User talk:Renamed user 1oj3saabam

Rating script

Hi Toobigtokale! Just to let you know that in Special:Diff/1193361435, the rating script you used seemed to change {{WikiProject Newspapers}} to {{WikiProject Journalism}}. I just thought I'd let you know, as the gadget's documentation page mentions that it hasn't been updated in a while, and so I wondered if the WikiProject change may have been a glitch resulting from this. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten_[meow] 17:11, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Oh, thank you for pointing that out!

Hm yeah maybe I should stop using the script for now, even if it makes rating pages faster... It has a couple of issues besides just this. toobigtokale (talk) 17:13, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

No problem! I haven't tried it that much myself, but (from what I understand), WP:RATER is the successor to that script (in case you're not already aware). Best, ‍—‍a smart kitten_[meow] 17:17, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Installed it, thanks :) Just in case you're interested in the script, my thoughts on it: I had tried it previously and found it loaded noticeably slower than the older version. However given that the older one is actively harmful, it's worth using. toobigtokale (talk) 18:48, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:15, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, was my mistake. I hadn't spotted that part of the MOS before. I should have undone all of the mistaken moves that I was able to undo already, with a few left over in uncontroversial move requests. toobigtokale (talk) 07:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Toobigtokale,

Why are you taking on a huge article move project....and then you end up reverting all of your page moves? This is disrutive editing to move articles unnecessarily multiple times. Please think through an action like moving an aticle and asking yourself if it is actually necessary. Pages shouldn't be casually moved around, there should be a solid reason to retitle a page that doesn't end up with your changing your mind a few minutes later. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Apologies again. I've made over 30k edits in my Wiki editing career so far and made hundreds of moves, and this is the first time I've made such a mistake. I understand the implication of it, and wish I had done some more research in advance. All I can do is apologize; I try hard to abide by policies and I'd like to think my edits are normally productive. toobigtokale (talk) 07:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

따로 연락 드리는 칸을 못 찾아서 여기서 여쭤봅니다

왜 편집자 팀은(그것도 그쪽도 포함돼있는 듯한 편집자 팀) 대놓고 우리 쪽 민족주의 문서만 인종차별주의적이며 쇼비니즘이며 그런 식으로 쓰는걸 용인하나요? 아니, 딱 그 부분만 뭔가 톤이 되게 부정적이고, 주관적으로 보여서 톤을 중립적으로 그 부분 편집하면 대놓고 편집자 팀에서 나서서 unconstructive라는 되게 불명확한 대답이나 돌려주면서 밴 시키는데 이거야 말로 불평등 아닌가요? 어떤 부분으로 unconstructive한건가요 대체?

거기다가 주변 나라 민족주의 페이지들 들어가보면 그런 말은 하나도 없고, 심지어 가이징 가이징 이러면서 외국인이 등록증 없이는 돌아다니면 큰일나는 그런 옆나라 일본쪽 민족주의 페이지는 인종차별의 인, 쇼비니즘의 쇼 뭐 그런건 하나도 안 적혀있는건 정말 가관이라 봅니다. 또 한국 민족주의 페이지 톤 고정시키시는 사람들 페이지 보면 뭐 제국주의 일본 페이지쪽에 731 부대 페이지 언급이나 인용을 지우는 등 아주 대놓고 일본쪽만 편향적으로 하고 계시는 분들이 아예 상주하고 계시더라고요? 거기 편집팀 우리나라 민족주의만 문제 있다고 보시는 것 같습니다만 틀렸나요? 유저 페이지에 동아시아 쪽에 문제가 있으면 지적 해야한다면서, 그런 부분은 가만 놔두시는 이유는 뭔지 모르겠습니다.

