User talk:Phuzion/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re: Thanks for keeping an eye out

Thanks for the nice note on my talk page, I appreciate it. :-) Soltak | Talk 23:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Dear Phuzion,
Thank you for your attempt to protect article History of Mongolia from "vandalism". I have written the most part of the article History of Mongolia and I know how to develop it further. I am trying to edit it. Please do not intrude and please don't offend me calling me a vandal. I was going to move the content of the "Manchu period" section to "Manchu Conquest" section. Now I am going to merge these two sections. Please be careful using rude words such as "vandal". Gantuya eng 04:53, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
And why have deleted the picture of the deer stone?!Gantuya eng 04:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I was out of the mood. Please excuse me if was too harsh. Gantuya eng 08:42, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Hiya, its me (The-medusa), ok I edited a page on the 30th Nov weapon section because as this game comes out in Eur 9th nov, people come to page and see why there are no list of weapons. Until the 9th comes there should be a list and also until there is a FAQ of game. You can email to discuss at simsward007@hotmail.com and take your time, I have all-year:) —Preceding unsigned comment added by The-medusa (talk • contribs) 11:04, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't realise I couldn't delete it. VillaFanSam 23:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Sleeping dogs

Dancing Stage MegaMiX wasn't complete, which is why it was in the sandbox. Now instead of properly polishing the article I have to quickly tie it off, you didn't even proof read it. I know you were trying to help, but did you know what was going on? --AeronPrometheus (talk) 13:33, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Are you trying to be funny? Thanks for moving the page back but next time don't, A, create a new user sub-page when it already had a sandbox, B, redirect a wiki page to said new user sub-page. I corrected the redirect, if having an empty page is going to set off alarms I'm sending them to you. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 22:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Bemani article

The list of DDR games was badly formed and out of date, and redundant. Is there really a need to have a "sample" list when the full list is a link away? I realize that it sorta looks out of place at the moment, but as far as style is concerned there's a great deal of work that needs to be done to that article. All I did was touch the area that my current project is focused on. I plan on doing other Bemani series when I'm done... in 2021. If you really hate the changes made switch it back, I'll come back and repair the whole page when I have time. Also please explain to me the misuse of the Main Article template and demonstrate how I was suppose to use it. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 08:10, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

That is not how the Main Article template has to work, all that is required is a description of the information. There doesn't need to be a repeated piece of the list. Deleting information is one thing, replace it with better prose and formatting is another and it's something ALL the Bemani articles sorely need. Don't wait for a big event ot make changes you know are needed, this is Wikipedia, go make the list articles now even if all they are is stubs to start with. Then additional editing can occur along the right path as people find it in them to add to it. I can tell that you actually care about these articles, sometimes I feel alone in that gesture, but don't limit yourself. And if you feel that you cannot take on that kind of a project now why are you denying others the right to make the needed gradual changes? --AeronPrometheus (talk) 08:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Capitol idea, gimme a minute to give the list a look over. Prolly should have refreshed the whole page when I made those changes, I guess I need to follow my own advice. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 08:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)


Unsigned or improperly signed comments from my original page

OK, I can see now how you believe that my edit to the Crossley Heath school was not neutral. Thank you, Londoner.


you are not a nice person — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuk Da Police (talk • contribs) 14:04, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

IRC cloak request

I am Phuzion on freenode and I would like the cloak wikipedia/phuzion. Thanks. --Phuzion (talk) 22:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Rhetorical device

Thanks for catching that. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 01:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey Phuzion

Thank you for your understanding. I will do what you recommended. I was not sure how to do the talk thingee. now i know —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.2.178.153 (talk) 03:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Tildes

What is the purpose of Tildes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.2.178.153 (talk) 03:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

List of Revere High School IP addresses

User_talk:204.11.191.49

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Taskforce for BEMANI

I have created a taskforce, and I hope you express interest on it (: Fireblaster lyz (talk) 15:57, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

AHHHH WRITING ON MY OWN TALK PAGE NO WAI!!!

