User talk:Snowsoftime

Welcome![edit]

Hi Snowsoftime! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 23:16, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Constans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constantine II. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources information[edit]

Hi, I have noticed that you seem to have a habit of removing large amounts of sourced content from articles because you personally deem it unimportant, I would advice against this, what you personally find to be "irrelevant" or "unnecessary" might be important for readers to understand contexts or be of major interests to many other editors/readers. At the very least please discuss it on the talk page before removing large chunks of articles. ★Trekker (talk) 23:48, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me, I will keep that in mind. Snowsoftime (talk) 00:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you’re talking about the edits by Tintero21 regarding the names Claudius and Julius in the names of Constantine II and Constantius II. I gave my explanations as to why I removed the content, it wasn’t solely because I found them unnecessary. Snowsoftime (talk) 00:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There have been many cases of removals, not just those ones, in those specific cases I found your motivation for removal to be lacking as well. Like I said, if the information is sourced it's probably best to discuss the matter on the article talk page or on the Classical Greece and Rome project before removing. The only time it's 100% fine to remove sourced information is if the reference is from a non-academic and unreliable source.★Trekker (talk) 02:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]