또 대체 무릉도원 그 인간은 또 누군가요? 이상하게 이쪽 편집팀은 단체로 우리나라 사람들한테 불평등해 보이는거 고친다 싶으면 국수주의적이고 우익이며 뭐 온갖 레이블 붙이는건 기본이고, 또 다 그 사람으로 치부를 하고는 아이피 차단을 하시더라고요? 대한민국에 그 무릉도원 그 인간 하나만 산다고 생각하는 모양입니다? 차라리 그냥 SK KT LG ip 대놓고 다 무릉도원이라 간주해서 차단하시는게 더 빠를 것 같습니다. 뭐 이 아이피도 그 무릉도원이라하고 밴 시킬 것 같지만 하도 궁금하고 답답해서 여쭤봅니다. 166.104.225.72 (talk) 02:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

제 답변은 여기에 있습니다. toobigtokale (talk) 06:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

답변 정말 잘 읽었습니다. 궁금증이 모두 다 해결될 수 있게 정말 잘 정리해주신 점 매우 감사합니다. 속이 정말 시원해졌습니다. 그리고 지금 다시 읽어보니 감정이 격해진 나머지 되게 무례하게 군 부분들이 있었습니다. 그 부분에 대해서 사과하겠습니다. 무례하게 막말한 점 정말 죄송합니다.

사정이 그러신 줄 몰랐습니다. 상기 했듯이 주변 나라 문서들, 특히 옆나라 관련된 문서들 톤과 더불어 문서 편집 못하게끔 프로텍션까지 거시길래, 여기 진짜로 뭔가 팀을 짜놓고 활동하고 있는 거 아닌가 하는 잘못된 추측을 했습니다. 그저 무릉도원이라는 이상한 인간 때문에 이런 일이 벌어지는 부분도 큰 줄은 몰랐습니다. 그리고 그 무릉도원이라는 인간도 객관적으로 봐도 잘못한 인간은 맞네요.(그러니 그런 레퓨테이션이 생기지;;)

그렇다 하더라도 에디터라는 말이 대놓고 사용자 페이지에 붙어있는 사람들이 왜 unconsctructive한지 아무런 설명도 없고 밴을 먹이는 행위는 정말 이상하고 불평등한 것 같습니다. 거기다가 왜 unconstructive한지 물어보니 거기에도 답변이 아무것도 없이 밴을 먹였던 점 또한 정말 잘못된 것 같습니다.

앞으로는 말씀해주신대로 아예 아이디를 생성하여 활동하도록 하겠습니다.감사합니다. 166.104.225.72 (talk) 09:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

괜찮습니다, 비정규 사용자의 경우 위키백과가 어떻게 작동하는지 알기가 어렵습니다. 저도 작년 3월 부터 배우기 시작했는데 아직 모르는 것이 많습니다. 편집자가 돼면 저에게 큰 도움입니다. toobigtokale (talk) 07:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

The Korean Barnstar

The Korean Barnstar It seems that you are missing The Korean Barnstar from your collection. Let me remedy this and thamk you for your contributions to Korean related topics.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much :) Thanks for the collaboration and support! You've done a lot for both Wikipedia and Korea, we're lucky to have you 🙂 toobigtokale (talk) 04:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

linktext fix request

Can you make these changes to Sea of Japan?

1. {{linktext|に|ほ|ん|か|い}} → にほんかい
2. 동|해 → 동해 (2 instances)

172.56.232.103 (talk) 04:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Done toobigtokale (talk) 06:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you

I know close to zero about East Asia so for all I know you are doing a terrible job as a content creator but I do know about writing and sourcing and...damn your articles are so cool. I learn a lot just from glancing at them and I'm very grateful that you've chosen to volunteer some of your time here. So thank you and keep on keepin' on :) jengod (talk) 00:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, happy that my writing is reaching people 🙂. I encourage you and everyone to fact check everything I write; rigor is the goal. toobigtokale (talk) 00:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Nicolinas DYK nomination

Hi Toobigtokale,

Thank you for taking the time to review the article Nicolinas and providing your insights on it. Your feedback is appreciated as I aim to enhance the article's quality and accuracy. I respectfully acknowledge your concerns regarding the language used in the article. While I understand your perspective on the use of certain expressions, I believe they accurately reflect the vibrant nature of the subject matter, as depicted in the sources. The phrases you highlighted, such as "vibrant assembly" and "reimagined the nomenclature", are drawn directly from the sources available. These expressions are not embellishments but rather reflections of the cultural significance attributed to the Nicolinas festivities by the participants. Furthermore, I stand by the neutrality of the sources cited. While they may have been produced by individuals closely associated with the subject, they are presented in a manner consistent with the objective of documenting information rather than promoting the festivities to the rest of the world and such. In maintaining a neutral stance, it is crucial to represent the subject matter as accurately and authentically as possible.

