User talk:Luthfibadr28

Drangong, Taktakan moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Drangong, Taktakan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:34, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Luthfibadr28 (talk) 08:24, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Drangong, Taktakan has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Drangong, Taktakan. Thanks! Bkissin (talk) 16:15, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Drangong, Taktakan has been accepted[edit]

Drangong, Taktakan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 18:36, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Luthfibadr28 (talk) 04:50, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Irasutoya (July 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nightenbelle were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Reads like an advertisement- remove weasel words and puffery. Sources are all publicity and do not establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Irasutoya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Irasutoya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 17:26, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luthfibadr28! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nightenbelle (talk) 17:26, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

The subject is very popular in its home country and among a group of people, but not globally. There's a Wikipedia page in its native language already.

I guess I'll wait until it gets more popularity to get more references (in English). Luthfibadr28 (talk) 03:28, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Irasutoya (November 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No relevant improvement. Also, Lately Japanese is a blog so not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Irasutoya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Irasutoya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:53, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's a page of it now. I guess translating the non-English Wikipedia page is better than submitting a draft. Luthfibadr28 (talk) 06:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1st comment: Reads like an advertisement- remove weasel words and puffery. Sources are all publicity and do not establish notability.
2nd comment: No relevant improvement. Also, Lately Japanese is a blog so not a reliable source.

There is a relevant improvement. Sentences that might "read like an advertisement" are edited. The second reference is a reliable source (from Shūkan Bunshun) which shows significant coverage, but it's in Japanese. I may edit the draft again later when I find a proper source in English. Luthfibadr28 (talk) 08:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Irasutoya[edit]

Hello, Luthfibadr28. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Irasutoya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Irasutoya[edit]

Hello, Luthfibadr28. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Irasutoya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]