User talk:Pyrotec: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs)
Line 77: Line 77:
</div>
</div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0691 -->
<!-- EdwardsBot 0691 -->

== Editor of the Week ==

{| style="border: 2px solid lightgray; background-color: #fafafa" color:#aaa"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[File:Editor of the week barnstar.svg|100px]]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color:#606570" |'''Editor of the Week'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid lightgray" |Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]], for outstanding content work, specifically related to good article reviews. Thank you for the great contributions! <span style="color:#a0a2a5">(courtesy of the [[WP:WER|<span style="color:#80c0ff">Wikipedia Editor Retention Project</span>]])</span>
|}
[[User:Khazar2]] submitted the following nomination for [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]]:
:While Pyrotec's content contributions would be impressive in themselves--including 2 FAs and 10 GAs--this user's most impressive work has been in GA reviews. She/he has the distinction of being one of the three most prolific reviewers in the history of the Good Articles project, having reviewed an astonishing 501 nominations on topics ranging from [[Dick Turpin]] to "[[Amazing Grace]]" to the [[International System of Units]]. In an area of the project that's perpetually backlogged, Pyrotec is a refreshing example of an editor who's always willing to pitch in to critique, improve, and promote the work of others. She/he deserves to be recognized for this multi-year contribution to keeping this project running.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
<pre>{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}</pre>
Thanks again for your efforts! '''[[User:Go Phightins!|<font color="blue">Go</font>]] [[User talk:Go Phightins!|<font color="#E90004">''Phightins''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Go Phightins!|<font color="#008504">!</font>]]''' 03:24, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:24, 20 January 2014

Good Article Nominations Request For Comment

A 'Request For Comment' for Good Article Nominations is currently being held. We are asking that you please take five to ten minutes to review all seven proposals that will affect Good Article Nominations if approved. Full details of each proposal can be found here. Please comment on each proposal (or as many as you can) here.

At this time, Proposal 1, 3, and 5 have received full (or close to) support.

If you have questions of anything general (not related to one specif proposal), please leave a message under the General discussion thread.

Please note that Proposal 2 has been withdrawn and no further comments are needed. Also, please disregard Proposal 9 as it was never an actual proposal.

Widerøe Flight 933

I have fixed the issues per the GAN at Widerøe Flight 933. Should your itinerary allow it, send me an e-mail and I'd be more than happy to give you a tour of the historic sites of Bergen. Arsenikk (talk) 23:05, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GAN December 2013 Backlog Drive

Hello! Just a friendly reminder that the GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on December 31, 2013!

If you know anyone outside of the WikiProject that may be interested, feel free to invite them to the drive!

If you have any questions or want to comment about something regarding the drive, post them here--EdwardsBot (talk) 00:08, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:25, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week

Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week, for outstanding content work, specifically related to good article reviews. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Khazar2 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

While Pyrotec's content contributions would be impressive in themselves--including 2 FAs and 10 GAs--this user's most impressive work has been in GA reviews. She/he has the distinction of being one of the three most prolific reviewers in the history of the Good Articles project, having reviewed an astonishing 501 nominations on topics ranging from Dick Turpin to "Amazing Grace" to the International System of Units. In an area of the project that's perpetually backlogged, Pyrotec is a refreshing example of an editor who's always willing to pitch in to critique, improve, and promote the work of others. She/he deserves to be recognized for this multi-year contribution to keeping this project running.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}

Thanks again for your efforts! Go Phightins! 03:24, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]