contrib} 16:49, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 2 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 2 total edits. Requesting user has 3227 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 16:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
QuasiAbstract has just said that they are fine with being usurped. I think this request can go through now, rather than in 7 days. Xclamation point 02:42, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 04:15, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Because you were previously QuasiAbstract, renamed to Auzemandius, and have now changed back, you will need to perform several moves will need to occur manually (which I cannot perform as I'm about to go). Please settle on this name and do not request another rename. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 04:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Matthewedwards 2nd usurp account → ME[edit]

Matthewedwards 2nd usurp account (talk) 05:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is me. Matthewedwards :  Chat  05:14, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 5 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 05:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: I am curious why you're not changing User:Matthewedwards to User:ME. What are your intentions with this second account? Kingturtle (talk) 11:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Because my Matthewedwards account is well established. ME are my initials, and I'd like to use it for edits I don't want to use my main account for, such AWB, and a few other things. Matthewedwards :  Chat  16:10, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
N.B. Request previous declined here, but the rationale for usurpation was different. th.wiki user has not edited since April 5, 2007. –xeno (talk) 16:45, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, you have a good memory; I'd even forgotten about that. Well, whatever; no biggie if it still can't be done. Matthewedwards :  Chat  16:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I would agree with WJB that if it's not going to used, then it shouldn't be usurped, but if you do plan to use it I don't see a problem. No SUL conflict, it's doubtful the th user is returning. –xeno (talk) 17:35, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done This request is different than the previous request. Kingturtle (talk) 12:27, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hold on... why was this done 3 days early? —Anonymous DissidentTalk 12:35, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Forget it; I realised that the user "ME" was in fact alerted to the impending change almost a year ago. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 12:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Senseless → 2[edit]

-Senseless!... says you, says me 05:51, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 7087 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 05:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: - I'm not entirely sure this username is within policy. It might be confusing; give the impression that User:2 is the second registered user or whathaveyou. Usernames consisting solely of numbers are fine, but one number? I'm not sure. Will wait for a second opinion. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't feel its that confusing, something like number 2 or 2nd might give more of a second registered user type of message. Besides there's other contributors with short usernames. What about User:X! -Senseless!... says you, says me 14:02, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And there's also ABCDEFGG!HIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWYZ... X! :  Chat  16:25, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: The target name's home wiki is hu.wiktionary, which has 148 edits. Kingturtle (talk) 11:45, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Bureaucrat note: Mr Senseless, do you own the account "2" on hu.wiktionary? --Dweller (talk) 11:53, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, I don't. -Senseless!... says you, says me 14:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
He hasn't edited there in almost four years it looks like. I know it would cause problems for global account unification because I wouldn't be able to Usurp that paticular instance, but it shouldn't be an issue - I don't speak Hungarian and don't plan to be editing on hu.wiktionary.org anytime soon. -Senseless!... says you, says me 19:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 9 April. Kingturtle (talk) 12:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 00:02, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flamewire2 → Zapple[edit]

Flamewire2 (talk) 23:26, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:27, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have notified the user. Flamewire2 (talk) 02:13, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 9 April. Kingturtle (talk) 11:47, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please email me when the rename is done. Flamewire2 (talk) 01:31, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done and e-mailed. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TrucePointMid → MidPointTruce[edit]

TrucePointMid (talk) 22:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I was the user MidPointTruce but when i went to wikipedia today I noticed i was no longer logged in, and I do not remember my password. I also did not submit an email on the first account, so I would like to usurp it so I can maintain my contribution history.

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • The target username has Wikipedia user logs entries. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • User has 34 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 34 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 22:43, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Checkuser might be able to confirm the identities in this case. MBisanz talk 08:01, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Once we get a CU confirmation on this, the request can be processed immediately. Kingturtle (talk) 12:23, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It does seem likely, based on CheckUser. Dominic·t 05:25, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done with thanks to Dominic. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 05:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HLE123 → HLE[edit]

HLE123 (talk) 19:23, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 7 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:27, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: zhwiki account not likely to be an issue. All clear. MBisanz talk 07:59, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 11 April. Kingturtle (talk) 12:21, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done by Rlevse. bibliomaniac15 00:28, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MinuteElectron → RobertL[edit]

MinuteElectron (talk) 15:02, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 175 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:05, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 13 April. Kingturtle (talk) 12:24, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done as an SUL request. bibliomaniac15 04:25, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Channel R → Yintan[edit]

