User talk:BAABNRRBBORB1

Welcome![edit]

Hello, BAABNRRBBORB1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. JarrahTree 11:22, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creator is a sockpuppet.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jarrahdale Jarrah Forests and Railways Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jarrahdale Jarrah Forests and Railways Limited, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 16:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Previous Unblock Request (Archived?)[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BAABNRRBBORB1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for sockpuppetry, as I was abusing multiple accounts (the other account being Norman_Roswin_Rolf_Birkner) I understand that this was picked up because when this account/I created the atom bond article it was selected for deletion for lack of sources so I used my other account to try and save it by posting my vote as to keep as well as this account also voting for a keep which is abusing multiple accounts. I also never stated whether or not this was an alt which you have to under the policy but I didn't both accounts we're also used to edit each others drafts. I fully understand what I've done wrong and would love to come back and be a constructive user. My actions were wrong and I apologise for causing such disruption and take full responsibility for them. Here is the text from the other two post-six-month appeals for quick reference. Thank you for reading. (Sorry for poor writing style and spelling) "As stated before I know why I was blocked and how not to do it again and would like to return to the en Wikipedia to contribute in a constructive manner. Thank you for reading. Below was my original reason from the 2nd of August (2021). "I was blocked for sockpuppetry as I was abusing two accounts this was/is wrong and I fully understand what I've done wrong and how to avoid it in future. I have waited six months but continued to work on other WikiProjects (as per the Standard Offer) such as contributing to a deletion request on one of my images one my drafts was also published. In short, I understand why I've been blocked, how to avoid this in the future and would like to return to the English Wikipedia to contribute valuable information. Thank you for reading." (talk) 12:21, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Factoring out edits to your Commons userpage, you only have a single significant edit to Commons - a single other project, afaict. You haven't done any negative in the last six months, which is a significant positive, but you also haven't given us any reason to trust that should an issue arise, you wouldn't utilise similar means or can edit productively. I understand that if you're not especially confident on images (a category I share) that Commons may not be ideal. Have you considered simple english wikipedia? While of course you're welcome to appeal again immediately, you seem to be following a self-specified six-monthly schedule (that's fine btw - indeed, is often recommended) so I will note that given the improvements I would say you can appeal again in 3 months. I'd aim for a couple of hundred *productive* edits. Nosebagbear (talk) 23:36, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi there, a few questions/notes:

Were those two other six month appeals both through UTRS? Or were they on a talk page?
What other projects have you been working on - can you give a couple of good examples of productive work on them?
In the meantime, I will find a CU to do a check Nosebagbear (talk) 14:33, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CU here. No evidence of socking or evasion that I can see. I can confirm this account to Norman Roswin Rolf Birkner as everyone already knew. --Yamla (talk) 15:48, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nosebagbear Yes, both six-month appeals were on UTRS the first one was declined as I was instructed to do the appeal using my original account (this one). The Second Appeal was declined as they instructed me to leave an appeal on my talk page which had been blocked until now. Other projects include wiki commons where I responded to a deletion nomination to one of my images to which I agreed. One of my drafts (WAGR AI Class Passenger Carriages) was also published (if that counts). I must admit I was a bit skittish to edit on other projects. Thanks (talk) 7:08, 10 August 2021 (UTC+8)

@Nosebagbear: Sorry for the inactivity but I have one more question before I begin editing on other Wiki projects. Which account do I use? As I want to use the NRRB one and not this one. Thanks. BAABNRRBBORB1 (talk) 12:28, 28 December 2021 (UTC)/6:09, 8 March 2022 (UTC+8)[reply]

New Unblock Request[edit]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

BAABNRRBBORB1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have caused no trouble since I was blocked, and have made over 2,000 edits on Wikidata, and over 180 edits on Simplified Wikipedia under the account S547 Lindsay. I promise not to cause any trouble if I'm unblocked, I acknowledge my disgraceful behaviour. Thank you (talk) 10:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC+8), edited 10:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC+8). Here is my previous response:

"I was blocked for sockpuppetry, as I was abusing multiple accounts (the other account being Norman_Roswin_Rolf_Birkner) I understand that this was picked up because when this account/I created the atom bond article it was selected for deletion for lack of sources so I used my other account to try and save it by posting my vote as to keep as well as this account also voting for a keep which is abusing multiple accounts. I also never stated whether or not this was an alt which you have to under the policy but I didn't both accounts we're also used to edit each others drafts. I fully understand what I've done wrong and would love to come back and be a constructive user. My actions were wrong and I apologise for causing such disruption and take full responsibility for them. Here is the text from the other two post-six-month appeals for quick reference. Thank you for reading. (Sorry for poor writing style and spelling) "As stated before I know why I was blocked and how not to do it again and would like to return to the en Wikipedia to contribute in a constructive manner. Thank you for reading. Below was my original reason from the 2nd of August (2021). "I was blocked for sockpuppetry as I was abusing two accounts this was/is wrong and I fully understand what I've done wrong and how to avoid it in future. I have waited six months but continued to work on other WikiProjects (as per the Standard Offer) such as contributing to a deletion request on one of my images one my drafts was also published. In short, I understand why I've been blocked, how to avoid this in the future and would like to return to the English Wikipedia to contribute valuable information. Thank you for reading." (talk) 12:21, 6 August 2021 (UTC)"

