Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fan criticism of George Lucas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:07, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fan criticism of George Lucas[edit]

Poorly sourced original research. Soapboxing by those who dislike the newer Star Wars movies. Seems more like a collaborative effort to write an essay than an encyclopedia article. Massive inherent POV problems. MartinDK 14:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is WP precedent that articles such as these (compare "inconsistencies in the Star Trek Canon") are to be deleteed. Allon Fambrizzi 17:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Allon Fambrizzi[reply]
Delete no original research, badly sourced. If any decent stuff on these films can be found then it can be put in the article on the film in question. Hut 8.5 18:12, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Hut 8.5. JuJube 02:29, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. That {{unreferenced}} hasn't been up there for half a year for nothing. Krimpet 09:32, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I cannot see how with this premise this article can ever become referenced and NPOV. Kazmarov 04:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I'd be willing to work on this article to bring it up to standard. .V. _[_Talk|Email] 05:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete shot first Savidan 06:05, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Rhindle The Red 04:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.