User talk:Susmuffin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has extended confirmed rights on the English Wikipedia.
Trout this user
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
VANDALISM THREAT
Guarded __ __ __ __ __
There is no Cabal

A barnstar for your efforts[edit]

The Current Events Barnstar
Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC)
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
Awarded for efforts in expanding multiple articles to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC)

george macdonald[edit]

why did "that long list" need to be removed? this is from your december edits 50.126.71.214 (talk) 23:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was a massive list of names that added little information about George MacDonald to his article's lead. Furthermore, a list of that length encourages editors to indiscriminately add more random people and much of it was uncited. ―Susmuffin Talk 16:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This week's article for improvement (week 21, 2024)[edit]

Hello, Susmuffin. The article for improvement of the week is:

News program

Please be bold and help improve it!


Previous selections: Tax return • Ancient Egyptian architecture


Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

Tech News: 2024-21[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the talk page message, but is this article is ready for FAC? — 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 14:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything that needs to be added to the article? Has anything changed since the incident was heavily in the news? ―Susmuffin Talk 06:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's some info about Cenat not getting any charges that's not in the article. 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 09:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You should probably put that in there, assuming that it has been discussed by reliable sources. ―Susmuffin Talk 11:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done ― Anything else? — 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 11:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article largely looks fine. I would be careful about citing the National Review in an article on a riot. ―Susmuffin Talk 14:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]