User talk:Ecrusized

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Ecrusized, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 13:24, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:27, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DS information on Kurds and Kurdistan[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 14:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Ecrusized. Thank you for your work on Operation Claw-Sword. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:17, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DS information on Armenia-Azerbaijan[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Curbon7 (talk) 18:23, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Ecrusized. Thank you for your work on 22 September 1980 Iraqi airstrike on Iran. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:25, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2023 Sudan clashes[edit]

On 21 April 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 Sudan clashes, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Curbon7 (talk) 17:25, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey.[edit]

I noticed you left a note at Talk:2023_Sudan_conflict#Wagner_or_Russia? about @NYMan6 that may be seen as not assuming good faith. Your name also isn't in the signature.

May you please further explain what you meant by it?

- L'Mainerque - (Disturb my slumber) - 21:06, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Ecrusized I would like to inform to you that both the edits that you listed were of reliable sources I had gathered (I was never affilated to the Russian government nor the Wagner Group, in fact I'm pretty much neutral in the conflict) This is disturbing of you mentioning it especially on my comment regarding changing the name having nothing to do for what you've said, I am a 6 month account on the platform, before not having an account I was a person that just used the platform frequently now I am a article creator and editor.

Thank you, NYMan6 (talk) 01:15, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support[edit]

It seems that you are persistent in reinstating the vague or even irrelevant supported by claims. It's your onus to get consensus for addition of challenged material, since there is no consensus for that on the talk page yet, reliable or not is decided by consensus, not you. There are at least 3 other editors who don't agree with the claims, that's enough to remove the claims for now and wait for consensus if that is to be reinstated. There is literally only one source about support and that's barely enough, the rest is about support before conflict, which is totally irrelevant. RCB88 (talk) 12:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me...[edit]

What software did you use to create File:Wagner Group mutiny.svg? I've been trying for days using Inkscape but I haven't been successful. Nythar (💬-🍀) 11:47, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nythar: It's a derivative of the file c:File:European Russia laea location map (without Crimea).svg. I have filled the selected oblasts where the clashes are going on with Inkscape. Don't forget to unlock the layers if this is what you're struggling with. Ecrusized (talk) 11:51, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for your efforts[edit]

The Current Events Barnstar
In recognition of your contributions to the article Nahel Merzouk protests. --Cdjp1 talk 15:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023 Northern Syria clashes (Question)[edit]

Hello. Just curious. What's your reasoning behind changing "Internal Security Forces" to "Asayish" in October 2023 Northern Syria clashes ? CatmanBw (talk) 18:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gaza War Map[edit]

I'm away from my main computer, so I can't get to this right now, but Palestinian militants have been arrested in Ein HaShlosha and Nahal Oz, so those communities should be added to include the presence of Palestinian militants. -- Veggies (talk) 18:28, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Veggies: Added but I can't find a source for Nahal Oz, do you have a source for this? Ecrusized (talk) 18:48, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, sorry. I meant to include it. [1] -- Veggies (talk) 18:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for keeping up with the map. Could you tell me how you got the OpenTopoMap data onto the map? Thanks. -- Veggies (talk) 05:01, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to be so insistent, but I'd really love to know. I can't get OpenTopoMap to export anything and I don't want to try to do it via patchy screenshots. -- Veggies (talk) 21:17, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Veggies: Hi, sorry I didn't notice the message yesterday. I simply create it by taking multiple screen shots and then merging those images together in GIMP. I have already made one for Israel-Lebanon-Syria border in case war spreads to the north. Here is the .png for it. Ecrusized (talk) 21:23, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, yeah, I was afraid that was the only way. Oh well. And, yes, I was looking to make one for the same sector. Looks like you beat me to it. 👍 -- Veggies (talk) 22:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I created an SVG map for the Lebanese/Northern Israel theater. File:Israel-Lebanon-Syria-border-Conflict-2023.svg Let me know your thoughts. I'll include it in the appropriate section in the war article. -- Veggies (talk) 15:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Veggies: Looks good, I was also in the midst filling the same region. You should upload this one on Wikipedia, I'll performs updates when needed. Besides that, one problem I found is that due to the large size of the original .png, the compression results in considerable artifacting. This becomes especially noticeable when zoomed in. I've used GIMP to compress it with minimal quality loss. Another alternative would be to upload the file as .png without any loss but this would prevent users from translating the file. I personally favor having a .svg instead of a .png. Let me know what you think. Ecrusized (talk) 16:34, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here it is thus far, I've kept the 24bit ratio on the jpeg instead of using 8bit, but brought the quality down to 84, smoothness to 25 and set subsampling to 4:2:0. Ecrusized (talk) 16:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Where'd you get the spellings and locations of the towns on the map? They're different from the ones I used and the ones Wikipedia uses. -- Veggies (talk) 23:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Veggies: I got them from Google Maps. Ecrusized (talk) 07:54, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
​I'm a little hesitant about that. Google Maps isn't universally considered a reliable source. Beyond that, I think copying place names so directly may be a copyvio issue. Also, I always used (and use) the spellings for places as they're used in Wikipedia (ex: Kiryat Shmona vs Qiryat Shemona). -- Veggies (talk) 13:31, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Veggies: I’ll work to restore Wikipedia names in the next edit. Ecrusized (talk) 15:15, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've updated the names with Wikipedia names. Also there is something I should mention, when editing the file, saving as Inkscape .svg will increase its size to over 10mb, for this reason you should save it as optimized svg, if using Inkscape. Ecrusized (talk) 21:28, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
​Thanks for all your help. I tried to add the name of a moshav in the original Gaza-area map per a request on Commons talk, but I think I screwed something up. I'm still learning how to work with Inkscape. Someone wanted the name of Yakhini added, which is fine, but when I uploaded the SVG file, it created a mess in the thumbnail, so I quickly reverted. Could you tell me what I did wrong? Thanks again. -- Veggies (talk) 06:44, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Veggies: Translated .svg are a bit problematic when editing with Inkscape. I'm not sure what went wrong with your edit but generally, trying to copy paste location names will cause them to disappear due to being "switches" instead of regular text. Ecrusized (talk) 08:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
​What's the solution? Should I just write the name out in Inkscape and save as optimized SVG? How did you fix it? -- Veggies (talk) 15:06, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Veggies: I created a new text (T key) in the same font and size as the rest. Also saved as plain svg. Ecrusized (talk) 15:59, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

