User talk:MoonJet

Welcome

Hello, MoonJet! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! --Kleinzach 07:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Problems with upload of File:Tekken 6 Lili.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tekken 6 Lili.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:08, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. --IllaZilla (talk) 17:35, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:311 Love Song.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:311 Love Song.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Alisa Bosconovitch.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alisa Bosconovitch.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Jade_MK9.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Jade_MK9.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 15:04, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Please assume some good faith

The problem with articles like Elena is that sometimes sources end up overlooked no matter what...but it doesn't help that nobody actually bothers to put those sources up until the article is being merged or they actively care about it. The one you did work into there though did have something of significance to say at least, and fleshing things out did make the reception section better.

Now if we can do the same for Lili I think we'll all be happy. :\--Kung Fu Man (talk) 03:55, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Ling Xiaoyu, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Tekken (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Kenshi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mavado (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Stryker reception

A writer from Anime News Network gives his opinion about Stryker here. Hope it helps. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 00:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Could you upload Sexy Mileena?

Just place it in reception, I'll rewrite everything accordingly.

Various other articles lack pictures altogether, including several MK charas (Jade, Jax, etc). --194.145.185.229 (talk) 17:42, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Also, could you also upload [1] for Taki (Soulcalibur) ("One rejected early design draft sketch for Taki in Soul Edge")? The source is [2]. --194.145.185.229 (talk) 14:56, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Anna Williams Tekken 6.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anna Williams Tekken 6.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:19, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Alisa Bosconovitch.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alisa Bosconovitch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:33, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Christie Monteiro.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Christie Monteiro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:34, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ling Xiaoyu Tekken 6.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ling Xiaoyu Tekken 6.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:35, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Yoshimitsu.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yoshimitsu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:13, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:This is the End of Control cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:This is the End of Control cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Lili Tekken Render.png

Thanks for uploading File:Lili Tekken Render.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Criteria for articles on songs

Your recent edits do not comply with the criteria for articles on individual songs. Please read WP:MUSIC before making more edits that will just have to be undone. 50.131.220.134 (talk) 16:41, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Character redirects

Please join a discussion here Talk:Tekken Tag Tournament 2#Character redirects. Thank you.--Krystaleen 12:24, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Do you care about Darkstalkers characters?

Because I think Hsien-Ko and/or Demitri deserve an article. --Niemti (talk) 00:59, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Mileena

Could you check it for a proper use of the English tenses, and correct any if needed? --Niemti (talk) 08:27, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Also updating is nice, but waatch out to not insert positive stuff randomly into the negative reception paragraphs. --Niemti (talk) 17:26, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

And I know why I had a deja vu, that's because I've already used this list earlier in the article. And speaking of it, I think you might drop by at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines#fC: Top X lists in video games --Niemti (talk) 09:48, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

The issues have been addressed, so you'll need to finish the review. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:18, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alisa Bosconovitch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Comic-Con

Anna Williams (Tekken) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Comic-Con

Lili (Tekken) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Comic-Con

Ling Xiaoyu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Comic-Con

Nina Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Comic-Con

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:10, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Green Day - Kill the DJ cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Green Day - Kill the DJ cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

Thanks for your contributions towards Green Day related articles. I try to do my best but miss few things which other editors like you do and it is greatly appreciated :) TheSpecialUser TSU 01:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stray Heart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Let Yourself Go (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:25, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Powerless - single?

Since you're still undoing edits which remove Powerless from the singles section, I'd like you to post a comment on the talk page. I mean, who says, that Powerless is a single? Actually only iTunes which also released Wretches and Kings and Not Alone as "singles". --Gbuvn (talk) 15:54, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Paramore - Now cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Paramore - Now cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Asuka Kazama

You can help and provide some Rec. --Niemti (talk) 00:26, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ling Xiaoyu.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Ling Xiaoyu.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Tre

The Forgotten (Green Day song) is a redirect: there is no point in inserting it. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:39, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

• BTW, WP:NSONG suggests that a song may be notable if it has charted, but not that it is notable. The reviews you cited pertain to the album or to that soundtrack, not to the song in its own right, which also suggests it may not be independently notable. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 00:43, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

all we know

I had no idea pop punk could be heavy...

