Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GamgokJanghowon station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GamgokJanghowon station[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AFC not yet ready for mainspace, moved to articlespace by non-reviewer. Article is 1 sentence stating nothing about the subject other than it exists. Article also only has one source. Train stations are not inherently notable per WP:NTRAINSTATION. Shadow311 (talk) 13:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shadow311 (talk) 13:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here are a few other examples of unremarkable documents

Namwon station

Gongju station

Gimje station

should also be discussed for deletion? SeolhwaMyeonggoktoAnsim (talk) 15:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
+

Myeongbong station

Iyang station

Neungju station

Hwasun station

Nampyeong station

Hyocheon station

Seogwangju station

Dongsongjeong station SeolhwaMyeonggoktoAnsim (talk) 15:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 17:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify pending further improvements. Not yet ready for mainspace, no notability demonstrated. Happy to reconsider if the article improves in the next 7 days, please {{ping}} me. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 18:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Stations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Jungbunaeryuk Line and draftify. It's a likely search target, and there's no evidence of meeting GNG with the current state of the article, but as a newly-built station there's a good chance that significant coverage can be found. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jungbunaeryuk Line documentation is not yet complete as there is uncertain information and the Line is not yet completed and has been under construction for some time.

However, it is noteworthy that the

There is a station location and station name conflict

There is a conflict between Icheon-si, Gyeonggi-do and Eumseong-gun, Chungcheongbuk-do due to a double-digit meter difference in location, I will add soon SeolhwaMyeonggoktoAnsim (talk) 15:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I've added new content, so can I delete the sad AfD message? SeolhwaMyeonggoktoAnsim (talk) 15:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I can find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG:

"'장호원감곡역' vs '감곡장호원역'… 철도역명 놓고 등돌린 이웃사촌". 문화일보 (in Korean). Retrieved 2024-05-04.
최찬흥 (2021-05-24). "장호원감곡역 vs 감곡장호원역…이천시-음성군 '역명 다툼'". 연합뉴스 (in Korean). Retrieved 2024-05-04.
"중부내륙선 음성 감곡장호원역 12월 개통". 충북뉴스 (in Korean). 2021-11-16. Retrieved 2024-05-04.

Jumpytoo Talk 23:32, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep sources shared by Jumpytoo establish notability. Garuda3 (talk) 07:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I just supplemented the content using more than just the sources he provided. SeolhwaMyeonggoktoAnsim (talk) 15:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sources satisfy WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.