Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Sosa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 10:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ralph Sosa[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable Alan - talk 21:20, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CTJF83 chat 19:59, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment. The article is a BLP so a second relist is reasonable. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete Non-notable, with a downcheck for misleading assertion. The article claims "He was nominated for a Primetime Emmy Award in 2005 for Outstanding Animated Program (Less Than One Hour)." But actually, he was not nominated personally. The nomination was for an episode of The Simpsons. The episode itself was nominated for "Outstanding Animated Program (For Programming Less Than One Hour)". He was somewhere way down the list as an assistant director.Emmy Awards, 2005 --MelanieN (talk) 00:16, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I could not find significant coverage of the subject. MelanieN has adequately refuted the sole claim to real notability contained in the article. Ray^Talk 19:55, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.