Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jormungand characters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 16:36, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of Jormungand characters[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced fancruft.--114.81.255.37 (talk) 06:56, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I completed the AfD for the IP. Ansh666 18:06, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:SPINOUT. Character lists are normally kept as an expansion of the plot not able to be covered on the main article. Per WP:BEFORE have you looked for sources regarding the characters? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:29, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Knowledgekid has covered the ground already. The issue of sources is of course an issue that should be seen to be even slightly addressed, but character articles generally have some allowance if it's a concise and reasonably written article (opposed to vehicle/equipment/terms etc). If they were individual articles than the need for notability is more important. There is a long standing consensus with these types of articles. SephyTheThird (talk) 21:36, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.