Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Polish Rally Championship

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 11:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Polish Rally Championship[edit]

2023 Polish Rally Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under SNG or GNG. Possibly with a bit of "wp:not" thrown in for being just stats. I would like to request a thorough / longer review of this because it is an example of many sitting in the que that I've been avoiding reviewing and this might help provide guidance. "Stats only" sources for a "stats only" article. (although this is at the "better end" of that spectrum because the stats has more info than just who won) And on a topic which is not given presumed notability by the SNG. Has no GNG sources. Unable to find GNG sources for the topic, mostly likely because they are unlikely to exist. Of course non-GNG coverage of events within the topic exists, but that misses by two criteria (not about the topic of the article and not GNG depth). I recently posted at project sports to try to learn the lay of the land of opinion on these (i.e. whether to "bend the wp:notability rules on these) and it seems that the answer is not.

The only prose content (2 sentences) is what is already contained at the higher level Polish Rally Championship article. North8000 (talk) 15:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.