User talk:QueerFilmNerd: Difference between revisions
→Happy first edit day!: Template for EotW |
→Editor of the Week: Conrats. Other members of your team will receive awards in the coming weeks |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color:#606570" |'''Editor of the Week''' |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color:#606570" |'''Editor of the Week''' |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid lightgray" |Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]] in recognition of |
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid lightgray" |Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]] in recognition of your great teamwork with others. Thank you for the great contributions! <span style="color:#a0a2a5">(courtesy of the [[WP:WER|<span style="color:#80c0ff">Wikipedia Editor Retention Project</span>]])</span> |
||
|} |
|} |
||
[[User: |
[[User:Buster7]] submitted the following nomination for [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]]: |
||
:I would like to nominate QueerFilmNerd for being one of a group of editors that displayed excellent teamwork. Discussions, consultations, deliberations and concessions are the benchmarks of editors working toward a common goal. One of the more challenging editing tasks is to manage and manipulate input into an article that is in flux, an article that's "real life history" is developing daily. Such an article was the recent [[March For Our Lives]]. The team of editors, of which QueerFilmNerd was a part, deserve separate individual recognition as Editors of the Week because they came together and worked on the maps, before and after the event, and they did a fantastic job. One need only look at [[Talk:March For Our Lives#Maps]] to see the positive interactions that resulted in a timely and quality addition to the encyclopedia. |
|||
:{{{nominationtext}}} |
|||
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week: |
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week: |
||
<pre>{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}</pre> |
<pre>{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}</pre> |
||
Revision as of 16:14, 14 April 2018
Harington and Leslie's engagement
What do you mean that we should wait for a comment from them? Their engagement has been announced and various reliable sources including BBC have reported it. I'm sure that if it was only a rumor, a reliable source like BBC wouldn't have reported it. By the way, their names have appeared in the Times newspaper on the section for upcoming marriages. Keivan.fTalk 07:25, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Reread the People article, my bad. It's just been a long day for me.--QueerFilmNerd (talk) 08:19, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, QueerFilmNerd. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 11:09, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Happy first edit day!
|
Happy First Edit Day, QueerFilmNerd, I was doin' something else and happened to notice that yesterday was your first edit day. Thanks for staying on board the Goodship Wikipedia. Have a great day! ―Buster7 ☎ 20:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC) |
- Aw, thank you!--QueerFilmNerd (talk) 02:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Editor of the Week
|
Editor of the Week | |
| Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great teamwork with others. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:Buster7 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
- I would like to nominate QueerFilmNerd for being one of a group of editors that displayed excellent teamwork. Discussions, consultations, deliberations and concessions are the benchmarks of editors working toward a common goal. One of the more challenging editing tasks is to manage and manipulate input into an article that is in flux, an article that's "real life history" is developing daily. Such an article was the recent March For Our Lives. The team of editors, of which QueerFilmNerd was a part, deserve separate individual recognition as Editors of the Week because they came together and worked on the maps, before and after the event, and they did a fantastic job. One need only look at Talk:March For Our Lives#Maps to see the positive interactions that resulted in a timely and quality addition to the encyclopedia.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 16:10, 14 April 2018 (UTC)