http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=257

Huggle User Category

Hi there. I have seen that you use huggle by the fact that you have automatically updated the huggle white list(it does this when closing huggle). I was wondering if you would add the category [[Category:Wikipedians who use Huggle]] to your user page so that it fills out and we know who actually uses huggle. If you do not want to you do not have to. I am also sorry if i have already talked to you about this or you no longer use huggle but i sent it to everyone that has edited the page since mid January. I hope we can start to fill out this category. If you would like to reply to this message then please reply on my talk page as i will probably not check here again. Thanks. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 18:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Huggle Category Problem

Hi there.You are receiving this message from me as you have not added your huggle category correctly. At the moment on category here you can see that you are sorted under the letter U. To fix this please change the [[Category:Wikipedians who use Huggle]] to [[Category:Wikipedians who use Huggle|YOURNICKNAMEHERE]]. This will fix the problem. If you do not change this within a few days then i will do this for you but i would prefer to send you a message like this than just go and change your page. If you want to contact me then please use my talk page as i will not be checking back here. Thanks for your help. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 16:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

It's ok. I took care of it. Enigma msg! 03:05, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

ChrisAKAOscar (talk) 01:23, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Please comment

Please comment here. MisterE2123Five3 (talk) 07:09, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Maxwell Show

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Maxwell Show, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Maxwell Show. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. MisterE2123Five5 (talk) 06:59, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

QUESTIONS ABOUT NORTHERNSMOKE

I guess im a little confused this is my first article and i am trying to edit it but it was marked for deletion when i hit save to preview the page and now its deleted. what was i missing from the page to have it deleted so suddenly —Preceding unsigned comment added by Travislilley (talk • contribs) 14:22, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Edit of Papaveraceae

Hi Phuzion,

I changed the sentence around because it sounds like Ranunculales is the "poppy family". I believe it's more clear when it's written "Papaveraceae, informally known as..." (At least for non-botanists...or non-taxonomists, generally). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.220.247.232 (talk) 05:29, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

You undid the Qatar Vandal's work. He undid your work.. I undid his work and saved a copy of the original for my own information. I do not believe altering my wording is allowed.


http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Haplogroup_J1_(Y-DNA)&action=history

(cur | prev) 11:52, 7 August 2011 JohnLloydScharf (talk | contribs) (65,359 bytes) (Undid revision 443487652 by 89.211.50.131 (talk)) (undo) (cur | prev) 11:52, 7 August 2011 JohnLloydScharf (talk | contribs) (65,419 bytes) (Undid revision 443489094 by 89.211.50.131 (talk)) (undo) (cur | prev) 11:49, 7 August 2011 JohnLloydScharf (talk | contribs) (65,107 bytes) (Undid revision 443489238 by 89.211.50.131 (talk)) (undo) (cur | prev) 11:49, 7 August 2011 JohnLloydScharf (talk | contribs) (65,123 bytes) (Undid revision 443489478 by 89.211.50.131 (talk)) (undo) (cur | prev) 11:47, 7 August 2011 JohnLloydScharf (talk | contribs) (65,151 bytes) (Undid revision 443489578 by 89.211.50.131 (talk)) (undo) (cur | prev) 10:45, 7 August 2011 89.211.50.131 (talk) (65,154 bytes) (→Map depicts J1 M267*G variant rather than being a map of J1 Haplogroup in general.) (undo) (cur | prev) 10:44, 7 August 2011 89.211.50.131 (talk) (65,151 bytes) (→Map depicts J1 M267*G variant rather than being a map of J1 Haplogroup in general.) (undo) (cur | prev) 10:41, 7 August 2011 89.211.50.131 (talk) (65,123 bytes) (→Map depicts J1 M267*G variant rather than being a map of J1 Haplogroup in general.) (undo) (cur | prev) 10:40, 7 August 2011 89.211.50.131 (talk) (65,107 bytes) (→Daghestani J1 tends to be different from Arabic J1.[citation needed]) (undo) (cur | prev) 10:25, 7 August 2011 89.211.50.131 (talk) (65,419 bytes) (→Daghestani J1 tends to be different from Arabic J1.[citation needed]) (undo) (cur | prev) 10:23, 7 August 2011 89.211.50.131 (talk) (65,359 bytes) (undo) (cur | prev) 10:19, 7 August 2011 Phuzion (talk | contribs) m (64,401 bytes) (Reverted edits by 89.211.50.131 (talk) to last revision by Andrew Lancaster (HG)) (undo) (cur | prev) 10:19, 7 August 2011 89.211.50.131 (talk) (65,359 bytes) (→Daghestani J1 tends to be different from Arabic J1.[citation needed]) (undo)

