Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slender Man

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:42, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Slender Man[edit]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Internet meme. Lacks any reliable secondary sources to establish notability per WP:WEB. Contested PROD. Uncle Dick (talk) 22:20, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Videos on this are nearing a thousand and its getting popular on numerous sites, its been mention on Coast to Coast with Art Bell —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.110.62.44 (talk) 23:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC) — 74.110.62.44 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete. Something Awful meme sourced from Something Awful, Something Awful and... Something Awful. Grow up, guys. Guy (Help!) 23:41, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It's becoming a more and more prominent phenomenon: it's more well known then half of the articles in the "Internet memes" category. The fact that the marble hornets videos are getting 60 000+ views within the first week of their release, plus the older videos having as many as half a million views is testament enough to that. SlightlyChaotic (talk) 02:03, 4 December 2010 (UTC)— SlightlyChaotic (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete. Maybe it could be kept if it were getting lots of coverage via reliable sources (or a lot of Gnews hits). Right now, the only "sources" I can find are blogs. Erpert (let's talk about it) 08:29, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Marble Hornets creators were featured in some online magaziene articles —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.64.6.40 (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It's far more prominent and noteworthy than many other internet memes and proper sources are certainly available, its the article itself that just needs to be improved. --Chaos Indy (talk) 13:02, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 06:39, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Erpert. A check for sourcing gives only blogs and meme related sites at the moment. This topic is well documented on such sites that collect memes, but I don't believe this meets the notability requirements for an entry in an encyclopedia. --Taelus (talk) 14:55, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.