User talk:CodeLyoko

User:TheMesquito/alltitle

Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

Why?

Why was I banned? Wackslas - Holler at me (talk) 16:54, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Pure Logic doesn't require a citation.

My statement was (paraphrasing myself) that "Theoretically, Many parents may assume their child is unique and special, or seek special status for their child, thereby assigning the title "Indigo" to their child because they love their child. Thus, it is logical (and follows) that this process of applying a unique identifying title to a child makes it more difficult to study the phenomenon of Indigo children. Since the phenomenon is self-reported, and many parents (and self-identifiers) see it as a badge of uniqueness, it stands to reason the difficulty in studying the phenomenon may be due to skewed self-reporting. Thus, the assumption that "Indigo" has no validity is biased because it has not considered the difficulties associated with studying the phenomenon."

THIS DOES NOT REQUIRE A CITATION.

NEVER DELETE MY EDITS AGAIN!

E V E R! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.84.240.118 (talk) 19:42, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your edit to that article, although it might be logical, does not mean that it was not opinionated and it still requires a source and, even if it had a source, would still be removed due to it being opinionated. Thanks, TheMesquito^buzz 04:23, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Request for ACC access

Thank you for your interest in ACC, during the normal checks for access requirements, I noticed you have not provided identification. This requirement is mandatory. If you still wish to help please submit you identification, and once logged at Identification noticeboard just poke an ACC Admin to continue with registration, no need to re-apply your current request will be re-activated. Hope to hear from you soon and again thank you for your interest. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I know. I submited my proof last night and am now just waiting on someone from the WMF to add me. Thanks for the message! TheMesquito^buzz 18:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Great, no problem. give us a poke once you're posted on the board. Cheers, Mlpearc (open channel) 18:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done @Mlpearc: Done here by Jalexander-WMF. Thanks, TheMesquito^buzz 23:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Also pinging, @Stwalkerster: and @FastLizard4: TheMesquito^buzz 01:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

TheMesquito, thank you for interest in the account creation process. I have verified your Identification [1] and I have approved your request, welcome to the team. You may now access the interface here. Before you do so, please read the account creation guide and our username policy thoroughly to familiarize yourself with the process. You should also join us on IRC #wikipedia-en-accounts ^connect where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and to get any advice on requests as well as the mailing list. Please note that we have implemented a policy of zero tolerance on mishandled requests, and that failure to assess correctly will result in suspension. I would like to emphasize that it is not a race to complete a request, and each one should be handled diligently and thoroughly. Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day, although you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked "Account Creator Needed" by the bot and "Flagged user needed" on the interface. However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:PERM/ACC. Please keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse will result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome! Mlpearc (open channel) 02:28, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Agreement

I, TheMesquito, do agree to the ACC guide, as listed here Wikipedia:Request an account/Guide . Thanks, TheMesquito^buzz 02:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

User PavelStaykov

The User PavelStaykov (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is not willing anyhow to understand what other editors are telling him, nor is willing to constructivelly edit or join the discussion. He continues with such behavior even after my final warning and I'm not willing to act as a bad guy and report him to the incidents noticeboard. Could you join the discussion at his talk page, or see by yourself what can be done? I contacted you as previously in March you already warned him at the talk page. (Besides, was the my (or by editors in general) use of warnings acceptable and recommended?)--Crovata (talk) 00:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheMesquito was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:TheMesquito/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheMesquito^buzz 17:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Editor of the Week

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week for getting things right. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Lixxx235 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I pinky swear I'll stop nominating the flood of people that I have been recently... after I nominate TheMesquito :P. TheMesquito (talk · contribs · count · logs) is an incredibly hardworking member of this community. With just under 4000 edits, he may not have the highest edit count, but he puts so much effort into each edit and spends time to make sure he gets it right. TheMesquito is a Huggler, and he's not always the fastest, his reverts are all high-quality and assume good faith while not missing vandalism. He reviews AFCs, participates in discussions, and promptly and civilly responds on his talk page, and is a wonderful person to converse with. TheMesquito truly is one of Wikipedia's unsung great editors.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}

Thanks again for your efforts! Go Phightins! 20:27, 3 May 2015 (UTC)