Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Digimon Adventure characters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:31, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Digimon Adventure characters[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page consists of plot summary only. There isn't any real world information to establish notability. Fangusu (talk) 13:51, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep Did you cross check the sources used in the article? I see some notable sources in the form of books and the like. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep No real reason presented for deletion or effort to fix the article issues, and nominator has an SPI against them currently. Nate • (chatter) 21:24, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An SPI in some cases doesn't effect the outcome of an AfD, in this case though I see no indication that the nominator checked the references present in the article. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:27, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mrschimpf: Please stop talking about my Sockpuppet Investigation. I am sorry about that misconduct. I don't think it is relevant to this AfD and, for another thing, I am not an evil person. Fangusu (talk) 02:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Even if the other Digimon character lists were deleted or merged, it would be fairly pointless to argue notability of the of the series' base Digimon Adventure characters. Glancing, there are over 100+ sources which seem fairly reliable. —Kirt^Message 06:27, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as properly sourced. VMS Mosaic (talk) 12:25, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.