Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Senegal Flight 301

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Air Senegal Flight 301[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor aviation incident, no fatalaties. WP:NOTNEWS. TheLongTone (talk) 13:28, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those are critical mechanical failures, we can't confirm this was a mechanical failure until we get the final report, this will most likely be up in the air as a dispute for a while. 75.174.157.86 (talk) 22:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:WHATABOUTX is not an argument. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 02:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have not proven anything whatsoever. You have not cited any guidelines to state why this article should be kept. Stating that an article should be kept because other ones exist is not an argument. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 02:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube is not a reliable source. Nor is Google. Simonm223 (talk) 12:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - There was 10 injuries and making aviation news, coverage all over the internet. What a silly nomination. Artecta (talk) 13:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This has been previously discussed in 2024 In Aviation's talk page, overrun incidents such as the Myanmar Airforce crash at the beginning of the year are non notable. Check the talk page for 2024 in Aviation please. I also believe that through time this will not be a lasting incident and will fail WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE, unless one of the 4 seriously injured die this incident is non notable. Lolzer3000 (talk) 20:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
this is a debate not an arguement please keep it civil. Lolzer3000 (talk) 14:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Aviation, and Senegal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: run-of-the-mill runway excursion, newsworthy but not notable. WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE and WP:LASTING effects highly unlikely. Rosbif73 (talk) 15:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
to add onto this, there is light coverage spilling over into 5/10/24, but i do not think this will last into monday, we'll see though. Lolzer3000 (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I second this. Delete. same with the JSX and FexEx. IDKUggaBanga (talk) 17:39, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to delete this why you don't delete other articles like United express 4933 that have only 3 injuries and a lot less damage to the aircraft? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SignorPignolini (talk • contribs) 20:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

United Express 4933 missed the runway entirely, this did not. Lolzer3000 (talk) 20:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

that was for multiple factors such as fatigued crew, broken ils and poor visibility causing it to land off the runway. this is just a 737 rippin it off the end of the runway. this is less of a important topic than the united accident. IDKUggaBanga (talk) 21:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

someone's angy. but in all seriousness, if someone ends up dying due to this accident, then it will probably be re-added, so just wait and see. IDKUggaBanga (talk) 12:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The creator is typing their responses in bold and is attacking everyone who is voting to delete and is already bludgeoning the nomination. I'd advise to take a break as further continuation of this can lead to a ANI discussion which is the last everyone needs. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 12:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Current ANI discussion. Possible sockpuppet of GeekyAviation/Tyhaliburtn with similar behavior pattern. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 12:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i'm the creator of this article and not the guy who is typing in bold. If my article doesn't meet the Wikipedia notabilty criteria you have the right to delete it, but i think that 10 injuries and an half burned plane are notabile enough so take the decision to delete it carefully SignorPignolini (talk) 16:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I just assumed that it was that person since they kind of took it personal with their comments. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi'ed to stop the disruption and allow for consensus to emerge. If this is relisted, feel free to adjust protection length. Star Mississippi 15:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Coverage has already died down failing WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE. Although if in the end, this accident does end up having lasting effects, I would agree with an undeletion. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 14:29, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Blaise Diagne International Airport#Accidents and incidents, where a two sentence summary is present. That's really all that needs to be said about this accident, it does not meet our notability guidelines for a standalone article. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 01:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per to WP:AIRCRASH, a minor incident like this shouldn't be incorporated into the airport article, let alone warrant its own standalone article. Ckfasdf (talk) 05:38, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.