User talk:IbrahimAlHanafi

January 2023[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Hakeem Noor-ud-Din, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. PepperBeast (talk) 19:42, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:51, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IbrahimAlHanafi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to request for my account to become unblocked and I shall not make any of these kind of edits again. Please give me another chance. I had received a final warning which I had payed heed towards and didn’t vandalise anymore pages yet my account was still blocked. I acknowledge my unnecessary mischievous activity and promise to from now on only make necessary edits as I do feel that I can provide good and useful information. Please give me one last chance. IbrahimAlHanafi (talk) 10:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Reading our guide to improving articles.
Picking any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.

Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}}),
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]),
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]),
  - and do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include any citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking using {{unblock}} and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will hopefully improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 10:38, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I wanted to appeal for an unblock as I had wanted to make some improvements on mistaken points in articles I had but nothing major. I promise that I won’t make any edits that are unnecessary or not an actual improvement. I would really like just one chance. If you notice any activity that violates the guideline you can block me again.

Kind Regards, IbrahimAlHanafi IbrahimAlHanafi (talk) 04:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: improvements on mistaken points in some articles I had read but nothing major. IbrahimAlHanafi (talk) 04:07, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IbrahimAlHanafi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wanted to appeal for an unblock as I had wanted to make some improvements on mistaken points in some articles I had read but nothing major. I promise that I won’t make any edits that are unnecessary or not an actual improvement. I would really like just one chance. If you notice any activity that violates the guidelines you can block me again. IbrahimAlHanafi (talk) 04:09, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. You didn't follow the path you were offered. Yamla (talk) 11:44, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Someone else will review your request, but I offered you a path to demonstrate a substantive edit you would make; are you specifically declining to use that path? 331dot (talk) 09:26, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IbrahimAlHanafi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, it has been a year since I was blocked from Wikipedia. I wanted to request to be unblocked. I acknowledge my misconduct and promise to not do it again. This was a mistake that I had made when I was much younger and I will not abuse the editing facilities again. Please consider my request. Please give me just one more chance.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; you still haven't followed the instructions above. If you are just deliberately wasting our time, there's little reason to leave talk page enabled here. Please think very, very hard before deliberately wasting our time again because you likely only have one more chance to take the unblocking path offered you. Yamla (talk) 17:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IbrahimAlHanafi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Apologies, I am really sorry if it seemed as if I am wasting your time, I assure you that I was not intending to do that. Is there any alternative easier path that I can take at all? To be honest, I find this one really difficult and confusing and don’t get the instructions, plus I have difficulty in writing as I am dyslexic. Once again, I acknowledge my mistake and am really sorry for my misconduct in the past. I can assure that it will never happen again. Kind Regards,

Decline reason:

No -- you've been repeatedly told what you had to do, and refused to do it, whereas all of your contributions have been patently disruptive. Decline per all other declines. jp×g 🗯️ 03:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you have a condition which prevents you from understanding our instructions, that is most unfortunate, but you won't be able to participate here unless you have the ability to understand and observe instructions. It's not just with the instructions you have been given here- understanding information being given to you is a core aspect of this project. If you are unable to follow the instructions here, what makes you think that you are able to contribute to this project? 331dot (talk) 08:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]