JohnLloydScharf (talk) 12:15, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Also see: http://wpedia.goo.ne.jp/enwiki/User_talk:89.211.50.131

JohnLloydScharf (talk) 12:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

User RKC Vakwai

Hi, you recently left a discussion note with this user, and this user has decided to re-direct my talk page, do you have any power to fix this or even ban that user who keeps editing pages incorrectly and has now simply destroyed my talk history. Druryfire (talk) 11:10, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 7e88e1b6afdc944fecbe772a9e4628ec

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Your edits

Just to let you know that people performing edits with the default edit summary of "clean up" often run into trouble in my experience (not me, but other people). Also, edits that have no visible effect are generally frowned upon by the community. You can utilise more of AWB's skip options to avoid these and thus enjoy a more stressfree existence :) Regards, - Jarry1250 [Weasel? Discuss.] 20:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed major re-org at Mukkulathor

Greetings, based on your recent participation in the article, I'd like to invite you to: Talk:Mukkulathor#Suggest_major_reorganisation_of_the_article. Thanks for your input! MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:47, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Phuzion! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only. 
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Membership of the Counter-Vandalism Unit

As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.

You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:45, 30 October 2011 (UTC).


Oregon State edit was constructive an and attempt to clarify information that is factual and not represented in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlackSweat415 (talk • contribs) 23:12, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikify LTAP tag

It would help if you said what you thought the article needs. Thanks, --Triskele Jim (talk) 17:07, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Phuzion, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Orphan Wiki (talk) 10:34, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

"Correcting" other languages

In Prekmurje dialect, you "fixed" some spelling mistakes which capitalised non-English words (specifically, "april", "mali", "september", "december", in Slovene and Prekmurian).

If you’re going to fix typos, please double-check that what you are changing is actually English. -- pne (talk) 12:29, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Phuzion. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Date formats

Hi Phuzion, read the MOS properly, you will see that once the date formats are set in, then they are set. There is a clause, look for it. It is also British English article, so the date formats are acceptable. scope_creep (talk) 08:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Phuzion. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

October 2018

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to List of costly or deadly hailstorms: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Stanley Appleford (talk) 18:38, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Phuzion. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of University Toolkit

Notice

The article University Toolkit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable piece of software

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 09:28, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

You are now a pending changes reviewer!

Hi Phuzion! I've been running into you while patrolling logs and recent changes and I happened to notice that you don't have the pending changes reviewer user rights. I hope you don't mind, but I went through your contributions and I noticed that you're quite active in recent changes patrolling and that you consistently view and undo vandalism and bad faith disruption. I believe that the pending changes reviewer rights would be useful for you to have and that you'd make good use of the tool. Instead of having you formally request the pending changes reviewer right at WP:PERM, I went ahead and just gave it to you. This user right allows you to review edits that are pending approval on pages currently under pending changes protection and either accept the edits to make them viewable by the general public, or decline and revert them.

Keep these things in mind regarding the tool or when you're reviewing any pending changes:

  • A list of articles with pending edits awaiting review can be viewed at Special:PendingChanges.
  • A list of the articles currently under pending changes protection can be viewed at Special:StablePages.
  • Being granted and having these rights does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you (obviously).
  • You'll generally want to accept any pending changes that appear to be legitimate edits and are not blatant vandalism or disruption, and reject edits that are problematic or that you wouldn't accept yourself.
  • Never accept any pending changes that contain obvious and clear vandalism, blatant neutral point of view issues, copyright violations, or BLP violations.

Useful guidelines and pages for you to read:

I'm sure you'll do fine with the reviewer rights - it's a pretty straight-forward tool and it doesn't drastically change the interface that you're used to already. Nonetheless, please don't hesitate to leave me a message on my user talk page if you run into any questions, get stuck anywhere, or if you're not sure if you should accept or revert pending changes to a page, and I'll be more than be happy to help you. If you no longer want the pending changes reviewer rights, let me know and I'll be happy to remove it for you. Thank you for helping to patrol recent changes and keep Wikipedia free of disruption and vandalism - it's a very thankless job to perform and I want you to know that it doesn't go unnoticed and that I appreciate it very much. Happy editing! :-D ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:33, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

I already said thanks in IRC, but thanks again! I'm glad that my work fighting vandalism is being recognized. Phuzion (talk) 19:48, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Politically neutral?!

