Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Add a new request

Remove all requests

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

I Miss You, I'm Sorry (Gracie Abrams song) (currently a redirect to I Miss You, I'm Sorry) → I Miss You, I'm Sorry (move · discuss) – Only notable song with that title that has an article. BePlus (talk) 17:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the requested destination is already a disambig page, which will have to be re-titled. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Or it could just be deleted, since there's no other article. Either way. Station1 (talk) 19:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

Contested technical requests

Guy Boyd (sculptor) → Guy Martin à Beckett Boyd (currently a redirect back to Guy Boyd (sculptor)) (move · discuss) – This is the subject's actual name. The Adventures of the Not So Venerable Mr. Siggs (talk) 21:54, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- It's his full name but not his common name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:46, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Very wisely, he didn't use this, nor is he known as this. Johnbod (talk) 12:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Adventures of the Not So Venerable Mr. Siggs This request has been contested as non-controversial. If you wish to proceed with the move, please click on the "discuss" link in your request above to open a move discussion on teh article's talk page. --Ahecht (TALK
  PAGE) 14:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Airtel Bangladesh → Airtel (Bangladesh) (currently a redirect back to Airtel Bangladesh) (move · discuss) – Airtel Bangladesh was a independent company till 2016. At now Airtel is a licensed brand of Robi Axiata Ltd. So it should be moved on the proposd title. ~ Farhan Snigdho ^(message) 06:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This move doesn't seem necessary to me, per WP:NATURALDIS and WP:TITLECON - all other entries at Category:Bharti Airtel are of the form Airtel <NameOfCountry>... Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 11:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In other entries Airtel is an independent brand but in Bangladesh and Sri Lanka it is a brand of Axiata where 'Airtel' is a licensed brand name from Bharti Airtel. ~ Farhan Snigdho ^(message) 04:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:1948dlj/sandbox (currently a redirect to Draft:Medieval garden) → Medieval garden (currently a redirect instead to Monastic garden) (move · discuss) – New article - currently a bad redirect in place Johnbod (talk) 12:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnbod, 1948dlj: I had initially moved this to mainspace, but on further thought I moved it to Draft:Medieval garden as it needs a lead sentence, still has fake placeholder references, and has other issues such as curly quotes that need to be cleaned up per the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stuart station (Brightline) → Stuart station (move · discuss) – Only contemporary "Stuart station" in a 21st Century setting, currently being planned, all other "Stuart stations" are obscure, historic stations, and most of them don't have their own articles. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 18:46, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stuart station (Iowa) is an NHRP-designated heritage building, and Stuart station (Brightline) hasn't even started construction. This is not a slam-dunk primary topic. 162 etc. (talk) 15:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OrdinaryScarlett This request has been contested as non-controversial. If you wish to proceed with the move, please click on the "discuss" link in your request above to open a move discussion on teh article's talk page. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rub-A-Dub-Dub (currently a redirect to Rub-a-dub-dub) → Rub-A-Dub-Dub (song) (currently a redirect instead to Rub-a-dub-dub (disambiguation)) (move · discuss) – Not a primary topic when compared to Rub-A-Dub-Dub (novel) in terms of page views. Rub-A-Dub-Dub could then be redirected to Rub-a-dub-dub (disambiguation). Kidneyspr (talk) 04:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The nursery rhyme seems to also sometimes be considered a song. It has the Roud Folk Song Index number 3101, so maybe the Hank Thompson song should be at Rub-A-Dub-Dub (country music song). I also wonder about the capital 'A' and MOS:CT; the only cited sources seem to use all-caps. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kidneyspr: This request has been contested as non-controversial. If you wish to proceed with the move, please click on the "discuss" link in your request above to open a move discussion on teh article's talk page. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tajiks of Xinjiang → Pamiris of Xinjiang (move · discuss) – The so-called "Tajiks of Xinjiang." Qupothop (talk) 05:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There have been many passionate arguments about this at the article's talk page, going back as far as 2009. Yes there is a problem with what the Chinese government calls them, but this request can't possibly be "Uncontroversial". ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 12:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qupothop: This request has been contested as non-controversial. If you wish to proceed with the move, please click on the "discuss" link in your request above to open a move discussion on teh article's talk page. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed