User talk:TenPoundHammer: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
JohnCD (talk | contribs)
Line 160: Line 160:


I think you have been too hasty closing the AfD on [[Enectali Figueroa]]. My nomination was in good faith, and I expected to have some debate. I presented evidence that his h-index failed [[WP:PROF]], and that he was not the pioneer of the type of sensor clamed in the article. As "Enectali Figueroa" he has three Google News hits, none of which say much, and as "Figueroa-Feliciano", none. The wave of Keeps was to be expected when the AfD was listed at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Puerto Rico]], but aside from David Shankbone we did not hear from the Wikipedia community-at-large. Also, there was a not-vote for deletion on the Talk Page of the article that predated the AfD, indicating that somebody besides me thought this article was questionable. Thank you, [[User:Joey the Mango|Joey the Mango]] ([[User talk:Joey the Mango|talk]]) 18:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
I think you have been too hasty closing the AfD on [[Enectali Figueroa]]. My nomination was in good faith, and I expected to have some debate. I presented evidence that his h-index failed [[WP:PROF]], and that he was not the pioneer of the type of sensor clamed in the article. As "Enectali Figueroa" he has three Google News hits, none of which say much, and as "Figueroa-Feliciano", none. The wave of Keeps was to be expected when the AfD was listed at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Puerto Rico]], but aside from David Shankbone we did not hear from the Wikipedia community-at-large. Also, there was a not-vote for deletion on the Talk Page of the article that predated the AfD, indicating that somebody besides me thought this article was questionable. Thank you, [[User:Joey the Mango|Joey the Mango]] ([[User talk:Joey the Mango|talk]]) 18:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

== Forthcoming band article ==

I know you despair at the contentless "forthcoming album" articles we get: how's this for the entire content of a "forthcoming band" article which was speedied this afternoon:
<blockquote>
'''The Sound Of Perseverance''' is an uncreated Progressive Metal band from Monroe, Louisiana. They hope to find members and write songs in the future, but the actual formation of the band could be unsuccessful.''(the name may change in time as well.)''
</blockquote>
We maybe need a corollary to [[WP:HAMMER]] to say that if a band hasn't finished recruiting its article is unlikely to survive. Regards, [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 21:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:01, 3 June 2009

Template:Archive box collapsible NEW MESSAGES GO TO THE BOTTOM.

Click here to leave me a message.

Hello. I strongly urge you to avoid stuff like "slobbering fanboy" in these discussions. Please focus on the articles and not readers/editors. Also, given the existence of a ride of the same name at multiple amusement parks, I think a valid case could/should at least be made for a redirect in at least this one's case. Best, --A NobodyMy talk 00:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I warned him about using that term, it might be accurate to some extent but it's not for someone of some kind of repute to be saying, dilettante idiots like me might get away with it but not you. Sometimes I wonder if Cheyenne shouldn't be circling closer to home, can't be having a bat of clues without knowing what clues the bat dispenses... or something. treelo radda 00:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Cheyenne's too busy clue-batting others to clue-bat me. Maybe I need a second clue-bat? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 00:47, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think so, six otters and only one bat seems a bit unfair. Anyway, you do seem to need it given now your stand for el presidénte admin has been kicked way back to 2010 now and likely to creep to 2011 then never. treelo radda 09:24, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes

On userboxes, is there a way to find images that are legal to use? I did notice images on three of my userboxes disappearing, and was wondering if i should find some images on my own, and uploading them onto the userbox, and of course put the right type of copyright license. Ryanbstevens (talk) 00:58, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • One more question. What was wrong with those images that i had put in there before they were removed? Ryanbstevens (talk) 01:04, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why on AfD disscussions, you alawys type WP:WHYCANTMADEUPCRAPLIKETHISBEDELETED? In fact that page (Wikipedia:Why can't madeup crap like this be deleted) does not exist. The Junk Police (reports|works) 01:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rayeselected.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Rayeselected.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:44, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your otters have been naughty