With all due respect, even you don't believe yourself when you claim content is politically neutral. I made two edits that changed the content from propaganda to neutral and factual. And you immediately sent me a message rejecting my edits because they didn't comport to your personal agenda.

If nothing else, you're a cautionary tale about the failings of government schools. My condolences on your intellectual and moral cowardice. 

  ````  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:2890:8D80:E1BD:B7DF:51C0:B294 (talk) 01:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bedford, Ohio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bedford High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

User:Majavah/Aligner now supports using the syntax highlighter

Hi, just wanted to let you know that Aligner should now work when you are using the syntax highlighter. It might require a WP:REFRESH to pick up the changes. – Majavah (t/c) 05:16, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

... and now it supports articles with more than one infobox! Also just let me know if you come across infoboxes that are not recognized by the template so I can fix them. – Majavah (t/c) 12:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you so incredibly much! You have no idea how helpful this is! I'll definitely test the heck out of this and let you know about any issues I find with it. I appreciate your work so much! Phuzion (talk) 13:04, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

User:Nikkutendo Wants to apologize and also give thanks

Hello. I would like to apologize for using your/the picture of the BESM 4th Edition cover and claiming it as my own. That was not my intention as I just wanted to change the cover art of Big Eyes Small Mouth book to the current edition. If you are/were the creator of the cover art, you did one amazing picture.

Thank you for making the change to the Wiki article and helping to fix the picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikkutendo (talk • contribs) 17:26, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

sorry for the inconvenience

sorry for that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tejaskapoor22 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

hello phuzion

hello this is mehboob working on the article of sajid ali thahim sahab we are making it tobe perfect and look well and good you are requested to remove deletion tag thanks

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anita Thompson Dickinson Reynolds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Bell (Ohio politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pennsboro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Your UTRS Account

You have no wikis in which you meet the requirements for UTRS. Your account has been removed and you will be required to reregister once you meet the requirements. If you are blocked on any wiki that UTRS uses, please resolve that before registering agian also. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Fairview Hospital (Cleveland)

Hello, Phuzion. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fairview Hospital".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:24, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Josiah A. Harris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Hoadley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

stop undoing my constructive amazing edits

i hate you Hate Hatred 38.140.208.178 (talk) 15:39, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

september 2020

how do you instantly revert my edits but you cant respond to your own talk page [[38.140.208.178 (talk) 15:43, 29 March 2021 (UTC)]] 38.140.208.178 (talk) 15:42, 29 March 2021 (UTC) 38.140.208.178 (talk) 15:42, 29 March 2021 (UTC) 38.140.208.178 (talk) 15:42, 29 March 2021 (UTC) 38.140.208.178 (talk) 15:42, 29 March 2021 (UTC) 38.140.208.178 (talk) 15:42, 29 March 2021 (UTC)


hatred

April 2021

Hi. PixieCat7 (talk) 04:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC) Hope I signed that right

Yes, you did sign it right. Thanks for the message! Phuzion (talk) 04:12, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Pending Changes Problems

@Phuzion: Tested on page Brian Lara, now automatically accepted. Thank you. DiamondIIIXX (talk) 04:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Confirming etherpad edits

Hi, this is phuzion, confirming the etherpad edits regarding #wikipedia-bag on Freenode are me.

The commands to run are:

/msg ChanServ SET #wikipedia-bag KEEPTOPIC ON

/msg ChanServ SET #wikipedia-bag MLOCK +ift #wikimedia-libera

/msg ChanServ CLEAR #wikipedia-bag USERS This channel has moved to Libera.Chat, see https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/IRC/Migrating_to_Libera_Chat

Phuzion (talk) 20:36, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Please, let us edit what and how we want to.

i saw some spelling errors and just simply needed to edit them, stop banning me 128.254.249.60 (talk) 20:39, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

I completely agree. If you don't let us say stuff in english, then please do t yourselves, wikipedia. Coolflame2023 (talk) 21:14, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

All I did was correct some spelling! Why would you ban me?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.139.16.94 (talk) 16:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

About the edit

Aight i was just trying to troll my friend, sorry about that NotAThrowayaccountability (talk) 03:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Gamebook Page edit

