Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yitzhak Reiter

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2024 March 26.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yitzhak Reiter[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability and lack of references IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 08:04, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Full professor and chair with many publications including important textbooks. His books are reviewed: [1][2]. Researcher (Hebrew: חוקרת) (talk) 09:00, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Soft Keep. Individual appears to be highly cited and meets the basic WP:PROF guidelines, but the article needs a LOT of work, including references. If reliable, secondary sources can be identified for the information in the article, then it should stay. If not, then it should be treated as any other unsourced WP:BLP.nf utvol (talk) 14:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Military, Politics, Islam, and Israel. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:48, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. An editor-in-chief. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:44, 6 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Israel Academic Press is not a "major, well-established academic journal". Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 09:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per Nfutvol. Marokwitz (talk) 21:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The only references in the article are written by the subject of the article. The book reviews demonstrate notability, but this needs to be remedied as soon as possible, especially given this is a BLP. SportingFlyer T·C 12:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but requires improvement as stated above, because he meets notability but the article does not meet our standards FortunateSons (talk) 14:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Passing NAUTHOR at the very least. Also AFDISNOTCLEANUP and SNOW. gidonb (talk) 00:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.