Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carrier Air Group TEN

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of United States Navy aircraft wings. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carrier Air Group TEN

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage in reliable sources. Citation 1, while reliable, contains nothing more than the dates during which this formation existed [1]. Citations 2-4 seem to be self-published blogs and thus not reliable. Citation 5 seems to be about a different unit entirely, and citation 6 is a dead link that isn't in the Internet Archive. While I don't doubt that this unit existed, there is no evidence that it deserves a standalone article. Toadspike (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This formation has an entry at List of United States Navy aircraft wings. I would support that page as a redirect target. Toadspike (talk) 19:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United States of America. Owen× ☎ 20:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of United States Navy aircraft wings - Per Toadspike. - ZLEA _T\^C 14:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Subject is notable. WP:BEFORE seems to have overlooked Morison, Lundstrom, Hammel, and books on the Battle of Santa Cruz or the Battle of Philippine Sea. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hawkeye7 Same comment as at AfD Carrier Air Group SIX – you can't just drop some names and leave it at that. I am assuming in good faith that these books exist – you are, after all, an experienced and competent editor – but I would like to be able to verify that this Air Group receives significant coverage in those books you mentioned. Toadspike (talk) 08:14, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Carrier Air Wing Ten. All of the other WW2 era (with the exception of the Enterprise Air Group page) have their history in the pages of the Air Wings that succeeded them after that 1940s. Tdhla1 (talk) 00:56, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carrier Air Wing Ten is not the same formation though. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Hawkeye7 here, this is a different formation. Toadspike (talk) 08:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 21:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.