I appreciate your feedback and respect your perspective on the matter. Should there be any additional concerns or suggestions for improvement, I am open to further discussion and collaboration, but I must say I disagree with the points you stated.

Thank you once again for your contribution to the review process.

V.B.Speranza (talk) 23:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for being responsive to the feedback.

I recommend you take a close read of WP:VOICE. Avoid stating opinions as facts. Usually, articles will contain information about the significant opinions that have been expressed about their subjects. However, these opinions should not be stated in Wikipedia's voice. Rather, they should be attributed in the text to particular sources, or where justified, described as widespread views, etc. Even if the opinion is published in a reliable source, it's still an opinion at the end of the day.

Again and to be clear, you're still allowed to write in these opinions. The only thing is that if wording comes directly from sources, it needs to be made clear that that's the case. You can write things like "People reportedly really enjoy x", but you can't say "x is fun or joyous". toobigtokale (talk) 23:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

English isn’t really my main language, maybe those details flew over my head. I’m currently taking a brake from Wikipedia, someone else has to do it for me, or, you’ll have to wait until I regain my patience to come back to this app.

Regardless, thank you once more for reviewing the article.

V.B.Speranza (talk) 17:20, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

That's ok, I recommend you close the GA nomination for now. You can reopen once you've worked on the article again. toobigtokale (talk) 19:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

I think we live in a community that can solve the problems as well, I significantly improved the article, but other ones can clean up the article as I’m not the owner of it.

The nomination stays up until either someone cleans it up as you suggest or it fails and becomes just another regular article.

V.B.Speranza (talk) 21:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

WP:GAN/I#N1, we've established there's issues that will take a notable amount of effort to clean, this isn't good or polite practice. It adds to the already long backlog of articles that need review. Also you'd be surprised at how long it takes for many articles to get fixed. The majority of my edits are on pages that haven't been adequately fixed for over a decade. I'll leave the decision up to you, but please try to understand where my feedback is coming from at the very least. toobigtokale (talk) 21:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	As a Koryoin I am grateful to your work devoted to the Korean communities abroad. Eunseonshin (talk) 11:40, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much 🙂 I'm happy to work on these, fascinated by Koryoin history. I'd love to read future articles you work on! toobigtokale (talk) 17:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Hometown Village

On 8 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hometown Village, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hometown Village is a community of Sakhalin Koreans who were finally allowed to return to South Korea after the dissolution of the Soviet Union? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hometown Village. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hometown Village), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1883 Korean special mission to the United States

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1883 Korean special mission to the United States you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Godtres -- Godtres (talk) 10:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1883 Korean special mission to the United States

The article 1883 Korean special mission to the United States you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1883 Korean special mission to the United States for comments about the article, and Talk:1883 Korean special mission to the United States/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Godtres -- Godtres (talk) 11:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Rana Reider DYK

Hi @Toobigtokale

Just want to follow up to check if the DYK for Rana Reider is good to go now?

- Imcdc Contact 00:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Oops, thank you for checking in, forgot to watch the page! toobigtokale (talk) 00:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Editor of the Week

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Prodraxis submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I would like to nominate Toobigtokale for Editor of the Week for their tireless work on Korea-related articles. As a fellow member of WikiProject Korea, I've always been impressed by their content work, including Utoro, Uji, Budae-jjigae and Koryo Ilbo. Oftentimes, due to the demographics of Wikipedia users, Korean subjects are often overlooked due to systemic bias, but users like Toobigtokale combat that bias by engaging in high quality editing in this area. This nomination was seconded by ClydeFranklin, theleekycauldron and F4U.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}

Thanks again for your efforts! Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 11:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)