User talk:I would be bias if it was allowed: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Warning: Edit warring on Australian Labor Party.
Line 26: Line 26:
:::Just stop using it. [[User:HiLo48|HiLo48]] ([[User talk:HiLo48|talk]]) 07:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
:::Just stop using it. [[User:HiLo48|HiLo48]] ([[User talk:HiLo48|talk]]) 07:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
::::I'm not logged in rn as I'm accessibg from phone Gmail but how the hell you do it? Where do I find it [[Special:Contributions/120.21.234.249|120.21.234.249]] ([[User talk:120.21.234.249|talk]]) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
::::I'm not logged in rn as I'm accessibg from phone Gmail but how the hell you do it? Where do I find it [[Special:Contributions/120.21.234.249|120.21.234.249]] ([[User talk:120.21.234.249|talk]]) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

== May 2024 ==


[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hi I would be bias if it was allowed! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of [[:Australian Labor Party]] several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring policy]] disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article [[Help:Talk pages|talk pages]] to try to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Through discussion|consensus]]. If you are unable to agree&#32;at [[{{TALKPAGENAME:Australian Labor Party}}]], please use one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests|dispute resolution options]] to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ''[[User:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b>]]''<sup>[[User talk:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b>]]</sup> 07:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:42, 12 May 2024

Welcome!

A plate of chocolate chip cookies.
Welcome!

Hello, I would be bias if it was allowed, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 10:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar advice

OK, that was the formal, template driven welcome above, but this is a piece of direct personal advice. Your username really is a bad one. No doubt you're trying to be clever. That can sometimes work, but on a fairly serious site like Wikipedia, I wouldn't recommend it. More importantly, "bias" is a noun, not an adjective. Maybe that distinction doesn't mean anything to you, but I can assure you it makes you look to most English speakers like someone who is very bad at writing (and probably speaking) English. The correct form of what you appear to trying to say is "I would be biased if it was allowed". I strongly recommend abandoning this user name, and inventing a better one. (NOT what I just wrote.) HiLo48 (talk) 10:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And how would I do that? I managed to make a typo probably because of phone autocorrect being dodgy and whatnot. I am a fluent English speaker and speak it as a first language. I would be bias if it was allowed (talk) 12:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but I have some difficulty regarding someone who uses bias as an adjective as fluent in the language. You can just abandon this user name, and invent a better, simpler, more sensible one. HiLo48 (talk) 00:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And I asked, how do I abandon it? 120.21.234.249 (talk) 07:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just stop using it. HiLo48 (talk) 07:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not logged in rn as I'm accessibg from phone Gmail but how the hell you do it? Where do I find it 120.21.234.249 (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Information icon Hi I would be bias if it was allowed! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Australian Labor Party several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Australian Labor Party, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. TarnishedPathtalk 07:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]