Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parasites Without Borders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:G11, most likely undisclosed paid editing. – bradv🍁 18:34, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Parasites Without Borders[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This NGO is not notable enough and therefore fails GNG MistyGraceWhite (talk) 17:15, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 17:15, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Notability is not an evenly calibrated bar. Some subjects/topics are more or less notable and this one is notable enough given the sources. This NGO is also notable enough for the medical world as it is the publisher for a major medical textbook on infectious diseases. They also host a number of popular podcasts and have a huge following from both lay and professional audiences. GeorgeTopouria
I have blocked GeorgeTopouria, who is the creator of the article, for WP:UPE. MER-C 18:23, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:44, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - paid-for spam. MER-C 18:23, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete straight up paid for spam, no coverage. Praxidicae (talk) 18:24, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.