Wht external links count as inappropriate? I wasn't trying to advertise the product, which I think is the reason you removed those. Sorry if I made a mistake, I just wanted to have some links to what the page was referencing. Rake2005 (talk) 16:58, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

I removed the external links you added to the Gamebook article because they did not appear to contribute to the article. Additionally, the copyright status of the content on the links is unclear. Finally, one of the links you added was broken. If you have further questions, please feel free to ask. Thanks. Phuzion (talk) 17:11, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Harvard College versus Harvard University (and Harvard Law School)

Greetings Phuzion! Please note that Harvard College is categorized separately from Harvard Law School, so an article subject who received both an undergraduate degree and a law degree from Harvard would be separately categorized in Category:Harvard College alumni and Category:Harvard Law School alumni. While it is correct to remove Category:Harvard University alumni as redundant, where there is a separate undergraduate degree from Harvard this should be replaced with the Harvard College category. BD2412 T 23:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up, my apologies for the erroneous error. I'll strive to do better in the future. Phuzion (talk) 23:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Thank you, for your contributions. Cheers! BD2412 T 01:23, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

5 yen coin

I'm not sure what you were trying to do here, but your edit gutted over half of the article with an edit summary of "fixed an invalid parameter"? I saw the problem and fixed it so I thank you for doing that. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Sorry about that, that wasn't my intention. I'm looking into exactly what happened, but I think I might have been unintentionally editing an old revision of the page. Thanks for catching my mistake and fixing it. Phuzion (talk) 14:19, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
No problem! =) Yeah, it looks like the issue to me as I thought it was strange that the most recent coinage figures were reverted back to 2018. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:21, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

OWA OWA

CCP Global

Hi. The author contested deletion on the article talk page, saying the organization is notable; from the description, I suspect it probably is. I pointed out he needed to cite reliable sources in the near future or the article would still get deleted.

Thanks for watching over our content! —A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 16:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Draft:The Scratch 3.0 Show

I've literally done everything to make my page perfect, phuzion! What else does it need? It's in-depth, reliable, secondary, & independent! Jellybull (talk) 15:55, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

@Jellybull: As I mentioned in my decline reason, the references you have used for your draft are a YouTube video and two pages published by the subject of the draft. These are not usable as reliable sources. Per WP:REPUTABLE, "articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." If you have further questions, you are welcome to join the Teahouse, where volunteers will be happy to assist you with your draft. Phuzion (talk) 16:07, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Note

Hi, i noticed the author decided to publish the Draft:Avraal Sahir without any improvement, even though you declined it previously. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:23, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Bulletproof Soul

Hi! Thanks for the citation notes on Draft:Bulletproof Soul. I added sourcing in place of all [citation needed]. The added sources included 2 magazines and one other source. In some places I used multiple sources.

In reference to the artists in the group and Midnight Marauders, we can use multiple sources within the 11 references narrowed down if need be, these facts are mentioned in most of the sourcing, but the sources added are also reputable and I imagine Hype Magazine and Vents Magazine have been used to source plenty of other topics.

Also, the William Morris poem is seen on the album cover, plus a columnist mentions it in Hype Mag, which you can see I included. Something you can read on the album cover shouldn't need citing though, no? This is something you can cite from almost any of the references that show the album cover anyways because William Morris is credited on the cover. Should it be worded differently to say he is credited on the cover?

Please see the history on 15:38, 14 October 2023‎. Some things we should remove if need be surely. The abbreviation (though sourced) & "creating content around concepts such as human rights, community, and labor rights" might just be unnecessary inclusions for now, though sourced. Thoughts? Anonamistad (talk) 02:48, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Update. I went ahead and adjusted these things, as well as completely replaced those sources with suitable sources. Anonamistad (talk) 15:36, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Draft:DoubleDown Interactive

I was going to add a reference from GlobeNewswire (url: https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2021/09/14/2296508/0/en/DoubleDown-Interactive-Launches-Undead-World-Hero-Survival.html), but I read it was a press release distributor. But I've seen press releases referenced on other published articles on Wikipedia, so are they outdated and need to be updated? Or does referencing a press release depend on the article you're writing? KasaibouF29 (talk) 15:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