Orphaned non-free media (File:Jaycee TTT2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Jaycee TTT2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:21, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Hey

I quoted the source

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sum 41 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [Jon Marshall  – lead vocals, rhythm guitar (1997–1998)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.angelfire.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:48, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anklebiters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hipster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Your recent editing history at Green Day shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. STATic message me! 18:58, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ling Xiaoyu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Schoolgirl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Donkey Kong Country: Tropical Freeze, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sonic the Hedgehog (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hi there. When working on articles, please try to adhere to WP:BRD - you "Boldly" added the info to the article, I Reverted those changes, and so next is to Discuss on the talk page. This is how issues are supposed to be solved, not through continually re-adding it into the article (you've added it 3 times now).

This is actually how we're always supposed to do it, but its even worse when there's clear discussion on the talk page that goes against your edits. Please join in this discussion rather than continually reverting and arguing through edit summaries, and change it only if there's consensus to do so. Thanks! Sergecross73 msg me 20:13, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Its common for bands that either span many genre, or have many disputes on their genre, to list only one genre in the infobox, and then list out a bunch more in the "musical style" section. (See something like Smashing Pumpkins, which does this well, or Breaking Benjamin, which is a bit sloppier/more direct example of it.) Pretty certain that's what we were working towards Shinedown's talk page, because people are continually tinkering with adding removing all sorts of genre, some more right/wrong than others. That's why we're telling you to talk it out on the discussion page. Two editors object to your changes, so its definitely necessary to discuss. Sergecross73 msg me 19:03, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Look, any time there's anything in contention, you discuss it, so stop complaining about how there's nothing to talk about. Wikipedia is a combination of what reliable sources say and what consensus dictates - its a two part, joint thing. You've only got one of those under wraps. Thus, there's something to discuss.

That being said, maybe you could have a point. But bring it to the article's talk page, so there can be discussion between more people than just me and you. Also, focus more on why exactly its so important that alt metal is included. Like I said, maybe you have a point, but you still really haven't even explained why, you just keep on giving "why not?" arguments. Sergecross73 msg me 20:13, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ling Xiaoyu

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ling Xiaoyu you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix (talk) 15:00, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ling Xiaoyu

The article Ling Xiaoyu you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Ling Xiaoyu for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix (talk) 16:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

TekkenJinKazama sock

That's almost certainly a TJK sock you identified. I commented on the SPI report. The odd Tekken and Bollywood combination of interests is a dead giveaway. I've requested semi-protection for some of his most common targets, including the Feng Wei article. Ravensfire (talk) 13:03, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Re: Hey there

Yeah, I particularly hate how fickle WP:VG's opinions on notability seem to be because that keeps us from setting precedents. I mean, hell, even if an article I've poured my very being into gets redirected, I want to at least be able to keep a very clear bijective standard that can be referenced later because of it, i.e. "If you have this, this, and this, it's notable. If you don't, it isn't." With as little ambiguity as possible.

Regardless, thanks for keeping an eye on the discussions. I don't edit music articles as much as I have, but I can still check that out later. Tezero (talk) 22:53, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

I don't notice anything major other than some short paragraphs in Background through Singles. Tezero (talk) 17:15, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Re: GA review

I'll try to take a look at some point. I'd recommend making sure you have a good sense of the GA criteria before reviewing Underground, though. Tezero (talk) 02:57, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Underground is at GAN now. If you think you're ready to review it, go ahead, and if you don't, don't. It's your call. Tezero (talk) 22:21, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! Yeah, the Tony Hawk series is overlooked among WP:VG considering how popular it is outside (which was actually a lot of why I got into Sonic, Digimon, and Lego Star Wars II here), and Underground is likely my favorite game of all time, so I had immense motivation to work. Actually, since these discussions I'm waiting on aren't going anywhere at the moment, I may pick up another hopeful GA. Tezero (talk) 02:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

I own Pro Skater 1, 3, and HD and American Wasteland as well as Underground, but I too largely hopped off the train at Proving Ground (which I sold, in late '08 or so) because of the abysmal Wii controls. I'd like to try the others sometime, but as for actually buying the ones with peripherals, I don't think so.