 Channel R   11:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yintan is an account I made myself, about a year ago. I barely used it and would like to make it my main account now. I could of course just start using it and abandon Channel R, but I'd like Channel R's edits and history attributed to Yintan. Yintan is also my username on other forums and sites on the web. Channel R only exists on WP.  Channel R   11:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 5 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 5 total edits. Requesting user has 8692 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 11:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 11:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, that was fast! Thanks.  Channel R   12:30, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Avruch → Nathan[edit]

Avruch T 20:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Do I need to notify the target account if the target is an indef blocked vandal? Avruch T 20:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • The target username has Wikipedia user logs entries. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 9 undeleted edits, 16 deleted edits, and 25 total edits. Requesting user has 9316 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:33, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Target is indef blocked, edits do not appear GFDL significant. MBisanz talk 01:16, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: I would say that notifying an indef-blocked account is not necessary. They won't be using the username either way. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:19, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Avruch, the target name Nathan is registered in dozens of projects here. Unifying the login is going to be a bear. Are you positive you want this name in spite of that? Kingturtle (talk) 11:29, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, thanks for asking. Avruch T 12:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 11:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oseee → Ose[edit]

Oseee (talk) 12:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ose is my standard identity on various wikis (namely Wikia, where I have some 7000 edits). Having the same identity on Wikipedia would be a benefit, considering how related the projects are. -Oseee (talk) 12:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 12:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Are you the person who registered an enwikinews account in January 2009? MBisanz talk 01:15, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ah yes, I had forgotten about that. Oseee (talk) 06:40, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Err...are you Mosedott? bibliomaniac15 The annual review... 04:03, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uh, yeah, that's an old nick I haven't used anywhere in a long time. Where is it registered? Oseee (talk) 13:45, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So, it seems I had an old account here I had forgotten about. However, Ose is still my preferred nick. Neither this nor the Oseeee account has any significant edits, so I won't really bother if they are just ignored. If I get the Ose nick it is the one I will use. Mosedott (talk) 22:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done All right then, I've renamed Oseeee into Ose. bibliomaniac15 The annual review... 00:55, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate it. Ose (talk) 09:35, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Computerwiz908 → Logan[edit]

Computerwiz908 | Talk 13:55, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Logan is my real name.

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 586 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:57, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note:, target Logan most recently active on dewiki in 2007. I think it is ok to usurp. MBisanz talk 03:22, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Are you sure you want this particular target name? It is registered in over 20 different projects by various users. It would be a major headache for you to try to unify the account. Kingturtle (talk) 12:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
information Note: That's fine with me. Computerwiz908 | Talk 22:56, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 19 April. Kingturtle (talk) 11:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 00:00, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Moho4GFX → Mohannad[edit]

Moho4GFX (talk) 22:02, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mohannad is my real name and I want to use it in every Wikipedia Language I'm in, so if you are able to rename my current account to the requested one then I'll be grateful :).

Mohannad

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 28 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 22:04, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Looks good from here. MBisanz talk 03:08, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 19 April. Kingturtle (talk) 02:21, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 00:01, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

shayan.mashatian → shayanrm[edit]

Shayan.mashatian (talk) 19:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I had already registered a username (shayanrm) and later created another one (shayan.mashatian). My intention was using the new username(shayan.mashatian) but after more investigation on wiki username policy and recommendations, I changed my mind and I'd like to continue with just shayanrm and transfer all the history of shayan.mashatian to shayanrm, and delete shayan.mashatian.

I'd appreciate your help.

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 7 undeleted edits, 15 deleted edits, and 22 total edits. Requesting user has 25 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:45, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: This can be done immediately if you can sign in to shayanrm and confirm here that you own the account. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:19, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 00:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

kevings → kgs499[edit]

Kevings (talk) 18:39, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about re-posting this, but I wanted to add something I wanted to change my user name because I can never remember this one and so I wanted to standardize my user names. I realize this is kind of a non-necessary request but it would be nice if you could change the name, if it is not possible to change my user name right now I also don't have a problem with it. I just wanted to change it so that I wouldn't have to look up my conformation email every time I wished to log in, it kind of negates the purpose of having an account, because often I don't want to look it up.

