Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haplotype 35

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Star Mississippi 12:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Haplotype 35[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2011, notability unclear. jengod (talk) 06:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. jengod (talk) 06:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added a reference. Most articles about individual haplotypes deal with a name that begins with a letter rather than a digit, so this might not be the current terminology. I wonder whether this should be merged into Haplogroup R1b. Haplogroup 21 is a redirect to Haplogroup E-M215, for example. I will post a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Molecular Biology/Genetics asking for expert help. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. This numbering system isn't used anymore, and it's hard to work out what the exact modern equivalents are because there have been several rounds of renumbering as our grasp of human genetics has improved. There's certainly no reliable source that provides a convenient lookup chart! In any case, determining whether Ht35 is equivalent to R1b-Z2103 or just to R1b-L23* is way past my pay grade, but that's fine, because we don't dice the haplogroups up that finely for articles. The appropriate merge/redirect target is Haplogroup R-M269. I'd like to advocate for a merge instead of a redirect, but that target article is a mess and I have no idea how you'd merge cleanly. Lubal (talk) 00:49, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.