​I understand that User:Supreme Deliciousness says Gjajar hasn't been evacuated, but it should still be included in the evacuation zone. Israel has designated the town as one to be evacuated even if they're not forcibly evacuating people. After all, many people who live in the evacuation zone also refuse to leave. -- Veggies (talk) 04:58, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from what user Supreme Deliciousness has stated, there is another plus in not having Gajar included in the evacuation zone. It allows the Israeli-controlled Golan Heights to be viewed in full, otherwise it gets divided with the separation color. Ecrusized (talk) 08:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Israel war[edit]

Could you please somehow differentiate the Israeli figures of losses from the confirmed Palestinian ones, for example draw a line and put it under the 3 points? Onesgje9g334 (talk) 11:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:October 2023 Gaza−Israel conflict.svg[edit]

Hi. An admin (user Sadads) has rightfully pointed to the fact that File:October 2023 Gaza−Israel conflict.svg is a problem for colorblind people. Could you change the red on the map into light green? Tradediatalk 06:25, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is light green better to distinguish compared to red for colorblind people? Here is what it would look like but it is more difficult to distinguish for people with normal vision. User Sadads main concern appears to be good vs evil coloring? Ecrusized (talk) 09:48, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Tradedia: According to this chart, red and blue are distinguishable for different types of colorblindness. Ecrusized (talk) 09:57, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User Sadads wrote: "... could we use a color combination that is less cultural associated with "good vs bad" AND also less inaccessible for Red/Blue colorblind folks." So I think he had both concerns. I personally am not worried about the cultural issue. He also mentioned "... Red/Blue colorblind folks", and proposed: "... green and blue of different hues". Tradediatalk 14:06, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2024 conflict in Ecuador[edit]

On 10 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 conflict in Ecuador, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ed [talk] [OMT] 16:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Yemeni Barnstar for you[edit]

The Yemen Barnstar of National Merit
For your maps and edits in the Yemen-related war articles, keep up the amazing work! Abo Yemen✉ 19:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Israel-Hamas Casualties[edit]

I've been trying to keep the casualty count updated and accurate, and luckily not been doing it alone. Thank you for your efforts, you've been instrumental. I remember at the start of the war, I was the only one keeping it updated, but I'm in a bad time zone for this (Local sources updated in the middle of my night). Based on when you edit, you're probably in a closer time zone to the conflict than I, so thanks for updating as soon as new sources come out. TheAwesomeAtom (talk) 18:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :). Ecrusized (talk) 18:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Would either of you have an opinion on this? galenIgh 13:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TheAwesomeAtom: I have been topic banned from Arab Israeli dispute articles for 6 months thus will not be able to update the tally any longer. If you would like to take over, I Google "Gaza death toll Barron's", and quickly replace the url and title. Barron's publishes daily articles of the death toll. Ecrusized (talk) 17:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I'm on it. Thanks for the informing me! TheAwesomeAtom (talk) 19:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If I may ask, why'd you get topic-banned? TheAwesomeAtom (talk) 18:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the notice from my talk page but you can see it in the old versions of the page. Ecrusized (talk) 22:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Israel-Hamas War Map[edit]

Hi, I can't comment under the discussion over the map from the Israel-Hamas War article since it's protected, but I wanted to say that ISW does indeed mean "total area the IDF have operated in", not "currently ongoing IDF clearing operations". The phrasing "reported IDF clearing operations" they use is very misleading and it's completely bizarre why they would show total extent rather than current control, so I understand why anyone looking at it would think it's a control map, especially since they also have an additional category called "claimed furthest Israeli advance" which in fact is mostly meaningless and shouldn't be there at all. The satellite imagery they use as source for their map is open source and you can see easily where the IDF still actively operate and where they don't anymore, this should definetly be a clear distinction made on the map or should at least be added to the description (for example: "Furthest IDF advances in Gaza (does not account for areas withdrawn from)") or it will be completely misleading just like the ISW map. I'd also recommend adding the military outposts/bases the IDF has built inside Gaza, which you can also see on the satellite imagery, and the Route 749 gravel road. Gaza War Unit Tracking (talk) 18:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gaza War Unit Tracking: There is an ongoing discussion about it over here. Ecrusized (talk) 10:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I know, I can't comment there, the page is protected Gaza War Unit Tracking (talk) 11:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh right. Sorry. Well. Like I said over there though. I believe its best to keep the map as it is for the time being as ISW hasn't made a distinction between where IDF currently and formerly operates. Trying to make a separation would create synthesis issues. However, if you can find a single source that shows where IDF is currently operating, I could update the map with that. Ecrusized (talk) 12:16, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/1/edit?mid=1CJ84G4mYnPgQ-pBVJl0EqQl2fWog82s&usp=sharing
Alternatively if we are to keep the ISW map we should change the description under the map to "Furthest extent of all Israeli operations (does not show current IDF control)" or something along those lines, because "Claimed extent of Israeli invasion of Gaza" doesn't make it clear that Israel currently only controls 6.3% of the area shown. Gaza War Unit Tracking (talk) 16:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ecrusized&oldid=1225516512"