User talk:Exemplo347: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 79: Line 79:
My page Pink Floyd Records contains no advertising, propaganda or "sandboxing" of any kind. Please stop undoing my page. I apologize for any inconvenience i might have caused. Thank you. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Crimson1216|Crimson1216]] ([[User talk:Crimson1216#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Crimson1216|contribs]]) 02:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
My page Pink Floyd Records contains no advertising, propaganda or "sandboxing" of any kind. Please stop undoing my page. I apologize for any inconvenience i might have caused. Thank you. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Crimson1216|Crimson1216]] ([[User talk:Crimson1216#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Crimson1216|contribs]]) 02:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Greetings. Your article was reviewed independently by myself and another editor, and both of us agree that it's not appropriate for inclusion. Please do not recreate your article again in its current format. Use the Article Creation wizard in the future and submit a Draft version of your article for review. Good luck with your future editing. [[User:Exemplo347|Exemplo347]] ([[User talk:Exemplo347#top|talk]]) 02:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
:Greetings. Your article was reviewed independently by myself and another editor, and both of us agree that it's not appropriate for inclusion. Please do not recreate your article again in its current format. Use the Article Creation wizard in the future and submit a Draft version of your article for review. Good luck with your future editing. [[User:Exemplo347|Exemplo347]] ([[User talk:Exemplo347#top|talk]]) 02:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

== Editor of the Week ==

{| style="border: 2px solid lightgray; background-color: #fafafa" color:#aaa"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[File:Editor of the week barnstar.svg|100px]]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color:#606570" |'''Editor of the Week'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid lightgray" |Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]] for your work with new editors. Thank you for the great contributions! <span style="color:#a0a2a5">(courtesy of the [[WP:WER|<span style="color:#80c0ff">Wikipedia Editor Retention Project</span>]])</span>
|}
[[User:Buster7]] submitted the following nomination for [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]]:
:Getting new editors to understand the environment of Wikipedia is not any easy task especially when you have just requested a speedy deletion on their "Masterpiece". New editors come with the best of intentions but sometimes get disappointed and frustrated. Exemplo347 often deals with explaining our [[WP:Note|notability guidelines]] to new editors. Explaining why an article is up for deletion requires skill and tact and a concern for retaining the novice editor. As a member of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history|WikiProject Military history]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject India|WikiProject India]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan|WikiProject Pakistan]] he often runs into situations that require help in understanding language and cultural differences. [[Siege of Arrah]] and [[Bengal Native Infantry]] are just two articles that display his careful mainspace editing.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
<pre>{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}</pre>
Thanks again for your efforts! [[User:Lepricavark|Lepricavark]] ([[User talk:Lepricavark|talk]]) 05:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:43, 25 February 2017

Indo-Iranians peoples

Indo-Iranians peoples is compelete and correct and better than Indo-Iranians. similar to : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indo-Aryans&redirect=no

Closure

I appreciate your closure, but to be clear, I was actually referring to the entire thread, now rendered moot by the RfC, of which only two sub-sections are currently closed. It's really a minor point, but since convention allows for closed threads to sit idle on ANI for at least a day to allow for global participation, its a fairly consequential housekeeping matter for lengthy threads. TimothyJosephWood 14:11, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah bugger. That'll teach me for trying to help in a half-assed manner! Exemplo347 (talk) 14:12, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

name of article is incomplete

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Iranians = wrong

  • Indo-Iranians peoples is correct
If you want to rename an article, the correct procedure is to suggest the change on the talk page of the article. Incidentally, "Indo-Iranians peoples" is never correct. Exemplo347 (talk) 14:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

pls see it: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aryanic_languages&redirect=no and :

Please stop. I've told you the correct procedure to follow. Exemplo347 (talk) 14:23, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

can u help me?

can u add Aryanic to article with this source : http://cura.free.fr/xv/14boutet.html - One of its two stars, much like our own Sun, is on the white spectrum while the other is of a yellow-red tinge. Did not Enmerkar, the Sumerian king of Uruk have gifts of silver and gold to offer the Aryan overlord of Chariots? It is therefore possible that these two stars were not as close then as they are now. If one looks closer at the Sumerian legends, one finds many overlapping details with those of the Aryanic peoples. The wild-man of the Gilgamesh cycle for example, bears much resemblance with those found in Scandinavian, Celtic and Vedic myths. This takes us to the imagery found in astrology as well as in I.E. mythology. [16] The Rig Veda, selected, translated and annotated by Wendy Doniger O'Flaherty, 1.160 Vs 1-5, p. 203. « Text