Thank you very much

- Kevin

 Clerk note: Your account only has a few edits; per the instructions, it is unlikely that a usurpation is possible. –Juliancolton | Talk 18:30, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 2 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 2 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:41, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk note: Target's edits do not appear to be GFDL significant. MBisanz talk 09:24, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 22 April. Kingturtle (talk) 02:20, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 00:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Grandiose2 → Grandiose[edit]

Grandiose2 (talk) 10:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My preferred name, please.--Grandiose2 (talk) 10:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 5 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 10:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 24 April. Kingturtle (talk) 11:30, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 00:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LisaLiel → Lisa[edit]

LisaLiel (talk) 14:12, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to keep using my first name, but I'd rather not use my last name.

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 7 undeleted edits, -7 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1889 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:13, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk note: You understand that it would be rather difficult to unify an SUL given the dozens of other wikis with User:Lisa already registered? MBisanz talk 09:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 01:31, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MathCool10 → MC10[edit]

MC10 | Sign here! 18:27, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:MC10 is already my account. MC10 | Sign here! 18:28, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • User has 11 undeleted edits, 1 deleted edits, and 12 total edits. Requesting user has 5192 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:52, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Since all the edits from MC10 (talk · contribs) are in the userspace, I'd say they're not GFDL-significant. –Juliancolton | Talk 20:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
MC10 is already MathCool10's account so it doesn't matter if the edits are GFDL-significant. GT5162 (我的对话页) 20:53, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
According to this, Dihydrogen Monoxide usurped Giggy on the day that he made the request, so if you ask a bureaucrat, they might be able to do it for you immediately. GT5162 (我的对话页) 21:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I confirm that MC10 is an account of MathCool10. MC10 | Sign here! 21:40, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Looks ok to me. MBisanz talk 01:33, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done can be done early per GT5162. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:39, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seoul Guy → Aar[edit]

 Aaron  ►  17:38, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The request (filed 14 April) was unfulfilled due to concerns regarding a user with the same name having edits in nl. However, as "aar" is a Dutch word (and thus there isn't too much of a reason to assume the accounts belong to the same person), and the sulutil indicates no SUL account exists for that name anyway, I am asking again. Also, my request was never archived, simply removed, which rather confuses me. (Original reason: "Aaron" is my name, and I'm starting to use "Aar" wherever I can now.) Thanks,  Aaron  ►  17:38, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 500 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 17:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done bibliomaniac15 The annual review... 04:51, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Upquark2 → Upquark[edit]

Upquark2 (talk) 17:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've originally created the Upquark account, but have lost access to it. Since then I've been using the then newly created Upquark2 account, but I would like to have it renamed/copied to Upquark. I only just found out the possibility of usurpations.

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 48 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 17:33, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Single edit to talk page does not appear to be GFDL-significant. –xeno talk 22:43, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 11:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DoomedSoldiers → Robert Warren[edit]

Doomed Soldiers (talk) 19:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 44 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Notified. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 21:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment to DoomedSoldiers: if this is your realname, have you considered the cautions at WP:REALNAME ? –xeno talk 22:43, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: The target name has an email address. Has the target name been emailed? Kingturtle (talk) 11:42, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AD did it, if I'm not mistaken. bibliomaniac15 The annual review... 20:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done bibliomaniac15 The annual review... 04:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


offthewall234 → Akkeresu[edit]

~Ark =^-^= (talk) 14:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to move offthewall234's contributions into Akkeresu. I own both accounts, but I would like to use Akkeresu, and keepp my contribs. ~Ark =^-^= (talk) 14:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is Akkeresu, signifying the above statement as correct, and wanting to bring offthewall234's contribs into Akkeresu, as I am the user for both accounts. Akkeresu (talk) 14:57, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • User has 5 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 5 total edits. Requesting user has 28 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, if that is an issue, then feel free to deny this and archive it, I'll simply start over and use Akkeresu. Thanks for the help! Akkeresu (talk) 15:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Since you own both account this can be speedily done. bibliomaniac15 The annual review... 04:05, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Divya da animal lvr → DMP47[edit]

Divya da animal lvr (talk) 20:59, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "DMP47" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done The user "Divya da animal lvr" has been renamed to "DMP47". This was a CHU. Kingturtle (talk) 13:24, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HBR2 → HBR[edit]

HBR2 (talk) 18:15, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I use the Wikipedia name HBR since 2005. (Without en, becouse it was still used.) I have HBR in most projects. I am trusted and rollback-user, with over 1000 edits in wikipedia.de, over 600 in commons, and over 2000 together.

