Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hovhannes Mkrtchyan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Cirt (talk) 00:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hovhannes Mkrtchyan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ATHLETE. has not competed at highest level which is World Figure Skating Championships. LibStar (talk) 02:57, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep has competed at the highest level of national sport, and is a national silver medalist. Kolindigo (talk) 03:01, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

being a national medallist is not meeting WP:ATHLETE. LibStar (talk) 03:03, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - competing at World Junior level satisfies WP:ATHLETE. Ivanvector (talk) 02:33, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

no it doesn't, criterion 2 specifically says "People who have competed at the highest amateur level of a sport, usually considered to mean the Olympic Games or World Championships.". LibStar (talk) 03:09, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The World Junior Championship is the highest level available to junior athletes. Are you suggesting all junior athletes should be automatically excluded? Ivanvector (talk) 06:00, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

yes this precedent already exists in WP. if they are good enough they should translate over the highest level amateur. LibStar (talk) 06:04, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete "Junior Level" is not the "highest amateur level". In any case it fails the general notability guideline of significant coverage in reliable sources.--Pontificalibus (talk) 15:29, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.