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have caused no trouble since I was blocked, and have made [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/S547_Lindsay over 2,000 edits on Wikidata], and [https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/S547_Lindsay over 180 edits on Simplified Wikipedia] under the account S547 Lindsay. I promise not to cause any trouble if I'm unblocked, I acknowledge my disgraceful behaviour. Thank you ([[User talk:BAABNRRBBORB1#top|talk]]) 10:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC+8), edited 10:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC+8). Here is my previous response:<br><br>'''"I was blocked for sockpuppetry, as I was abusing multiple accounts (the other account being Norman_Roswin_Rolf_Birkner) I understand that this was picked up because when this account/I created the atom bond article it was selected for deletion for lack of sources so I used my other account to try and save it by posting my vote as to keep as well as this account also voting for a keep which is abusing multiple accounts. I also never stated whether or not this was an alt which you have to under the policy but I didn't both accounts we're also used to edit each others drafts. I fully understand what I've done wrong and would love to come back and be a constructive user. My actions were wrong and I apologise for causing such disruption and take full responsibility for them. Here is the text from the other two post-six-month appeals for quick reference. ''Thank you for reading.'' (Sorry for poor writing style and spelling) ''"As stated before I know why I was blocked and how not to do it again and would like to return to the en Wikipedia to contribute in a constructive manner. Thank you for reading. Below was my original reason from the 2nd of August (2021). "I was blocked for sockpuppetry as I was abusing two accounts this was/is wrong and I fully understand what I've done wrong and how to avoid it in future. I have waited six months but continued to work on other WikiProjects (as per the Standard Offer) such as contributing to a deletion request on one of my images one my drafts was also published. In short, I understand why I've been blocked, how to avoid this in the future and would like to return to the English Wikipedia to contribute valuable information. Thank you for reading."'' ([[User talk:BAABNRRBBORB1#top|talk]]) 12:21, 6 August 2021 (UTC)"''' |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have caused no trouble since I was blocked, and have made [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/S547_Lindsay over 2,000 edits on Wikidata], and [https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/S547_Lindsay over 180 edits on Simplified Wikipedia] under the account S547 Lindsay. I promise not to cause any trouble if I'm unblocked, I acknowledge my disgraceful behaviour. Thank you ([[User talk:BAABNRRBBORB1#top|talk]]) 10:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC+8), edited 10:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC+8). Here is my previous response:<br><br>'''"I was blocked for sockpuppetry, as I was abusing multiple accounts (the other account being Norman_Roswin_Rolf_Birkner) I understand that this was picked up because when this account/I created the atom bond article it was selected for deletion for lack of sources so I used my other account to try and save it by posting my vote as to keep as well as this account also voting for a keep which is abusing multiple accounts. I also never stated whether or not this was an alt which you have to under the policy but I didn't both accounts we're also used to edit each others drafts. I fully understand what I've done wrong and would love to come back and be a constructive user. My actions were wrong and I apologise for causing such disruption and take full responsibility for them. Here is the text from the other two post-six-month appeals for quick reference. ''Thank you for reading.'' (Sorry for poor writing style and spelling) ''"As stated before I know why I was blocked and how not to do it again and would like to return to the en Wikipedia to contribute in a constructive manner. Thank you for reading. Below was my original reason from the 2nd of August (2021). "I was blocked for sockpuppetry as I was abusing two accounts this was/is wrong and I fully understand what I've done wrong and how to avoid it in future. I have waited six months but continued to work on other WikiProjects (as per the Standard Offer) such as contributing to a deletion request on one of my images one my drafts was also published. In short, I understand why I've been blocked, how to avoid this in the future and would like to return to the English Wikipedia to contribute valuable information. Thank you for reading."'' ([[User talk:BAABNRRBBORB1#top|talk]]) 12:21, 6 August 2021 (UTC)"''' |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have caused no trouble since I was blocked, and have made [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/S547_Lindsay over 2,000 edits on Wikidata], and [https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/S547_Lindsay over 180 edits on Simplified Wikipedia] under the account S547 Lindsay. I promise not to cause any trouble if I'm unblocked, I acknowledge my disgraceful behaviour. Thank you ([[User talk:BAABNRRBBORB1#top|talk]]) 10:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC+8), edited 10:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC+8). Here is my previous response:<br><br>'''"I was blocked for sockpuppetry, as I was abusing multiple accounts (the other account being Norman_Roswin_Rolf_Birkner) I understand that this was picked up because when this account/I created the atom bond article it was selected for deletion for lack of sources so I used my other account to try and save it by posting my vote as to keep as well as this account also voting for a keep which is abusing multiple accounts. I also never stated whether or not this was an alt which you have to under the policy but I didn't both accounts we're also used to edit each others drafts. I fully understand what I've done wrong and would love to come back and be a constructive user. My actions were wrong and I apologise for causing such disruption and take full responsibility for them. Here is the text from the other two post-six-month appeals for quick reference. ''Thank you for reading.'' (Sorry for poor writing style and spelling) ''"As stated before I know why I was blocked and how not to do it again and would like to return to the en Wikipedia to contribute in a constructive manner. Thank you for reading. Below was my original reason from the 2nd of August (2021). "I was blocked for sockpuppetry as I was abusing two accounts this was/is wrong and I fully understand what I've done wrong and how to avoid it in future. I have waited six months but continued to work on other WikiProjects (as per the Standard Offer) such as contributing to a deletion request on one of my images one my drafts was also published. In short, I understand why I've been blocked, how to avoid this in the future and would like to return to the English Wikipedia to contribute valuable information. Thank you for reading."'' ([[User talk:BAABNRRBBORB1#top|talk]]) 12:21, 6 August 2021 (UTC)"''' |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

CU data shows no evidence of block evasion, with the exception of S547 Lindsay which is not abusive (not used to edit on en.wikipedia). --Yamla (talk) 16:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]