Anyway, it disappoints me, but the more general discussions aren't going anywhere; I bang my head proverbially against the wall every time someone says "just look at the GNG". As for the specifics, it looks like Shadow and Rouge are staying, Big will probably close as no consensus (maybe merge), and Silver's as good as gone. But yes, I still will be leaving for a while as soon as the discussions I'm involved in all close - at least a week, maybe much longer. Tezero (talk) 19:08, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, it's too bad, really; it just teaches the project that the rest of Wikipedia doesn't care what it does - which frustrates me specifically because it encourages them to keep up double standards and such. I guess there's nothing I can do without drawing anger for not just "letting it die", though. So it goes.

Anyway, I hadn't looked since you first asked me, but I think I'll take up the GA review. I see a couple of minor issues, but nothing too serious yet. Tezero (talk) 19:34, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Please try to contribute, then. czar's starting to act like it's me alone wasting everyone else's time, and maybe you'll come up with powerful arguments I haven't. Oh, and I'll take a look at Paramore now. Tezero (talk) 23:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Would it be appropriate for me to pass the GAN if the other reviewer who jumped in hasn't given approval? Tezero (talk) 22:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

That's fine. I'll pass it if he hasn't responded to your ping or mine by tomorrow. Tezero (talk) 00:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Whoops!

Re this: [3] -- I'm an idiot! Thanks for the explanation. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paramore (album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Paramore (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tezero -- Tezero (talk) 20:01, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paramore (album)

The article Paramore (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Paramore (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tezero -- Tezero (talk) 20:21, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

The Hunting Party

[4] —Dark 03:47, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

The Hunting Party release date

Please see the discussion page of The Hunting Party. I'd like to resolve this issue so that information is consistent with other sources. --Jimv1983 (talk) 20:55, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Genre war...

We shouldn't start an edit war over those genres. But the fact is that pop rock is the only genre included in the sheet music, all the other genres are opinions of the critics. However, if you do insist in including them, just add new jack swing, which is missing. — prism △ 15:45, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

American Idiot Parental Advisory

I really dont understand how saying and proving that the Green Day album American Idiot has a parental advisory label should be removed for the reason of being "Trivial"

Im not blind man! I can see the sticker on the the back of the album right here! I can here them say the F word multiple times on the album. Please explain the "trivial" part about that because im obviously missing something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonic4fan (talk • contribs) 17:26, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Soliciting comment...

Hi! Would you care to review my FA nomination for the article Of Human Feelings? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman, and the criteria for FA articles is at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 23:53, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Re: GA Review 2: Wolf Quest

I'll take you up on your offer from earlier. Since no one else has, would you mind reviewing Tony Hawk's Underground? (Or Sonic X, for that matter.) Tezero (talk) 00:34, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

That's fine; I understand if you were busy. Sonic X still doesn't have anyone, but... again, if you're still busy with other stuff, that's okay. Tezero (talk) 03:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Still Into You may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• <ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OblL026SvD4 |title=Paramore: Still Into You [OFFICIAL VIDEO |publisher=YouTube |date=2013-04-08 |accessdate=2014-06-28}}</ref> The video

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Paramore (album)

Gatoclass (talk) 18:44, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Unapologetic

There is a discussion regarding genres in the infobox for the article Unapologetic. You are welcome to weigh in. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 17:53, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Weezer

Sure man, you can have "Back to the Shack"! I'll gladly help you with that one, if you like. And yeah, I was planning on making EWBAITE a good article later on too. -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 22:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Back to the Shack

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Back to the Shack you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CyrockingSmiler -- CyrockingSmiler (talk) 19:02, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Powerless

I'm really confused. Because iTunes says that the song is released as a single. Then why is it promotional single in the article. Please tell me the reason behind this. Thank you. Mike:Golu · ^{[ Confidential message ]} 05:32, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Back to the Shack

The article Back to the Shack you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Back to the Shack for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CyrockingSmiler -- CyrockingSmiler (talk) 11:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Living Things (Acapellas and Instrumentals) + The Hunting Party (Acapellas + Instrumentals)

Thank you for changing things for the acapella and instrumental versions of Living Things and The Hunting Party, as it is a digital downloadable album, not a studio album, even though it was recorded at NRG Studios. If anybody changes those two as Studio Albums, keep reverting them. You are doing great with it. Keep it up. Skylar3214 2:46, 24 August 2014

