Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ines Crnokrak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 11:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ines Crnokrak[edit]

A little iffy - has a few arguably worthwhile credits, but nothing that makes her notable among hundreds of others with the same resume, and there are no sources to show for it. Previous prod removed with addition of LiveJournal as an EL. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 04:23, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I found this 1232 I know that each article should have its own merit, but I have to mention that looking at others articles in the same category they all have more or less the same. If this article is to be deleted then all the other should also. --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 05:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Forums and photo galleries? Only MyNewsNetwork amounts to much as a source, but to me it's not significant coverage (although it's a start), as it seems like Crnokrak was interviewed simply because a model needed to be interviewed, as opposed to being chosen for being notable, but maybe that's just me. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 13:19, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I really understand your point and it should be a rule applied to all the articles in Wikipedia, but is not the case. Only a few articles that some editors take interest to read or to come across are the ones to be nomitated for deletion. Please take a look at the following articles in the Category:Fashion biography stubs. Those don't have also repubable sources or references: Adrienne Vittadini, Walé Adeyemi, Carlota Alfaro, Shami Ahmed, Alberto Makali, Christopher Cortez, Sophie Albou, Pegah Anvarian. As I said before, I know that each article should be discuss and nominated for deletion on its own. --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 17:59, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- So I went and looked at those articles to nominate them for deletion. Guess what I found? Cortez won a TV show, Makali has tons of coverage on Google News ([1]), Vittadini is incredibly famous, Alfaro has an institute named for her, Adeyemi won the Fashion and Design Award...need I go on? If those articles are in a bad shape, fix them up. What matters (unfortunately) at AfD is not the state of the article but the notability of the topic. Besides, this charge of selective nominating is without merit. Drmies (talk) 03:45, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 05:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 05:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:42, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - she is verifiably working as a model, but there is no coverage about her aside from the one from NY News network which is rather insubstantial. Some quotes in [2], and [3] but taken altogether, it does not add up to enough to meet notability. The sad state of other articles on models has no relevance to this AFD.-- Whpq (talk) 21:40, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pastor Theo (talk) 02:02, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Whpq, who correctly spots the lack of in-depth coverage (coverage beyond a quick mention or a quote). Drmies (talk) 03:36, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.