  • thanks
No, as I've said, you should suggest your changes on the Talk page of the article. An experienced editor will then assess your change & make the edit they feel is appropriate. Exemplo347 (talk) 14:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COI Template

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Please do not add COI templates to articles, as you did at The Russian Bride, when no COI has been declared. If the text is neutral, it doesn't belong there at all. If it isn't, edit the text. Lyrda (talk) 15:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The COI template is there because you haven't declared your Conflict of Interest. Until you do, please do not comment on my talk page again. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:53, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Why are you so sure this is a vandal? Looking at the article the only reference has nothing to do with a "Tom Parker". Please reconsider your actions or explain them. BethNaught (talk) 18:04, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@BethNaught: The user is a sock of some sort, imitating TomParker680 (note the very slight difference in user name) simply to delete the article in question. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 18:06, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

see it

hi, see it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan : "Aryan" (/ˈɛəriən, ˈɛərjən, ˈær-/)[1] is a term meaning "noble" which was used as a self-designation by Indian and Iranian or Indo-Iranian people. click on Indo-Iranian people .... go to Indo-Iranians. your criteria for speedy deletion is not neccesary and correct. pls delete it. is it very clear , but i will not keep on but you like to delet a correct link.

Greetings. I believe you are referring to the incorrectly spelled Redirect that I have nominated. Mis-spelled redirects are eligible for speedy deletion. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 19:14, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
thanks . no problem, i dont like keep on argument, thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Callofworld (talkcontribs) 19:27, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply] 

infobox

for add infobox and add map, i dont know how act?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Minorities_in_Turkey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Callofworld (talkcontribs) 13:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Callofworld: Infoboxes are never, ever added to the Talk pages of articles. Please do not do it again. Exemplo347 (talk) 13:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, can u add infobox to this article : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indo-Iranians&oldid=766647898

Maestromanos

I deleted it as A7 rather than hoax, as I didn't consider it 'blatant' (i.e. stand up and spit in your face obvious). However, you might find my post on User talk:BrianKleinman interesting... Peridon (talk) 13:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Peridon: That's fine, I agree it wasn't totally blatant. It sounds like we both did the same kinds of checks! Exemplo347 (talk) 13:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I also had doubts about concealing electrical equipment under the planks at the bottom of a trench. They were to keep the men's feet out of the worst of the mud, and underneath would be water and mud. Not good for the electrics... I did nearly go for blatant over the transmission loops - looping could only have been done manually then - repetition, not actual 'loop'ing. Electric gramophone recording only came in around 1925 (I've got records from before and after, and the difference is incredible), and actual wire and tape for real looping much later still. Recording equipment wouldn't have survived in trench conditions, anyway. There is a chance that this is real and was some oddbod trying things out. No evidence, no article, though. Well spotted, anyway. A lot of patrollers would take it face value. Peridon (talk) 16:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sandboxing.

My page Pink Floyd Records contains no advertising, propaganda or "sandboxing" of any kind. Please stop undoing my page. I apologize for any inconvenience i might have caused. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crimson1216 (talkcontribs) 02:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. Your article was reviewed independently by myself and another editor, and both of us agree that it's not appropriate for inclusion. Please do not recreate your article again in its current format. Use the Article Creation wizard in the future and submit a Draft version of your article for review. Good luck with your future editing. Exemplo347 (talk) 02:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week

Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week for your work with new editors. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Buster7 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

Getting new editors to understand the environment of Wikipedia is not any easy task especially when you have just requested a speedy deletion on their "Masterpiece". New editors come with the best of intentions but sometimes get disappointed and frustrated. Exemplo347 often deals with explaining our notability guidelines to new editors. Explaining why an article is up for deletion requires skill and tact and a concern for retaining the novice editor. As a member of WikiProject Military history, WikiProject India and WikiProject Pakistan he often runs into situations that require help in understanding language and cultural differences. Siege of Arrah and Bengal Native Infantry are just two articles that display his careful mainspace editing.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}

Thanks again for your efforts! Lepricavark (talk) 05:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]