User contributions for NgHanoi

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

11:2711:27, 21 May 2024 diff hist +4‎ User talk:Grayfell ‎ Edit the paragraphing
11:2611:26, 21 May 2024 diff hist +1,753‎ User talk:Grayfell ‎ Complains about Mr. Grayfell's uncivil actions.
04:3704:37, 21 May 2024 diff hist +774‎ Myers–Briggs Type Indicator ‎ Undid revision 1224899281 by Grayfell (talk) Mr. Grayfell just perform undoing without actual reading the article (The first reference in the wiki page anyway). Please read the actual source before making accusation. This is not cherry picking but it is from the abstract and conclusion of the article. Tag: Reverted
02:1402:14, 21 May 2024 diff hist +774‎ Myers–Briggs Type Indicator ‎ Source [1] actually supported the validity of MBTI Tag: Reverted

06:4506:45, 17 May 2024 diff hist +360‎ Talk:Myers–Briggs Type Indicator ‎No edit summary
05:5905:59, 17 May 2024 diff hist +553‎ Myers–Briggs Type Indicator ‎ Include sources with positive meta-analysis of MBTI's reliability

19:5219:52, 26 April 2024 diff hist +49‎ Talk:Myers–Briggs Type Indicator ‎ Correct a mistake: Some --> Most
19:3819:38, 26 April 2024 diff hist +481‎ User talk:NgHanoi ‎ →‎April 2024: Reply current Tag: Reply
19:3519:35, 26 April 2024 diff hist +677‎ Talk:Myers–Briggs Type Indicator ‎ →‎Description of MBTI attributes in Lead: Reply Tag: Reply
18:5718:57, 26 April 2024 diff hist +205‎ User talk:NgHanoi ‎ →‎April 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
18:5518:55, 26 April 2024 diff hist 0‎ Myers–Briggs Type Indicator ‎ Reverse incorrect sourcing. Undid revision 1220920937 by MrOllie (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
18:5318:53, 26 April 2024 diff hist 0‎ Myers–Briggs Type Indicator ‎ Undid revision 1220919417 by MrOllie (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
18:3818:38, 26 April 2024 diff hist 0‎ Myers–Briggs Type Indicator ‎ In correct citation, the source did NOT claim that "Most of the research supporting the MBTI's validity has been produced by the Center for Applications of Psychological Type". Please read the source carefully instead of making over-reaching statement. Tag: Reverted

00:4000:40, 25 April 2024 diff hist 0‎ m Myers–Briggs Type Indicator ‎ There are many publications supporting MBTI from general academic institutes, not just Center for Applications of Psychological Type. Using the word "Most of the research supporting ..." implies manipulations, while in fact MBTI has broader acceptances. Tags: Reverted Visual edit