@KasaibouF29: As a reminder, Wikipedia is a work in progress. Just because something exists in article space does not mean that it follows all policies and guidelines. As a reminder, press releases from the subject of an article are not independent, because they are written by the subject of said article. Indeed, there are many articles out there with press releases as references, however, we will not accept articles through the AfC process that have them. I'd recommend WP:RS thoroughly to understand what does and does not count as a reliable source. If you have any further questions, please feel free to respond here on my talk page! Thanks for you interest in contributing to Wikipedia! Phuzion (talk) 15:44, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Nadia Heshmati

Hi Phuzion, I would be interested in your thoughts on this article. I was looking at it when you nominated it for CSD, but it isn't entirely unsourced - there does appear to be some credibility to the claims. That said, the article also seems to be written from a very... angry perspective. Maybe CSD is the right way to go? I'm not entirely sure - I fixed the formatting of the source and removed everything that wasn't supported by that - but I was wondering if you had more experience of what to do in that area. LittlePuppers (talk) 23:01, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

@LittlePuppers: If nothing else, the article (in its prior state) clearly fails WP:NPOV, which was one of my primary considerations when CSDing it. Additionally, I think the subject fails WP:NPERSON. While it may not have strictly met the criteria for WP:ATP, I do think that the article should likely be CSD'd. Happy to discuss further. Phuzion (talk) 23:13, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Fair enough, I'd be very surprised if the editor makes it neutral, and I'm seeing little by way of sources outside of court documents and one (possibly run-of-the-mill?) newspaper article. I'll return the CSD tag, and leave it up to the admin. LittlePuppers (talk) 23:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello Phuzion:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 3000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Kevin Eliceiri

Just FYI, I had marked this under review and was cleaning up prior to your decline. Going to approve it after cleanup in case you want to re-review or send it to AfD. Outside of the tone which I am cleaning up, meets WP:NSCHOLAR based on the amount his work is cited and the fellowships. CNMall41 (talk) 03:57, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

@CNMall41: Ah, my apologies, I missed that you'd tagged it as under review. Thanks for cleaning it up and publishing. My only concern with the article in its current state is the over-reliance on wisc.edu sources, which appear to be connected sources. But I'll trust your judgment on this one. Thanks for the heads up. Phuzion (talk) 04:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
No biggie. These AfC drives can make us easily overlook things. I believe I have done it in the past as well. I honestly HATE the low bar set by WP:NACADEMIC but it is what it is. I am sure this would survive AfD so I cleaned up the most blatant issues and tagged it for exactly what you mentioned. Of course, I am not immune from second opinions and will never be upset if someone takes an AfC approval to AfD. Good luck in the backlog drive!!--CNMall41 (talk) 04:08, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
On another note, I normally never mark something as under review but since the backlog drive is going I thought it best. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:11, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Saeed Bharam

No objection to the decline. But I think your script went a little crazy.[1] One of the pre-existing comments got duplicated a few times. DMacks (talk) 00:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up, I've tried to clean up the comments a bit, hopefully that makes things a bit easier to work with. Phuzion (talk) 00:26, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Super, thanks. DMacks (talk) 01:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

We love superman — Preceding unsigned comment added by What1264 (talk • contribs) 18:34, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in AfC November 2023 Backlog Drive

The Invisible Barnstar
Thank you for your participation in the Articles for Creation's November 2023 Backlog Drive! You made a total of 21 reviews, for a total of 31.5 points. – robertsky (talk) 06:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays!


– robertsky (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

– robertsky (talk) 06:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Please explain...

You berated me on my talk page about submitting others' articles which were not ready for submission, then told me I was 'suspicious' with no explanation. If you are referring to Paul D'Andrea, the citations were reverted by another party back to someone else's incorrect submission. I have reverted them back. Please do not revert it again so this remains correct. I will now resubmit as the article is ready. Otherwise, if you have some other pages that you are referring to, please list them so I am aware of what you are talking about. Finally, I have to COI to declare, so the quip about suspicious is unfounded. I do not know the subject. Thanks Phuzion Geraldine Aino (talk) 17:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Phuzion/Archive_1&oldid=1222644574"