I ask the user HBR (User_talk:HBR) in 2008 for a chance, but didn't get a response. User User:HBR have only 17 edits between 2005 and 2006. No edits in the last 3 years. Please change my User-Name from HBR2 to HBR. Best Regards HBR2 (talk) 18:15, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 17 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 17 total edits. Requesting user has 53 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:52, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 4 May. Kingturtle (talk) 13:19, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Speedily because it was in relation to SUL. bibliomaniac15 The annual review... 04:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Theta → Theta682[edit]

\Theta (talk) 14:54, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My first account was Theta on Russian wikipedia. Later I created Theta682 account on wiktionary. I would like to have SUL account Theta682.

Note:
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 16 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done User owns both accounts. bibliomaniac15 The annual review... 04:27, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lucasbfr → Luk[edit]

-- lucasbfr talk 13:03, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Luk being a 3 letters username, it obviously exists on many projects. There is no SUL account under 'Luk', but I have contacted the main user, fr:User:Luk on fr.wp (and probably commons and meta), by email and he condones me using Luk on en.wp (he is no longer very active). I will keep Lucasbfr on all the other WMF projects. -- lucasbfr talk 13:03, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 37311 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:52, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Took me about 5 tries to do it, but I finally managed to get you to rename. It will take a long while for your edits to become reattributed to your new name because of the sheer amount of edits you've made. bibliomaniac15 The annual review... 04:04, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Slide Usurp → Slide[edit]

Slide Usurp (talk) 21:57, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Looks ok, may have trouble unifying at itwiki and enwikibooks. MBisanz talk 01:35, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've been told by an it bcrat that if I wait a bit, I can usurp on it. I'm still waiting for a response from en wikibooks. Slide Usurp (talk) 05:14, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Doesn't matter either way. Looks good to go forward tomorrow. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 14:57, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 06:24, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tigerfool → moho[edit]

Tigerfool (talk) 02:11, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 37 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 02:12, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Target name is in use at jawiki; however, SUL account doesn't exist. Kingturtle (talk) 12:00, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 00:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Irdicent → Anhamirak[edit]

Irdicent 23 00:17, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I created Anhamirak a few minutes ago as a doppelganger account, but now I want the user name. (Sorry!)

--Irdicent 23 00:17, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 5094 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:17, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Out of curiosity, may I ask why you keep changing your username? This is your fifth request in the past year. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:28, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really know, I have been trying to find a username that I really like. This is my final one-I mean it!! I really like this name so I won't change after this, ever! --Irdicent 23 00:31, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done This is your final change. Kingturtle (talk) 11:20, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Triple-DES → Auto[edit]

3DES / decltype (talk) 14:00, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 64 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:04, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Only edit from Auto (talk · contribs) is vandalism. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:55, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Target name was a vandalism only account. No need to wait. Kingturtle (talk) 11:27, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CaptainHMorgan → CaptainMorgan[edit]

CaptainHMorgan (talk) 03:55, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The target account made only minor edits (4 of them) nearly four years and has been inactive ever since. If the account holder does not object, I hope it can be believed that his/her minor edits and extended absence is a sign s/he is not wishing to be an active participant and therefore wouldn't mind relinquishing his/her username to someone that wishes to be an active member by the username I love. Since the turn of the century I've gone by the username CaptainMorgan in every Internet avenue where possible. I signed up to Wikipedia this past January, making positive contributions where I see fit while striving to be an active member of the community... I'd like to do so in the username I've used for so long that I've come to admire. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CaptainHMorgan (talkcontribs) 04:09, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 4 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 4 total edits. Requesting user has 30 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 03:56, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: everything is in order for 6 May. Kingturtle (talk) 12:06, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 17:38, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

nzskiwi → skiwi[edit]

Nzskiwi (talk) 03:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 4 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 4 total edits. Requesting user has 13 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 03:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the edits will be a problem. All four were vandalism, and were quickly reverted. J.delanoygabsadds 04:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Target name was a vandalism only account. No need to wait. Kingturtle (talk) 17:41, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tieum p → Nakor[edit]

Tieum p (talk) 14:42, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unification with my renamed fr.wiki account. Thanks in advance. Tieum p (talk) 14:42, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 119 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:44, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 7 May. Kingturtle (talk) 12:07, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 19:37, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Nakor (talk) 19:54, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


anabus_maximus → anabus[edit]

-anabus_maximus (Talk to me) 23:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:14, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Everything is in order for 7 May. Kingturtle (talk) 12:09, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kingturtle (talk) 19:38, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]