... and so now are proud parents of adorable baby otters!!! Congrats! Benders Game 18:38, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I see here about your weary complaint. There are some of us who care for you, but not retail stiores. LOL. Bearian (talk) 20:43, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nobody will help me destroy oddly formed fanwank lists but you don't see me over-using <big> tags like a kid with a new word. treelo radda 21:22, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For the Love (Tracy Lawrence album)

I have put up all of the songwriters for every song on Tracy Lawrence's For the Love album. The only two songs that I did not put the songwriters on were the B-Sides, for which I do not know who wrote those. --Tristinarocks (talk) 18:44, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Aldean concert

I'm in Pikeville, Kentucky right now, and i'm going to go see Jason Aldean at the Expo Center tonight. If i manage to get a picture of him, would it be appropriate for use on Wikipedia? (By the way, thanks for the happy birthday message. It really means a lot.) Ryanbstevens (talk) 22:03, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, just license it correctly and that'll be great. Come to me if you need help with licensing, this goober knows little about licenses. treelo radda 22:07, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pinch hitting for me, Treelo. I was out of town most of yesterday. Yeah, that would definitely be acceptable. Just tell me when you've uploaded the image and I'll help you pick a license. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 13:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Or not. treelo radda 13:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Oak Ridge Boys albums

Should the "The" be included? The reason I didn't include it on The Boys Are Back (Oak Ridge Boys album) was because I noticed that all the other Oak Ridge Boys albums were formated without the "The" [1]. --Lost Fugitive (talk) 23:50, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is for not putting the AFD tag on the other bundled articles...

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

--Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re-adding speedy tags already removed

Regarding this: Did you not notice this? Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 17:21, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please check an article's history before you add a speedy tag. You never know what you might find. In the past, I have found previous revisions that asserted notability when the current version did not. Also, if you disagree with an admin's assessment, re-adding a speedy tag can be viewed as admin-shopping. Not a good idea. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 17:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hillary Scott

Please see Talk:Hillary Scott (country music artist) Corpx (talk) 17:48, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deana Carter

I disagree, because even though it peaked low, there's enough to be said about it, in my opinion. Expanded her actual artist page is a great idea, but you can't expand it with information on a song. Besides, "Angels Working Overtime" wasn't a stub - it was quite full of info. I'll try to find some sources. CloversMallRat (talk) 20:33, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to let you know I went ahead and expanded Deana Carter's arist page =) It is now relatively long and contains much more detail CloversMallRat (talk) 06:15, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'd rather it be in its own, seperate page where it belongs. The song didn't peak as high as some of her others, but compare the length in that article to her No. 1 hit "We Danced Anyway" - it really is suitable for a page, despite the lower peak. CloversMallRat (talk) 16:57, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-charting singles

Non-charting singles aren't listed in the Whitburn book, unfortunately. The best places to verify them are LP Discography or Rocky 52. Eric444 (talk) 11:15, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question re Number one singles in Canada category

Since you were the nominator for this category deletion, I just wanted to check in with you for a question. I've moved a few of the constituents to the correct category per the split. However, as I've been going, I noticed that there are sub-categories here as well, including the three to which the individual articles are being moved. Did you have thoughts about where the sub-categories should be moved, or were you less interested in deleting the category itself than you were in just making sure everything was sub-categorized? Mlaffs (talk) 18:13, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Mlaffs's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DRV

I have challenged the CfD of :Category:Fast Folk artists, which you nominated again for deletion last month, at WP:DRV. Chubbles (talk) 02:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I began working on this one. Its gonna be a strong keeper. Sure the original author did nothing but start one sentence with some poor referencing... but the lady's film get some very decent coverage. I'll have no problem pushing this over the GNG bar. Its already looking better and will be great by the time I am through. Trust me. eFilm Critic, Rift Magazine, Minnesota Public Radio 1, Cannes, Variety, San Francisco Examiner, Sundance Channel, Minnesota Stories, Minnesota Daily 1, Minnisota Daily 2, Wisconsin Public Television 1, Wisconsin Public television 2, Chicago Doc Festival, Minnesota Public Radio 2, Minnesota Public Radio 3, WCCO, CUFF, EDU Filmfest, MinnPost, CITWF, Minnesota Council of Foundations, Indie Wire, Hollywood Bitchslap, IFP Minnesota, Newslab, TCUEC... and a whole lot more. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

afd

thank you for offering to help, I think I fixed it

the afd script doesn't work I've noticed (loss of session data)Thisglad (talk) 16:49, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Home (Michael Bublé song)

May I ask what's wrong with my formatting of this article? I think that it makes more sense to have an intro that summarizes all three versions, a section for Bublé's version, a section for Westlife's and a section for Shelton's. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 17:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's simply not how it works. The song is not an independent entity. It is owned and copyrighted by the original artist, and other artists pay/ask to sing their interpretation of the original. It is Wikipedia convention to mention the original version first, then separate additional versions later in the article. I also think this version is best. See "Jai Ho", "Against All Odds", "Without You", "Ain't No Mountain High Enough", "Open Arms", and basically every other song that has been resung. As, such, I'll revert your edit to the Buble's version. Orane (talk) 23:04, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you feel strongly about this, you may wish to bring up the issue at WP:Wikiproject Music. Orane (talk) 23:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Told otherwise by who? That's how I've always known it to be. Orane (talk) 23:09, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Country music

♫ "...and then I lost my mind" ♪ — Twas Now ( talkcontribse-mail ) 00:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deana Carter

So if you don't want to use the term, "sophomore slump" (which makes sense to me, being as its used in reviews and what not), then you should provide an alternative. Please feel free to change it to something else when you edit it next time. CloversMallRat (talk) 00:52, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Music Barnstar
For your outstanding and almost single-handed dedication to creating country music articles in Wikipedia, I award you the Music Barnstar. Congratulations! Chris (talk) 12:08, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TPH, I noticed that you had put a headah template on this article. It was a victim of some vandalism that got away from us, so the first section header was removed. I solved it by going way back, to an early-May version, just to be safe, so that removed your template. Thanks, if you hadn't had done that, the bad version would've continued. So you helped me catch it! This article gets a moderate level of vandalism, so no administrator thinks it's bad enough to need protection, so this happens from time to time. And it seems to get the most juvenile of vandalism, too. Thanks again. --Christine (talk) 14:09, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Figureskatingfan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Christine (talk) 17:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

@Skaterthealmighty:

Zim

Yes, I'll help you with Zim! I know a source that may state more about Zim, BTW. A book by Jerry Beck, Not Just Cartoons: Nicktoons!, may have some info on it. WhisperToMe (talk) 17:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Admin snow closure?

I think you have been too hasty closing the AfD on Enectali Figueroa. My nomination was in good faith, and I expected to have some debate. I presented evidence that his h-index failed WP:PROF, and that he was not the pioneer of the type of sensor clamed in the article. As "Enectali Figueroa" he has three Google News hits, none of which say much, and as "Figueroa-Feliciano", none. The wave of Keeps was to be expected when the AfD was listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Puerto Rico, but aside from David Shankbone we did not hear from the Wikipedia community-at-large. Also, there was a not-vote for deletion on the Talk Page of the article that predated the AfD, indicating that somebody besides me thought this article was questionable. Thank you, Joey the Mango (talk) 18:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Forthcoming band article

I know you despair at the contentless "forthcoming album" articles we get: how's this for the entire content of a "forthcoming band" article which was speedied this afternoon:

The Sound Of Perseverance is an uncreated Progressive Metal band from Monroe, Louisiana. They hope to find members and write songs in the future, but the actual formation of the band could be unsuccessful.(the name may change in time as well.)

We maybe need a corollary to WP:HAMMER to say that if a band hasn't finished recruiting its article is unlikely to survive. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]