User talk:Moneytrees: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 13:30, 22 February 2020

±

vn-26

This user talk page has been vandalized 26 times.

This is Moneytrees's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31: 3 days

Hang in there

I know this must suck. Do your best to ignore it as much as you can, maybe find something else to distract yourself for the next day or so. --valereee (talk) 15:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the words of encouragement, Valereee. I'm actually doing pretty well right now; the stressful part was the actual rfa, and I honestly don't care too much about the 'crats verdict; if I get it, yay, if I don't, I can just run again in a few months with a few more articles under my belt (working on Pen & Pixel right now!) and win easily. Money emoji💵^{Talk💸Help out at CCI!} 16:01, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am known for being particularly grumpy, but I read the above remark as just ever so slightly overly cocky (in my opinion ... others will think differently) and it just ever so slighty risks losing votes on a re-run. Obviously I hope you make it and this time as you just got my !vote and this is from someone who is known from getting into the odd scrape and is not entitled to preach .... and you are indeed a breath of fresh air ! Djm-leighpark (talk) 06:31, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't get it this time, you'd definitely smash it on a re-run! Nosebagbear (talk) 18:04, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

+1 to the above! You'll do great! (But do still take the advice of the opposers) Puddleglum ^2.0 02:15, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That was unfortunate. I'm sure you'll make it next time, and thanks for everything you do around here. All the best, SarahSV ^(talk) 00:07, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles

Hey Money - I can't say I envy you going through a crat chat following that RfA, but good on you for keeping a positive attitude in the comments above. I'm just dropping by to offer assistance/collaboration/pointers, should you need/want them, when you're creating new content. I imagine that there are some parallels between my primary area of activity (CV) and yours (CCI) - time-consuming, repetitive and largely thankless tasks, but vitally important for maintaining the project. I like to come up for air regularly and write an article, and always find the content creation space much more pleasurable to work in. So, if you fancy working on something together, let me know - you can suggest a subject, or I could suggest one. (Warning - it will be an historic building in Scotland - I have a big backlog of them to work through, but they're not going anywhere so there's no rush!) Or, if you don't fancy collaborating on something, but ever want to reach out for a second opinion - just drop me a note, I'd be delighted to help out any way I can. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 19:27, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Girth Summit, Oh, thank you very much! I'd happily collaborate with you in the future; as for the crat chat, eh, it's not too bad. I wouldn't half mind it being no consensus, since that'll give me a better excuse to write more stuff. Money emoji💵^{Talk💸Help out at CCI!} 19:57, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How serendipitous. I drop by to wish you luck and enquire if you fancy an article collaboration in order to tick that off, and Girth is here already. If rather than an obscure Scottish building you fancy an obscure military conflict or person then give me a ping.

PS I also do copy editing. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:37, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your efficiency. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Clovermoss submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I nominate Money emoji to be Editor of the Week. He has been on Wikipedia for 2 years and has over 10K in mainspace editing. He was recently appointed as an arbcom clerk trainee, and I am confident that he will do a great efficient job. To date, Money emoji has done an impressive amount of work relating to copyright-related matters on Wikipedia, with particularly notable contributions to WP:CCI. Cases there can remain open for years, and Money emoji has shown commendable effort and has made substantial efforts to reduce this backlog.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}

Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 13:25, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color:#606570" |'''Editor of the Week'''
 |-
-|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid lightgray" |Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]] in recognition of {{{briefreason}}}. Thank you for the great contributions! <span style="color:#a0a2a5">(courtesy of the [[WP:WER|<span style="color:#80c0ff">Wikipedia Editor Retention Project</span>]])</span>
+|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid lightgray" |Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]] in recognition of your efficiency. Thank you for the great contributions! <span style="color:#a0a2a5">(courtesy of the [[WP:WER|<span style="color:#80c0ff">Wikipedia Editor Retention Project</span>]])</span>
 |}
-[[User:{{{nominator}}}]] submitted the following nomination for [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]]:
+[[User:Clovermoss]] submitted the following nomination for [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]]:
+:I nominate Money emoji to be Editor of the Week. He has been on Wikipedia for 2 years and has over 10K in mainspace editing. He was recently appointed as an arbcom clerk trainee, and I am confident that he will do a great efficient job. To date, Money emoji has done an impressive amount of work relating to copyright-related matters on Wikipedia, with particularly notable contributions to [[WP:CCI]]. Cases there can remain open for years, and Money emoji has shown commendable effort and has made substantial efforts to reduce this backlog.
-:{{{nominationtext}}}
 You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
 <pre>{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}</pre>