Talk:Gracie Mansion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

National Park?[edit]

I don't live in NYC, but I understand that this mansion gives tours? Can someone speak to the logistical data as well as the experience of touring the mansion? 68.42.17.202 (talk) 04:06, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Italicization of the name?[edit]

Is there a reason why Gracie Mansion is (inconsistently) in italics throughout the article? --MicahBrwn (talk) 00:57, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Pest[edit]

User:Vegaswikian added a disambiguation needed tag to the In popular culture entry for The Pest. Just wanted to mention that this was added to the article in 2009 by an IP address user and never referenced AFAIK. I'm going to try and find some more info on it as I consider it suspect. -- Limulus (talk) 15:58, 3 February 2012 (UTC) I'm having trouble finding info on the older movies and I can't find anything that claims the 1997 one had a scene there other than pages that took info from this article, so I'm going to take it out of the article; if anyone can find a ref that supports it, please put it back in. Thanks! -- Limulus (talk) 04:34, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Official city business only?[edit]

User:Jayron32 tagged the following text as needing a citation:

"The house may only be used for official city business. Only visiting public officials and the mayor's family may reside with the mayor at the mansion, even for a single overnight stay. As a result, Mayor Rudy Giuliani was unable to have his then-girlfriend live with him (because they were not married), because it would have violated using a taxpayer-funded home for a private citizen. Giuliani was forced to relocate."

A simple google search ('giuliani gracie mansion girlfriend') found several articles which basically state that the actual issue was regarding Giuliani's marriage:

ABC News (May 21, 2001) "State Supreme Court Justice Judith Gische granted Hanover's request for a restraining order barring Judith Nathan from Gracie Mansion, the mayor's official residence, and its surrounding grounds. Hanover, 51, and Giuliani, 56, continue to live at Gracie with their children, Andrew, 15, and Caroline, 11. Hanover sleeps in the master bedroom while Giuliani sleeps in a guest room. Gische further restrained Giuliani from permitting Nathan, 46, from being "present at any event attended by the children of the marriage or otherwise being in the presence of the parties' children." The case has addressed which sections of the 200-year-old, four-story house are considered to be public or private."

So that part should probably be rewritten, yes. -- Limulus (talk) 18:40, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gracie Mansion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:54, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst talk 18:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gracie Mansion
Gracie Mansion

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 15:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Gracie Mansion; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • I prefer to review older nominations but find it impossible to ignore the hook with the public toilet. It is short, clear, and very attention-grabbing. The dirty bit is not in the preview we got here but it is in the cited article; you just have to bypass the paywallpay to read it. I applaud you, Epicgenius, for the effort that went into expanding this article. It grew more than fivefold within the past 7 days and is brilliantly written and sourced. I see no neutrality or copyright issues. I love how it links to potential new articles (e.g. Maureen Hackett). I wonder if Susan E. Wagner could be notable if she was as active in society as the article states. The image is lovely in this size; shout-out and thanks to Jim.henderson for it. No doubt we'll be seeing more of this article on the Main Page. Surtsicna (talk) 17:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gracie Mansion/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 19:15, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Lightburst (talk · contribs) 02:52, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I enjoy reviewing your articles and I often have a start because I saw them first at DYK. I look forward to reviewing this one, it may take me a bit. Lightburst (talk) 02:52, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

All are properly licensed: three are from the Library of Congress and the other 6 are from users and Flickr. They add interest and are appropriate. Lightburst (talk) 03:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar and other[edit]

"and it has also received accolades and been depicted in numerous media works." might be missing a word before been depicted
In the body we have "also known as Archibald Gracie Mansion" there is already a redirect from that title, so would it make sense to add this to the lead in bold?
This line reads funny to me, like conversational English. "The Europeans settled what is now New York City" what do you think?
This line also "This made Gracie Mansion one of a relative few official mayoral residences" It is up to you.
"New York City cultural affairs commissioner" Also wondering about capitalization here
"interior decorators; and Dianne Pilgrim and David McFadden were employed as the curators." Not sure the word and should appear after the semi
"designs of each room has been changed" might have meant to say have
"Prior to 1942," clearer language would be before
"There are also a service door" maybe is
"Wagner ballroom." unsure if ballroom should be capitalized
"New-York Historical Society" I do not think New York should be hyphenated
"interior scenes were actually filmed at Wave Hill" actually may be an unnecessary word
In the Previous site usage section the prose seems random and out of order from the end of the second paragraph and through the third.
Not sure if the citation should be inside the parenthesis here "mayor invited to the mansion[24])" I see this several times in the article so you intended to do it. I will research to see if this is MOS.
This line may read as conversational "Gracie was so wealthy that, when he lost $1 million in 1807 due to naval blockades, his net worth was hardly affected." what do you think?
I lose track of "Moses" as only his last name is used in the Conversion and La Guardia use section. Maybe use his full name at least once there?
"Susan had to change in a closet when official city meetings encroached into the mansion's living space" I know what this means but maybe we should make it clearer?
Would you consider using $ inflation templates? All of the expansions and repairs - especially the large amounts from the annex section - the amounts seem low but with inflation were actually high.
missing context for this line in the Koch use and expansion section? "He decided to live at Gracie Mansion full-time after having dinner there with his family" and "within four years, Koch had gone through four chefs"
asbestos abatement could use a link? And should ocher be ocher?
"mansion includes around 14 rooms" do we know how many?


Infobox[edit]

Citation 1 goes to a search page. Can that be fixed?

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    See notes
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    See notes
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: