User talk:Enterprisey

• Home
• Talk
• Contribs
• Awards
• Creations
• CSDs
• PRODs
• Dashboard

Lantern Entertainment is different from The Weinstein Company

Hi - I posted this on the Lantern Entertainment Talk page and saw you had undid some of the corrections, based on the below conversation was hoping you could assist in making the necessary corrections to the page/create a new Lantern Entertainment page. I haven't heard from user DGG since he agreed to make the split and as you are able to make edits and are a neutral party was hoping you could help.

Disclosing that I am an employee of the company Lantern Entertainment, I am noting that this article is incorrect in saying Lantern Entertainment is the new name for The Weinstein Company. The correct information is that The Weinstein Company has effectively dissolved and sold its assets in a bankruptcy court to Lantern Capital for $289 million. Lantern Entertainment owns those assets, but is an entirely separate company. How can this page be edited to reflect the accurate information?

references: https://deadline.com/2018/07/weinstein-company-sale-approved-judge-lantern-capital-1202424618/

https://www.thewrap.com/weinstein-co-lantern-entertainment/

• I think we do need two articles. The Weinstein Company is by far the better known at present, and the principal article should be at that name, and will give the information about the sale of the assets. Latern is notable enough by itself for a separate page, where the link can be briefly stated. I'm prepared to do the split. DGG ( talk ) 17:10, 9 August 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.44.162.86 (talk)

Bumping thread. Should probably take a look at this sometime. Enterprisey (talk!) 23:29, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

• r Enterprisey (talk!) 04:52, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk page messages

Hi, I noticed you left messages on a few users' talk pages regarding the INTADMIN debate. I'm sure this was in good faith, but if you're going to notify some users then you need to notify everyone who was involved with the discussion, otherwise if could be seen as WP:CANVASsing. Please could you go back and notify all participants. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amakuru (talk • contribs) 09:37, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

I was trying not to indiscriminately spam all participants, and I'm only picking users who've made proposals on that page so far (to get constructive feedback on the proposal). I'll add a note to the discussion, though, as I forgot to do that. Enterprisey (talk!) 17:12, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Justlettersandnumbers RFA

The reason I undid your edit was because I saw that Cyberbot had counted a neutral !vote even though there was none, and I thought your edit screwed it up. Thanks for fixing it. Looks like everything is okay now. — MRD2014 ^Talk 23:12, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

No problem Enterprisey (talk!) 23:16, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

reply-link

I've only had a quick tinker with this script this morning, but it seems to solve a really obvious requirement. I don't know if you remember the debacle with Liquid Threads and Flow, but I remember reading that and thinking "what we need is to keep it simple, have a nicer user interface but keep the back end exactly the same so there's a backwards compatibility route". I've been around the block with software development enough now to know that if you try to solve a problem by throwing out the old system and replacing it with a new one, you are screwed. If the WMF had developed this instead, they would have got the problem solved without all that excessive faffing about. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:07, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, I definitely remember the LiquidThreads stuff - total lack of compatibility with existing processes. I tried taking design cues from Flow for this, especially the "waiting" animation and the overall shape of the design, so that turned out pretty well. Enterprisey (talk!) 05:20, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Toolbar

For some reason, debug mode says something about "index.php?title=User:Apoc2400/refToolbarPlus.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript:1 You installed the userscript User:Apoc2400/refToolbarPlus.js It is no longer working and you should uninstall it." Any idea why it's not working? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:45, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Not sure looking at the code, TenPoundHammer. Is this still happening? Enterprisey (talk!) 23:13, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

TenPoundHammer, that was because of this. reftoolbar is a default enabled gadget, you don't need to manually load it, and the version you loaded was also no longer working. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 10:34, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Bug in afch-dev.js: Decline reason is posted when rejecting draft

Hi Enterprisey, thanks for maintaining the AFCH script. Currently, there is a minor bug in User:Enterprisey/afch-dev.js that causes the decline reason to be posted when I'm rejecting a draft. Here is a summary of what happens:

1. The user clicks the "Decline/Reject" button.
2. The user types in a decline reason.
3. The user decides to reject the draft, and chooses the "Reject" radio button.
4. Since the reject reason field is empty, the user types in a reject reason.
5. The user clicks on the "Decline submission" button.
6. Both the decline and reject reasons are posted on the draft page.

A couple of changes would improve the user experience:

1. The decline and reject reason fields should be in sync when the user switches between the "Decline" and "Reject" radio buttons.
2. When rejecting or declining, only one comment should be posted on the draft page.
3. The "Decline submission" button should be renamed to "Reject submission" when the "Reject" radio button is selected.

Thanks for all of your work on this script. I really appreciate it! — Newslinger talk 02:41, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Definitely good ideas! Will get around to them when I have time. For now, tracked on GitHub. Enterprisey (talk!) 23:12, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Question

Hello! I was wondering if you had any advice for someone looking to get into user scripting. I have a handful of ideas I want to build + some older unmaintained scripts I would like to try keeping up to date. I have experience in JavaScript and a few other languages. Mostly wondering if you had any tips or good resources to look at. Thanks! {{u|zchrykng}} {T|C} 21:43, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Zchrykng, it's great that you want to get into script writing! I find it to be a really great and rewarding way to contribute. Feel free to ask me any specific questions that come up, but for starters I'd say the pages listed in the "Script writing" row in Wikipedia:User_scripts/Navbox are pretty helpful. Enterprisey (talk!) 22:33, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! I will take a look later. zchrykng (talk) 02:05, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Using Navpops to fix linked misspellings

Hi, nice meeting you. Here's the link to the archive where I made my request online. I'd really appreciate it if you could add the option to pipe or not pipe... oh, I see, you responded to me back then! Thanks, wbm1058 (talk) 02:06, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Text to image

Hello, Ent. I made a toolbar script yesterday that links to Special:RandomInCategory/Category:Pending AfC submissions but I can't seem to change the displayed text. Is there a way to change the text "RSu" to an image, for example - File:Book with Lens Flat Icon Vector.svg? This is the code:

$.when( mw.loader.using('mediawiki.util'), $.ready ).then( function() {mw.util.addPortletLink( 'p-views', '/wiki/Special:RandomInCategory/Pending_AfC_submissions', 'RSu', , 'Go to random draft submission', 'l');})

Your help is appreciated. Flooded with them hundreds 10:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

You could probably write a CSS rule to set the background-image to that image, and then set the font-size of the link to zero to hide it. Something like mw.util.addCSS( "#p-views { font-size: 0; background-image: url(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5f/Book_with_Lens_Flat_Icon_Vector.svg); }" ); (warning: not tested at all)? Enterprisey (talk!) 05:14, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Wishlist item to globally implement something similar to your 'reply link' script

User:Enterprisey/reply-link is SUCH a good idea, the only problem is that the people most in need of it won't have it and will have to learn to reply the hard way (new users and logged out users). I logged a wishlist item at meta:Community Wishlist Survey 2019/Editing/Reply link for talk pages to make something similar as a default-on gadget. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 08:58, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

• Thanks! Enterprisey (talk!) 05:04, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

reply-link has a Russian twin!

Not sure where to put this, so I might as well mention it here: the same idea behind reply-link was apparently implemented on ru.wp back in February of this year: ru:Участник:Jack_who_built_the_house/convenientDiscussions.js. Maybe we should merge the two? I don't speak Russian and thus don't understand the interface, but it looks pretty cool. Enterprisey (talk!) 05:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

That script seems uncannily similar. Has a nice drop down with more options and change to edit summary. Mhakes things look a bit like flow which is ehhh. Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:03, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Galobtter, regarding the comment you deleted about my sleep schedule... I was waiting for someone to comment on that, lol. I would put my average bedtime anywhere from 2 to 4 AM, so I'm a bit of a night owl - made WikiConference quite a shock! I have an ongoing project of making my bedtime earlier, but it may take a while. Thanks for the advice, though!

Also, yeah, if the options available there look interesting (after I get them translated), I'll totally add them. There already seems to be some sort of button that lets you reply at the end of a section, without having to hunt for the final signature, which I'll add. Enterprisey (talk!) 06:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Few comments. 1) having a button to comment at the bottom of a section would be great for RfD, RfA, etc for adding a !vote at the bottom. 2) having a button to wrap a section in atop/abot, or hat/bat, would be handy in a lot of the same places as reply-link is, though I understand if it is out of scope for this. 3) reply-to is apparently broken on this page at the moment. ;P zchrykng (talk) 06:46, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Great suggestions! Regarding your third point, it seems fine on my end. What browser, and if you're getting errors in the browser console, can you paste them here? Enterprisey (talk!) 07:35, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Don't think it applies, but this is the only error I was getting.

load.php?debug=false&lang=en&modules=jquery%2Coojs-ui-core%2Coojs-ui-widgets&skin=vector&version=021l06a:130 [Report Only] Refused to connect to 'https://xtools.wmflabs.org/api/page/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Enterprisey?format=html&uselang=en' because it violates the following Content Security Policy directive: "default-src 'self' data: blob: upload.wikimedia.org https://commons.wikimedia.org meta.wikimedia.org *.wikimedia.org *.wikipedia.org *.wikinews.org *.wiktionary.org *.wikibooks.org *.wikiversity.org *.wikisource.org wikisource.org *.wikiquote.org *.wikidata.org *.wikivoyage.org *.mediawiki.org wikimedia.org". Note that 'connect-src' was not explicitly set, so 'default-src' is used as a fallback."

Browser is Chrome Version 69.0.3497.100 (Official Build) (32-bit)

I'm getting reply-to links up until the bump template above "Request regeneration of results". zchrykng (talk) 07:45, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

For the record, this edit fixes the problem for me. zchrykng (talk) 14:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

While I'm throwing up ideas, what about the option to wrap the entire reply in a html tag, <small> for instance? zchrykng (talk) 14:22, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Sounds like a great idea; added to the list. Enterprisey (talk!) 20:53, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

TemplateSandbox

Could you enable User:Enterprisey/sync-template-sandbox on module sandboxes? Thanks; the script is very helpful. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:29, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Done! Let me know if there are issues. Enterprisey (talk!) 20:55, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Recently Active Users

Hello Enterprisey. I was recently observing the recently active users log and noticed that the link for myself leads to a blocked sock impersonating me (User:HickoryOughtShirt). This seems to be a similar problem for "Cote d'Azur" (turns to User:Cote d). On the help desk, it was pointed out the tool may have problems with percent-encoding of special characters and links. I am not very familiar in this area and of course this is not an urgent issue, it was just a problem you may want to address. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 20:11, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Yep, certainly my bad for not escaping links correctly. Will get on that soonish. Enterprisey (talk!) 20:53, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Fixed now. Enterprisey (talk!) 00:46, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel - "publish"?

Hello Enterprisey, thank you for creating yet another very useful tool (manually extracting and double-checking the diffs was always a pain). Would you mind if I added this tool to WP:COPYVIO in "Other ressources", or is it too early for general usage? I have already used it in a few cases without problems, and the GUI seems quite intuitive (considering Wikipedia's spartanic history interface). GermanJoe (talk) 17:23, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

GermanJoe, yup, the script is basically done and has no bugs that I can find. No problem! Enterprisey (talk!) 17:58, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

And done. Figured I ask first :), thanks again for all your efforts with scripting. GermanJoe (talk) 18:09, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

No problem, glad you like the script! Enterprisey (talk!) 18:32, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

RevDel (shhh...) Thanks

Just wanted to drop my thanks for yet another script - I've had it for about 5 revdels but I've finally remembered to use it to save myself all that agro, tah very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nosebagbear (talk • contribs) 23:00, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

No problem! Glad you like it! Enterprisey (talk!) 00:22, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

An issue with your unblock-review.js script

Hi Enterprisey! I gotta start off by saying: I definitely love your unblock-review.js script a lot! It definitely saves a good few minutes of time messing with the template and it's (mostly) been working just fine. I ran into an issue with it, however, when attempting to respond to an unblock request where the user used {{unblock-un}} to add a username change request alongside their request. If you look at the diff here where I used your script to respond to the request, it overwrote the template with {{unblock}}, which will obviously cause issues there ;-). But I also noticed that your script adds the "decline=" to the first default argument instead of the last one at the end of the template as well. When users copy the instructions to request an unblock and with a username change request, they're told the exact location to put each argument (1=, 2=, etc). I think that this will also add issues and in this exact situation... but now that I think about it while I type this out... that also doesn't make sense... but it does... I'll need to test it. Anyways, thought I'd let you know about this. Thanks again for writing this script! I hope you plan on implementing a fix in this situation so that I can use it with these unblock requests as well :-D. Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:59, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

TL;DR: It'll be fixed soon.

As you can see, I've been editing a lot less recently, partially due to IRL stuff and partially due to this new thing I'm coding; it should make every script that works by inserting new things into wikitext a TON more accurate, and should resolve this particular issue entirely. It's pretty hard, though, so it may take a while. Enterprisey (talk!) 02:13, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

No worries! And thanks again for the script! Keep healthy and be well; real life obligations should always come first. Cheers :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:28, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Script/tool request

Hi Enterprisey

I have used several of your tools and know you have technical wizardry. I have a relatively simply request for a script or wmflabs tool which counts "bad" AfC acceptances. The basic operation is as follows:

1. Scan the history of Wikipedia:Articles for creation/recent for articles accepted by a user.
2. Check to see if the articles exist.
3. Return a percentage of exist/doesn't exist and a list of articles which no longer exist.

If possible:

• Also check the articles to see if they are redirects.
• Check the move log for the titles to detect if they were moved in to a new title.
• Check the move log for articles moved to the draftspace.
• Parse the deletion rationales to return the deletion reason and list it with the articles.

It may be possible to use timestamps of acceptance/move/deletion to reduce false positives with old move log entries that are not relevant. And perhaps check the deletion log to detect recreated articles even if there is an article at the title.

Thanks. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 22:05, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

This is a fantastic idea for the tool, and I will implement this when I have free time. Enterprisey (talk!) 02:15, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Bug in AFCH beta script

Hi! Recently, I declined Draft:Lalon Geeti, according to the edit history, the script should be notifying Neverdie1672018. However, it notified Enamur Syed instead (diff). The user has been renamed on 12 Nov, but the draft was submitted on 5 Nov. Maybe the script notifies the user who submitted the draft without checking if the user has been renamed or not. Can you fix this "bug" (or maybe I'm wrong)? Thanks. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 02:16, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Seems like a bit of an edge case, so I'd assume we don't check for user renames. I'm tracking this on GitHub and will get to it eventually. Enterprisey (talk!) 03:58, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Suggestions to quick-before

Hi, Enterprisey, and thanks for quick-before. Could you use something like encodeURIComponent(pageName.replace(/_/g, " ")) (or whatever the correct code is) so that a space substitues an underscores in the search string? The search result for e.g. "Lemon_plum" is quite different from "Lemon plum". Could the search result open in a new tab, please? Thanks, Sam Sailor 08:51, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks for reporting this! Enterprisey (talk!) 22:50, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Del sorting script: tab complete

It sure would be great for deletion sorting if I could tab complete the selection of topic areas. Is that possible with OOUI? --Izno (talk) 18:44, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Izno, that's a great idea! Which text field are you talking about: the normal, upper field, or the "custom lists" fields? For the second one, I could enable the same sort of autocomplete that already runs on the upper list without too much trouble. Enterprisey (talk!) 09:01, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Hmm, not sure I communicated exactly what I wanted. :) Right now, there is already autocomplete in the field I care about (which is the DELSORT field)--what I'm looking for is that once the item has been selected by the autocompletion, I want to be able to hit tab to select it. --Izno (talk) 13:38, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Revision Deletion script

Have you ever thought of expanding your CopyVio RevDel request script to include all Revision Delete criteria? After all, someone made the template {{Revdel-rd3}}. I think it would be nice if we could have that, as well as RD2, RD5, and RD6 added to the script. funplussmart (talk) 01:36, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

That would be a pretty good suggestion, but per WP:REVDELREQUEST there should be no on-wiki way to request these. I've gone ahead and TfD'd it. Should there be a way to get some revision ranges output as wikitext or plain links? Probably, and I've made a note to myself to add that to the script. Enterprisey (talk!) 05:52, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Automated cleanup tagging

	Newbie-nursing award
	Thank you very much for your excellent Wishlist proposal on adding inline cleanup template buttons to automated editing tools such as Twinkle and Huggle. It seems like it could substantially increase newbie retention[1] and save the wikis from slow death by ever-declining editor numbers. Best wishes for your newborn idea! HLHJ (talk) 07:36, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! I hope it does does well too. Enterprisey (talk!) 09:28, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome, do let me know how it goes. I've just posted about it here, here, and here. Amazingly, someone has already fixed and error in one of my posts, then gone and voted for the proposal, which is very encouraging! HLHJ (talk) 19:51, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Wishlist support counting

I saw your message on IRC. I wanted to let you know that we do have a bot that creates a voting report, we just haven't turned it on yet. From previous surveys it seems this report sort of gamifies the process, where people might focus on the popular proposals and not the others. So I think the plan is to wait another day or so to give everyone time to browse through all the proposals, then we'll turn on the automated report for the remainder of the voting phase. Best, — MusikAnimal ^talk 18:34, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Editor of the Week

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

Kevin submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

Depending on how you approach the Wikipedia editing experience, you might know Enterprisey's name well – or you might not know it at all. Even if you don't, you've probably benefited from his work. Enterprisey is one of our most valuable technical editors. His user scripts are immensely useful and powerful and include such pillars of the project as the AfC helper script (used by all Articles for Creation reviewers – its current version alone has been used over 41,000 times), the delsort script (which makes sorting AfDs easier, used over 14,000 times, reply-link (a script to make replying to talk page comments easier, used over 1,000 times), and countless more. His labs tools are part of many workflows and include such things as xfd-stats (used to generate statistics about editors' XfD votes) and vote-history (which shows the progression of votes in discussions over time). Unlike many technical editors, though, he's also diligently at work writing articles – among his 14 article creations and 4 DYKs is everything from Convolutional neural network to Gallimathias musicum. He doesn't seem fame or recognition, and has stayed unfailingly polite and superhumanly patient every time I have interacted with him. For all these reasons and more, it is my great honor to nominate Enterprisey to be Editor of the Week.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}

Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 23:07, 19 November 2018 (UTC)