User:Nickps/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

a= v[edit]

This is a test section.

CFD[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 01:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Nominator's rationale: Defunct WikiProject. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Nominator's rationale: The current category names are ambiguous as to whether they're, for example, posters of Swedish films or film posters from Sweden. I'd recommend renaming to "Film posters of Sweden" like the Commons categories. hinnk (talk) 21:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Question I hate to be pedantic, but do you mean:
  • Film posters made in Sweden?
  • Film posters hung in Sweden?
  • Posters of films made in Sweden?
  • Posters of films made by Swedish crew members or crew members from Sweden?
  • Film posters that show "Sweden" (e.g. its landscapes or symbols associated with Sweden)?
  • Film posters made or owned by the government of Sweden?
  • Poster of films made by the government of Sweden?
  • Etc.
All of these are more or less reasonable interpretations of Film posters of Sweden. I'm glad you're trying to clarify the catnames, but I don't see it getting much clearer. NLeeuw (talk) 22:11, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Both en:Category:Film posters by language and commons:Category:Film posters by country already better manage this ambiguity, so it does seem like it can be clearer than it is. Even a decision not to rename but develop a consensus on what the subcategories mean and add that to Category:Film posters by language would make it clearer. I don't think being pedantic is helpful here. hinnk (talk) 22:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Comment, regardless of renaming I do not think this is very ambiguous. Posters of Swedish films (i.e. in other countries than Sweden) would be a rather odd reading. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
    Leaning oppose; I don't think its very ambiguous. Omnis Scientia (talk) 18:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Support matching commonscat.
    William Allen Simpson (talk) 06:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)


FFD[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Resolved, offending revision has been replaced -Fastily 01:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Sabrina Spellman (Melissa Joan Hart).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NeoBatfreak (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Part of this image appears in Getty Images. Violates WP:GETTY... and WP:NFCC#2. George Ho (talk) 08:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete as press photo and no free equivalent (the person depicted is still living) Kys5g talk! 09:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
    It's a promotional photo, but whatevs. George Ho (talk) 17:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
    Image has been replaced with the promotion still of the final season.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 19:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
    Sorry, but the newer photo also appears in Getty Images. George Ho (talk) 20:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
    Trying to find other photo you uploaded recently in supplier websites, but hard to find in them. Photo might still have potential commercial interests, but that's not the main issue (yet). I can see just Melissa Joan Hart in her ordinary clothes, and I don't know whether that illustrates her character much. George Ho (talk) 23:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
    That was fro. The Facebook page promoting final season NeoBatfreak (talk) 00:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
    That picture OK? NeoBatfreak (talk) 04:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
    Honestly, I favor the magic-finger screenshot I uploaded more. Neither of the cat-less (or Salem-less) revisions you uploaded did much for me. George Ho (talk) 10:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
    That pic is OK? NeoBatfreak (talk) 04:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
    Any picture that is non-free that depicts a living person is absolutely not OK, man. Delete it. Melissa Joan Hart is still living. Don't forget there are many pictures of her on Commons, especially this Commons category. Kys5g talk! 14:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
    An image of a depicted character, live-action or not, is totally fine. An image of an actor or actress depicting a fictional character is treated as acceptable only for substantial text about the character, like an article. George Ho (talk) 16:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
that was from the show's Facebook page
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


TFD[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Looks like a template that never really took off in usage when it was made in 2010. At this point, such reviews are handled by WP:FFD, and the {{Oldffdfull}} template points readers in the direction of relevant discussions for files. (Also, if this template is deleted, Category:PD reviewed files should probably be deleted per {{Db-g8}} as dependent on the nominated template.) Steel1943 (talk) 22:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

  • Comment NFCC/NFUR and PD discussions were merged into FFD, so this should be a remainder of a defunct process -- 65.92.244.237 (talk) 03:49, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
    It wasn't used for either process though. It was a template that was created then never utilized. Steel1943 (talk) 21:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 09:39, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete as unused. If it was in use, there would be an argument for keeping it for historical purposes. However, it is not. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 03:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


RFD[edit]

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: withdrawn due to conversion to its own viable article.


DRV[edit]

This is a test section.