Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Boll

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 11:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Boll[edit]

Paul Boll (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely fails WP:NSKATE. No medal placements at senior-level competitions. Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:33, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to 2006_German_Figure_Skating_Championships: Note that WP:NSKATE is indicative that sigcov is likely, and is not presumptive/determinative, so someone could meet none of the NSKATE criteria but still meet WP:SPORTCRIT for some reason. That said, Boll doesn't appear to have sigcov, so redirect him to the championship where he and Kolbe got their win as an ATD. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 01:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment: There are a whole bunch of similarly deficient nominations. Really, such blanket nominations without evidence of WP:BEFORE and consideration of WP:ATD should be all procedurally kept as WP:SKCRIT#3 given lack of a valid deletion rationale as WP:NSKATE is indicative that sigcov is likely, and is not presumptive/determinative, so someone could meet none of the NSKATE criteria but still meet WP:SPORTCRIT for some reason. That said, it's quite possible that most of these should be delete or redirect results. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 01:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Oppose redirect. Searches for Paul Boll find nothing on this one. There are more famous namesakes, such as Paul Boll, inventor of the Attrition Mill, or Paul Boll the late 19th century philologist. There is also an active researcher of that name. Not eligible for SK3. The issue is clearly notability, and this one is not notable. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.