User talk:Bleaney: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 91: Line 91:
| data6 = '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Nominations|Nomination page]]'''
| data6 = '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Nominations|Nomination page]]'''
}}
}}

{{clear}}


*You are just the kind of editor we were thinking of when we founded this project a few months ago. Congratulations, and keep up your fantastic work! [[User: Go Phightins!|<span style="color:blue">'''Go'''</span>]] [[User talk:Go Phightins!|<span style="color:#E90004">'''''Phightins'''''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Go_Phightins!|<span style="color:#008504">'''!'''</span>]] 21:21, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
*You are just the kind of editor we were thinking of when we founded this project a few months ago. Congratulations, and keep up your fantastic work! [[User: Go Phightins!|<span style="color:blue">'''Go'''</span>]] [[User talk:Go Phightins!|<span style="color:#E90004">'''''Phightins'''''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Go_Phightins!|<span style="color:#008504">'''!'''</span>]] 21:21, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:41, 12 March 2013

PROD templates

Please be advised that Proposed deletion templates, unlike other deletion templates, can be removed by anyone for any reason. What happens next if the deletion rationale is not addressed is that the article gets submitted to Articles for deletion. -- Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 01:07, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oasis Academy :Shirley Park

Oasis Academy :Shirley Park is the name used by the organization, including signage, letters ect. It is therefor the name the artical should use. 82.43.51.8 (talk) 02:30, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oasis Academy

Hello, Bleaney. You have new messages at [[Talk:Oasis Academy Shirley Park#[Section title]|Talk:Oasis Academy Shirley Park]].
Message added 19:35, 9 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Bump... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atban3000 (talkcontribs) 19:45, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Where can I access ofsted entries? Atban.3000 write me 19:51, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That appears to be the webpage software, it would not display the colon if it was/is there. However as the 'about us' page has also indicated, I think it can stay the same. Atban.3000 write me 20:01, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
So am I :) - On a related note, would you say then that the Wintringham artical should be set the same way?... Atban.3000 write me 20:07, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It appears to have a redirect in place on that page, so I'm putting in a Requested Move on the WP:RM page. Atban.3000 write me 20:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your lead reversion at Jill Marsden (EastEnders)

Paul MacDermott requested a copyedit for this article in November on the GOCE requests page (we have a backlog). Although it's a GA, the prose needs a fair amount of work; the plot summaries, in particular, are overly detailed and give the article a crufty appearance. My incremental changes in the lead were reverted by you using Twinkle with the summary, "Reverted to revision 530700223 by ZippyGirl: Present tense is used for fiction (TW))".

I know that present tense is used for fiction (although this can indicate an in-universe style, which is discouraged); however, none of my edits changed present tense to past. WP:MASSRV states, "...revert a good faith edit only after careful consideration". Reverting is primarily intended to deal with vandalism. All the best, Miniapolis 23:25, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Secondary schools in Sandwell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hill Top (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greek museums

Yes, I have the list in my watchlist and keep monitoring your edits. You are doing a great job and I am collecting the articles you are adding in a user page to give them a round of checks. I already see a few candidates for AfD and several for notability tags. Thank you. Hoverfish Talk 21:05, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joining Wikiproject

How may I join the WikiProject for EastEnders? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mercyme22 (talkcontribs) 22:24, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Huguenot

This is regarding the section Exodus/England on the Wikipedia page, Huguenot. My interest and area of expertise is lace, lacemaking and its history, and on 16 September 2012 I made a change to the Huguenot page, replacing the part-sentence "Huguenots greatly contributed to the development of lace-making in Bedfordshire" by "It is often asserted that the Huguenots contributed to the development of lace-making in this area, but there is no historical evidence to support this."
If I understand the page history correctly, you reverted this, with the explanation, "There are references you just ignore them!." As someone new to Wikipedia editing at the time, I did not know how to respond, but I now gather that I should attempt to resolve this dispute by starting a discussion on your talk page. This I am now doing.

Could you please be specific about the "references" you say that I am ignoring. I can see no numbered references associated with the sentence I replaced. Are they somewhere else on the page? If there is sound historical evidence to support this then I am clearly wrong and the page should include these references. However I think we have an obligation to discuss the validity of any references to ensure that they are not just repetition of unsupported statements from books such as "The Romance of the Lace Pillow" (Thomas Wright). --Socialambulator (talk) 20:17, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reference you posted on my talk page, but I think that the pertinent material in this does not represent local historical research from the museum, but is drawn entirely from the Thomas Wright book I mentioned. I'm not sure that you saw my proposal to unify this discussion, but I have gone ahead and transferred it to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Huguenot. I explain there my reasons for thinking that book is the source, and suggest that if this is agreed we can discuss it and the 19th century books which are the source for most later statements on this subject. --Socialambulator (talk) 10:50, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well spotted. What drew your attention to it? It annoys me when hoaxes linger for years, while people tidy the article up and correct the spelling, but never think to check whether there is any substance to it. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:33, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of EastEnders characters (2004), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grant Mitchell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week

Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week, for creation of over 1200 articles, mostly related to Oregon. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Horologium submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

Bleaney (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has been quietly fixing all sorts of articles relating to schools; he has de-orphaned articles, added wikilinks where appropriate, created redirects, added categories, and created an array of useful templates. And that's just one of the several areas in which he is active; he's also been busy creating and expanding articles in Bedfordshire, creating articles on historic buildings worldwide, and started almost 60 articles on British prisons. He has amassed over 45,000 edits, and outside of a couple of barnstars in 2010 and 2011, doesn't seem to be getting much in the way of recognition for all of his work. Horologium (talk) 05:11, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}

Thanks again for your efforts! ```Buster Seven Talk 05:59, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PROJECT EDITOR RETENTION
Editor of  the Week
Bleaney is a member of WikiProject Bedfordshire
Bleaney
Editor of the Week
for the week beginning March 10, 2013
Starting his Wikipedia career in February 2007, Bleaney's 48 thousand edits put him in the top 1000 Wikipedians of all time by number of edits. He is one of Wikipedia's fine under-the-radar contributers, with over 75% of the edits being in the article space. His contributions have been in a large variety of areas: Doing cleanup maintenance on school-related articles, creating and expanding articles on Bedfordshire and on historic buildings around the world, and starting articles on British prisons. Bleaney has been an invaluable asset to Wikipedia through his excellent work.
Recognized forContributions on articles in all spheres, including schools, historic buildings and British prisons
Notable work(s) Bedfordshire
Nomination page
  • You are just the kind of editor we were thinking of when we founded this project a few months ago. Congratulations, and keep up your fantastic work! Go Phightins! 21:21, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for your great contributions throughout Wikipedia! You deserve this award! (Did we mention that you can display that cool box to the right on all your pages to display your achievement? :) ) TheOriginalSoni (talk) 06:39, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]