Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Products

Note: In some cases there is another, more specific category than this one. If possible, please use one of these instead:

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Albums and songs (e.g. CDs and singles)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Anime and manga (e.g. comic books, DVDs)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Comics and animation (same as above)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies
Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Games (e.g. board games)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature (e.g. books)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software
Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Transportation (e.g. cars)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Video games

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Products. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Products|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

Note that there are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove links to other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Products.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Products/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Products[edit]

India's Most Attractive Brands[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does in fact seem to be made for pay, and the sources just do not line up here either. I only found this page after looking to add an image book cover in the infobox, but then I looked into it further and discovered that the page itself really qualifies for a deletion AfD. Iljhgtn (talk) 22:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards and Products. AllyD (talk) 08:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article on a non-notable research company's survey, published between 2013 and 2018. These picked up the expected passing mentions of the named top brands but I am not seeing evidence that the published survey was in itself notable. AllyD (talk) 09:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The article appears to simply promote a paid survey by a market research company. Further, no significant third-party media organizations are referencing the study, indicating that it has minimal to no value in and of itself. Volcom95 (talk) 07:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom lacks sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. Page is WP:SYNTH and is made for WP:PROMO. Research is not notable and not backed by any secondary independent sources. RangersRus (talk) 12:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ecto (software)[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, little coverage outside of user-generated sources. Was kept at last AfD but barely improved since. TappyTurtle [talk | contribs] 17:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products, Computing, Internet, and Software. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 18:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete: I found a source that gives a brief tutorial on how to use it, but this alone doesn't meet the bar for significant coverage. I can be persuaded to turn this into a Keep vote if someone comes forth with a second source that would establish notability. HyperAccelerated (talk) 21:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Samsung U740 Alias[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is this notable enough for a standalone article? Possible ATD is merge/redirect to Samsung, but I am not sure if this would be helpful, especially as this article is totally unreferenced. Boleyn (talk) 16:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Technology. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 19:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge I've added some refs but I'd go for a selective merge with Samsung U750 Alias 2. Both are late 2000's phone, but they were popular at the time of their release, and we have mainstream coverage of both. — hako9 (talk) 19:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sagem myX-2[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It doesn't appear to meet WP:N, made by non-notable company. Boleyn (talk) 09:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 14:18, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - depending on the outcome of this discussion, we may also want to nominate Sagem myX-7 for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~:Delete per WP:NCORP 104.7.152.180 (talk) 14:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

This is a product, not a company. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Struck -- sock. jp×g 🗯️ 01:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Products Proposed deletions[edit]