User talk:PadFoot2008

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disambiguation link notification for April 5[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dhundari language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marwari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Northwest India
added links pointing to Demetrius I, Pala dynasty, AJK and Jammu and Kashmir

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tagore family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Noble.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A small help[edit]

Could you please review the article on the Gupta-Saka War? It is mentioned in a source (though I'm unsure of its reliability) that the Guptas captured Sindh from the Sakas. However, during the same period, the Sassanids, followed by the Rai dynasty, were ruling over Sindh. DeepstoneV (talk) 19:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DeepstoneV, I am not sure but as far as I am aware, the Magadhan Empire under the Gupta dynasty never directly ruled western states (like Malwa for instance). The western parts of the Magadhan Empire were vassals ruled by their own dynasties. The House of Aulikara ruled the Kingdom of Malwa as vassals of Kumaragupta of the Magadhan Empire for some time, so perhaps, the Rai dynasty might have ruled Sindh as vassals of the Magadhan Empire under Guptas for a period the same way but then could have come under Persian influence later on or earlier. Ancient history is usually pretty ambiguous in these cases. PadFoot2008 (talk) 01:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Use British English tag[edit]

Hi PadFoot2008, just wondering why you added the Use British English tag to Breakup of Spanish armed forces (1936) and changed the spelling within the article? This violates MOS:RETAIN which states "With few exceptions (e.g., when a topic has strong national ties or the change reduces ambiguity), there is no valid reason for changing from one acceptable option to another." AusLondonder (talk) 17:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @AusLondonder, my bad, I wasn't aware of MOS:RETAIN. I was looking at WP:EngvarB. Thanks for informing me about it. PadFoot2008 13:47, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, no worries. AusLondonder (talk) 17:25, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of battles involving the Maratha Confederacy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pratapgarh and Battle of Delhi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead sentence[edit]

There is a consensus at INB (including admins), according to which location of various Indian states are arranged/written in the lead sentence. It is largely based on Britannica's definition. Let them stay that way. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk, Okay, sorry I didn't know. PadFoot2008 13:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Deccanis
added a link pointing to Hindustani
List of Indian monarchs
added a link pointing to Shahu

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Copying in Wikipedia[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from India into North India. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:22, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I am sorry I forgot this time. I shall do that next time onwards. PadFoot2008 04:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maratha Confederacy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shahu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding removal of Sourced information as per your POV in Maratha Empire Article[edit]

State the specific reason of removing my sourced content in Maratha Empire article? Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 09:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your content was not sourced. It needs to be explicitly mentioned in a citation. Besides it doesn't need to be in the lead either. PadFoot2008 09:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Marathas - Cambridge History of India (Vol. 2, Part 4) : New Cambridge History of India : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive this is the source for protectors of Delhi throne pg 138 here is the quotation: For the Marathas, probably the two most significant events of the whole chaotic period in Delhi were a treaty in 1752, which made them protector of the Mughal throne (and gave them the right to collect chauth in the Punjab), and the civil war of 1753, by which the Maratha nominee ended up on the Mughal throne.
This is for Areal limit of the Empire/Confederacy (same source); Quoting: First, we shall look at the expanding areas controlled by the Marathas, and there were many. Maratha leaders pushed into Rajasthan, the area around Delhi, and on into the Punjab. They attacked Bundelkund and the borders of Uttar Pradesh. Further east, the Marathas attacked Orissa and the borders of Bengal and Bihar.
Advanced Study in the History of Modern India 1707-1813 - Jaswant Lal Mehta - Google Books pg 233-237
I can provide more sources if you want NOW?? Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 09:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As I said before, it mentions the regions the Confederacy collected chauth from, not that the regions were a part of the Confederacy. And also please stop shouting. PadFoot2008 09:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See my comment on Maratha Empire talk page Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 09:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Did you see my new comments can i add now? Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 09:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion[edit]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Note that I have placed this notice on behalf of the requestor, and that I have no part to play in the dispute 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 14:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To inform you something[edit]

I recently added something on my User Page and I am informing you this since we both have an ongoing dispute about some information in the Maratha Empire article. So plz see my user page link I have already provided and don't consider me inactive or satisfied with any comment of yours and others unless I state so. I need to have a time limit for Wikipedia as I have to concentrate on other things (especially my studies) which are equally important for me if not more. So plz wait for my responses I may not be replying so fast as I did before. I hope you will be okay with it. Regards. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 05:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to gain a popular consensus for your edit in the article talk page itself. You don't have my consensus as of now. PadFoot2008 05:46, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This was not about consensus this was about something else though I understand what you are trying to say. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 05:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]