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lonely Girl (Weezer song)

added a link pointing to Cleopatra (song)

The British Are Coming (song)

added a link pointing to Cleopatra (song)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

My Name is Jonas

Hi. I've nominated My Name is Jonas for deletion for a second time, as the previous discussion didn't get enough comments to find a consensus. You're invited to go and make your case for keeping the article again - it's totally possible I'm wrong on this, as ever. Popcornduff (talk) 18:23, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

To be honest - I'm less certain of my nomination this time, I think there's a chance the article is worth keeping; but I'm a big fan of getting rid of anything Wikipedia doesn't need, so I'd like to get a consensus to just make sure. Popcornduff (talk) 00:49, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hate to See Your Heart Break (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Joy Williams

Paramore (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Joy Williams

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sektor.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sektor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 12:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cyrax.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cyrax.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:58, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:36, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Next time take it to WP:RFPP. Right now I've fully protected it for a week so that it will need to be discussed on the talk page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Still Into You

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Still Into You you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 12:40, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Still Into You

The article Still Into You you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Still Into You for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 07:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Still Into You

The article Still Into You you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Still Into You for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 14:41, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk Back

Hello, MoonJet. You have new messages at Yash!'s talk page.
Message added 02:47, 24 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Yash! 02:47, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk Back

Hello, MoonJet. You have new messages at Yash!'s talk page.
Message added 02:35, 25 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Yash! 02:35, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Theme and composition

Thanks for the edits! English is not really my forte. I cannot figure out how to mention something about that section in the lead except for the Dookie and Insomniac relevance. A sentence briefing about the theme is required. Perhaps can you help? Yash! 13:34, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

That should do it. Thank you Kokoro20! — Yash! ^[talk] 01:10, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

A request for advice and/or help

Would you agree that this song has way too many references for nu metal? I think you would. Anyway, which ones should I trim off and which ones should I keep? I'm trying to think about how to have both genres fit neatly in one line. DannyMusicEditor (talk) 19:10, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Re:Jimmy Eat World

Hello. I don't actually have any plans on taking any articles to GA at the moment (the 'to-do' list on my talk is around a year old). That being said, I do love Clarity (and JEW) and I wouldn't be against taking it (and the other JEW albums) to GA. Yeepsi (talk) 22:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Hunting Party (album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Hunting Party (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yash! -- Yash! (talk) 21:21, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jin Tekken 6 BR.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jin Tekken 6 BR.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Hunting Party (album)

The article The Hunting Party (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Hunting Party (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yash! -- Yash! (talk) 02:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

GA nomination

May I ask for a little help, friend?

I assume it was you who nominated the Hunting Party for GA, right? Can you tell me how to do that? I know a particular article that just might classify. DannyMusicEditor (talk) 17:42, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

FAC comments

Hey Kokoro, I've recently nominated Kill 'Em All for featured article. You may leave comments/vote at the nomination page. Appreciate your time.--Retrohead (talk) 10:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

pending changes reviewer

Hi - instead of semi-protecting the Simple Plan song you requested at RFPP, I put pending changes on it because it's not that heavily edited. I see you don't have the reviewer user right; if you'd like that granted to you, I've reviewed your contributions and I feel comfortable granting it to you. If you'd like me to do that, let me know. If not, just ignore this message. :-) KrakatoaKatie 21:51, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. KrakatoaKatie 23:31, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paramore (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idolator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Editor of the Week

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week for your long-term efforts to help new editors. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

Editor Yash! submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I am pleased to nominate Kokoro20 to be Editor of the Week. Kokoro20 has been editing Wikipedia since December of 2007, though his active contributions began only after April, 2011. So they have been working majorly during the last four years with their edits focusing on punk rock and alternative rock articles. Despite having a low edit count, they have helped promote at least three GAs and have been silently contributing to a great many other GAs. Their work focuses on updating and keeping the facts right on a vast number of articles. It looks simple, but it really isn't if you do that to as many articles as Kokoro20 has been doing for this span of years. As far as I see, they have never been awarded a barnstar so let's not make all that work go unappreciated.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}

Thanks again for your efforts! . Buster Seven Talk 14:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)