Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eat This Much

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eat This Much[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Eat This Much (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:PRODUCT at the moment, unfortunately. The CNN article seems borderline, but I could not find anything else meeting even that standard. Broader topic of "meal planning service" might satisfy NLIST though, in which case it may be possible to mention and redirect it there in the future. Alpha3031 (t • c) 13:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 04:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The Washington Post, CNN, and Lifehacker sources should lift this over the bar for GNG and NCORP (which applies here; it seems like the product is synonymous with the company). Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • As I understand it, Lifehacker was not considered reliable back when it was owned by Gawker, which it was back in 2013, which is what the review is dated as, Dclemens1971. It has changed ownership twice since then though, so it might be worth bumping it up to RSN for future articles. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    My bad on Lifehacker. And on second look, the CNN source is from "CNN Underscored," which says: "Content is created by CNN Underscored’s team of editors who work independently from the CNN newsroom." No RSN discussions but it does appear to be a promotional platform of questionable independence and reliability. That leaves just WaPo, which is not "multiple," so I'll switch my !vote to delete. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: A meal planning app does meet WP:WEB (apps and technology). Following the sources which is applicable to GNG, I have no doubt that there WP:NEXIST and is WP:SUSTAINED too. Having this clearly is a strong move to WP:NCORP. If the CNN were there and it's reliable, WP:N & WP:RS. It does need sourcing. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 11:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not sure what you mean by citing WP:NEXIST, SafariScribe are you implying I should have looked some specific places for my BEFORE that I may have missed? The Yahoo Finance article is from Market Wired, it's a press release. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Give me time to analyse the article. I am not at home and will see it off when I reach home. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 16:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per nom. Not much for notability here. Orientls (talk) 17:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Eat_This_Much&oldid=1224869301"