User talk:CatRacer22: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 71: Line 71:
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color:#606570" |'''Editor of the Week'''
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color:#606570" |'''Editor of the Week'''
|-
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid lightgray" |Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]] in recognition of {{{briefreason}}}. Thank you for the great contributions! <span style="color:#a0a2a5">(courtesy of the [[WP:WER|<span style="color:#80c0ff">Wikipedia Editor Retention Project</span>]])</span>
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid lightgray" |Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]] in recognition of your actions to improve the encyclopedia. Thank you for the great contributions! <span style="color:#a0a2a5">(courtesy of the [[WP:WER|<span style="color:#80c0ff">Wikipedia Editor Retention Project</span>]])</span>
|}
|}
[[User:{{{nominator}}}]] submitted the following nomination for [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]]:
[[User:MX]] submitted the following nomination for [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]]:
:I am happy to nominate MWright to Editor of the Week. He is a 5-year Wikipedian with over 5 Featured Articles, 77 Good Articles, 80+ Good Article Reviews, and close to [[User:MWright96/DYK|40 DYKs]]! You don't come across [[User:MWright96/FA-GA|these well-rounded Wikipedia resumes]] often. He is the go-to expert for motor racing articles, and has done a lot of work in this under-represented area of Wikipedia. I came across his work for the first time when [[2013 Monaco GP2 Series round]] reached the Main Page via DYK. I later reviewed one of his GAs, [[2017 Mexico City ePrix]], and grew more interested in his work. I decided to nominate him because he's been quite active with our GA backlog; his name has been popping up often in my Watchlist because he is reviewing articles often (not to mention his reviews are extremely thorough). Happy to have MWright96 be Editor of the Week!
:{{{nominationtext}}}
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
<pre>{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}</pre>
<pre>{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}</pre>

Revision as of 16:53, 22 January 2018

The Signpost
16 May 2024
 

Template:Archive box collapsible

Your GA nomination of 2017 Monaco ePrix

The article 2017 Monaco ePrix you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2017 Monaco ePrix for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bcschneider53 -- Bcschneider53 (talk) 18:21, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2017 Monaco ePrix

The article 2017 Monaco ePrix you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2017 Monaco ePrix for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bcschneider53 -- Bcschneider53 (talk) 19:41, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2017 Paris ePrix

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2017 Paris ePrix you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 00:41, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2017 Paris ePrix

The article 2017 Paris ePrix you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2017 Paris ePrix for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 15:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Informational query

hey. You seem to be quite active in the sports section of GAN. If I may ask, why has the nom for Josh McCown been sitting at GAN for an entire year? I am not connected to the article, just compuzzled. Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 04:37, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Lingzhi: Hi. Thank you for your concern. The answer is was because I dissuaded myself from reviewing the McCown article because of its large size. Hence, I reviewed smaller articles which were easier to review. MWright96 (talk) 09:59, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Lingzhi: As a background, there was a review but the reviewer, Wizardman, went on wikibreak and said "If it still hasn't been picked up when I return then I'll resume from where I left off." Also at User_talk:BlueMoonset#Backlog, another user said "I'm also skipping Josh McCown because it looks like Wizardman will pick it back up". WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 23:26, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I was just curious. I did boatloads of GA reviews a decade ago (under a different username), then gave that up, then went back about a year or two ago. On that second occasion I was lashed like the dog I am in WT:GAN for asking too much from the nominator, so I walked away again. I might do GA reviews that only check for surface features. maybe. But I wouldn't have time to check Josh McCown really well until perhaps... perhaps 3 weeks from now. It's a pity that GA doesn't allow (without *requiring*) multiple reviewers like FAC does; if that were the case, I could chip in a few comments. Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 06:10, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2014 Brazilian Grand Prix

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2014 Brazilian Grand Prix you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 15:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2014 24 Hours of Le Mans

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2014 24 Hours of Le Mans you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 10:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2014 24 Hours of Le Mans

The article 2014 24 Hours of Le Mans you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2014 24 Hours of Le Mans for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 11:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2014 24 Hours of Le Mans

The article 2014 24 Hours of Le Mans you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2014 24 Hours of Le Mans for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 22:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2014 Brazilian Grand Prix

The article 2014 Brazilian Grand Prix you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2014 Brazilian Grand Prix for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 18:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2014 Brazilian Grand Prix

The article 2014 Brazilian Grand Prix you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2014 Brazilian Grand Prix for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 16:42, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Running Man Barnstar
Thank you for your great work on the 2014 Formula One season race articles. I hope you can keep it going and bring all of them to GA status! I know from my experience with the 2015 articles that this is a long, but rewarding journey. Keep up the good work! Zwerg Nase (talk) 16:53, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2014 United States Grand Prix

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2014 United States Grand Prix you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bcschneider53 -- Bcschneider53 (talk) 00:41, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2014 United States Grand Prix

The article 2014 United States Grand Prix you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2014 United States Grand Prix for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bcschneider53 -- Bcschneider53 (talk) 20:02, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week

Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your actions to improve the encyclopedia. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:MX submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I am happy to nominate MWright to Editor of the Week. He is a 5-year Wikipedian with over 5 Featured Articles, 77 Good Articles, 80+ Good Article Reviews, and close to 40 DYKs! You don't come across these well-rounded Wikipedia resumes often. He is the go-to expert for motor racing articles, and has done a lot of work in this under-represented area of Wikipedia. I came across his work for the first time when 2013 Monaco GP2 Series round reached the Main Page via DYK. I later reviewed one of his GAs, 2017 Mexico City ePrix, and grew more interested in his work. I decided to nominate him because he's been quite active with our GA backlog; his name has been popping up often in my Watchlist because he is reviewing articles often (not to mention his reviews are extremely thorough). Happy to have MWright96 be Editor of the Week!

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week: 

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}

Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 16:47, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CatRacer22&oldid=821786928"